Re: Is Shawn Porter really interested in a fight with Brook ?
Posted: 20 Apr 2014, 08:52
Brook-Porter is not PPV. And never will be...
100% correct. No way will Hearn put Brook in with Porter, especially after last night.Final round wrote:Brook would get mauled by Porter
It will be a dangerous for Brook against Porter now, Porter is on a roll,he looks powerful and awkward, will Hearn go a different route once again, no body has done that to Malinaggi.Boxerbeetle123 wrote:100% correct. No way will Hearn put Brook in with Porter, especially after last night.Final round wrote:Brook would get mauled by Porter
Let's see how many more final eliminators we get instead...
would be laughable if he does.Anzi wrote:It will be a dangerous for Brook against Porter now, Porter is on a roll,he looks powerful and awkward, will Hearn go a different route once again, no body has done that to Malinaggi.Boxerbeetle123 wrote:100% correct. No way will Hearn put Brook in with Porter, especially after last night.Final round wrote:Brook would get mauled by Porter
Let's see how many more final eliminators we get instead...
That's because he is ultra boring. Kugan done a 20 min interview with him not long back and I fell asleep after about 10 secondsThe_Don1 wrote:No-one cares or even knows about Brook in America that's why he wasn't mentioned
That there is no point commenting on Brook threads anymore.IMOmickey1975 wrote:What do the Sheffield boys think?
Yep it'll be the same old story - the Sheffield boys will big up Brook & say we haven't seen the best of him yet (quite right I think, only right to support your local fighter), but most others are now reluctant to show faith in Brook until he's been in with a genuine world level opponent.TJ77 wrote:That there is no point commenting on Brook threads anymore.IMOmickey1975 wrote:What do the Sheffield boys think?
Boxerbeetle123 wrote:100% correct. No way will Hearn put Brook in with Porter, especially after last night.Final round wrote:Brook would get mauled by Porter
Let's see how many more final eliminators we get instead...
Quite a shock to see Paulie worked over lying under the ropes holding his head in pain.Anzi wrote:It will be a dangerous for Brook against Porter now, Porter is on a roll,he looks powerful and awkward, will Hearn go a different route once again, no body has done that to Malinaggi.Boxerbeetle123 wrote:100% correct. No way will Hearn put Brook in with Porter, especially after last night.Final round wrote:Brook would get mauled by Porter
Let's see how many more final eliminators we get instead...
He boxed at 165 lbs as an amateur. Someone said that he knocked out somebody who was/is a light heavyweight on his debut.G0mez wrote:Reading a similar thread elsewhere and it was remarked he was a knockout merchant in the amateurs and boasted a record of something like 270-15 or something.
Yet casuals think he was a guy who was simply Manny's spar and nothing more.
There is more to this guy's game and I think he showed us that last night.
TBF his record was good but not spectacular enough to suggest he was capable of his last two performances. He got a split with Julio Diaz prior to Amir Khan and then fought him again to points.columbo wrote:He boxed at 165 lbs as an amateur. Someone said that he knocked out somebody who was/is a light heavyweight on his debut.G0mez wrote:Reading a similar thread elsewhere and it was remarked he was a knockout merchant in the amateurs and boasted a record of something like 270-15 or something.
Yet casuals think he was a guy who was simply Manny's spar and nothing more.
There is more to this guy's game and I think he showed us that last night.
Na I agree. He's upped his game for sure. Look at the weight he came in at on his debut though and the weight of his opponent http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?cat=bo ... _id=472133Final round wrote:TBF his record was good but not spectacular enough to suggest he was capable of his last two performances. He got a split with Julio Diaz prior to Amir Khan and then fought him again to points.columbo wrote:He boxed at 165 lbs as an amateur. Someone said that he knocked out somebody who was/is a light heavyweight on his debut.G0mez wrote:Reading a similar thread elsewhere and it was remarked he was a knockout merchant in the amateurs and boasted a record of something like 270-15 or something.
Yet casuals think he was a guy who was simply Manny's spar and nothing more.
There is more to this guy's game and I think he showed us that last night.
When I'd seen him previously he didn't really stand out as one to watch then he roughed up Alexander and now he's leathered Paulie!![]()
![]()
Blimey, SMW !columbo wrote: Na I agree. He's upped his game for sure. Look at the weight he came in at on his debut though and the weight of his opponent http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?cat=bo ... _id=472133
Steady against Alexander?! He was pretty damn aggressive in that fight.Taansend wrote:To play the Devils Advocate.....
As impressive as Shawn has looked in his last two bouts lets not get carried away over last nights result. It was a good one but doesn't necessarily mean he's going to blow through Kell.
Porter fought at the middleweight limit as an amateur & also fought above light middle on 11 occasions as a pro. Malignaggi has fought the majority of his career at light welter. Porter fought exactly the right kind of fight against a smaller, older, light punching opponent. Admittedly Paulie has shown durability in the past but he was up against a younger, stronger champion.
Brook is a big welter himself with (it appears so far) decent whiskers and solid power. Thinking that Shawn will blow through him in the same manner as he did Malignaggi is a tad naive. I doubt he'd even TRY to fight like that, possibly reverting to the steady pressure of the Alexander fight.
Exactly.columbo wrote:Steady against Alexander?! He was pretty damn aggressive in that fight.Taansend wrote:To play the Devils Advocate.....
As impressive as Shawn has looked in his last two bouts lets not get carried away over last nights result. It was a good one but doesn't necessarily mean he's going to blow through Kell.
Porter fought at the middleweight limit as an amateur & also fought above light middle on 11 occasions as a pro. Malignaggi has fought the majority of his career at light welter. Porter fought exactly the right kind of fight against a smaller, older, light punching opponent. Admittedly Paulie has shown durability in the past but he was up against a younger, stronger champion.
Brook is a big welter himself with (it appears so far) decent whiskers and solid power. Thinking that Shawn will blow through him in the same manner as he did Malignaggi is a tad naive. I doubt he'd even TRY to fight like that, possibly reverting to the steady pressure of the Alexander fight.
What about Mayweather and Pacquaio in terms of age and miles on the clock?Broomhall wrote:Malignaggi 33, lot of miles on the clock, stoppage losses to Amir Khan, Ricky Hatton when he was in his prime. I dont think this makes Porter into Sonny Liston. Worn out old pro loses to up and coming young fighter. History of boxing.
Paulie outpointed Judah easily , run Broner to the wire (won on peoples cards ) and done Cano. He wasn't showing real signs of wear.Broomhall wrote:Malignaggi 33, lot of miles on the clock, stoppage losses to Amir Khan, Ricky Hatton when he was in his prime. I dont think this makes Porter into Sonny Liston. Worn out old pro loses to up and coming young fighter. History of boxing.