Page 2 of 10
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:00
by diddy
This ain't Zab, Paulie.
How awful is Judah? I mean seriously. He sucks.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:00
by gilgamesh
WHOA! I wasn't expecting a stoppage in this one, but after that 2nd round it looks like a stoppage in Porter's favor is a very real possibility. He was hammering Paulie in the 2nd.
2-0 Porter, you could argue that 2nd was a 10-8 round for him.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:02
by No Tomorrow
diddy wrote:How awful is Judah? I mean seriously. He sucks.
Exaggeration much?
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:03
by diddy
This fight is over.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:03
by lefty
Malignaggi is getting the shit beaten out of him here.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:04
by gilgamesh
columbo wrote:Malignaggi is getting the poo beaten out of him here.
Yeah. I was just about to say Porter is kicking his ass even worse than Khan or Hatton did.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:04
by diddy
Ref might stop this eventually. Round 10 or so.
Or round 4.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:04
by lefty
Knockdown.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:05
by lefty
Be very interesting to see how keen Brook will be if this continues
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:06
by MachoTime
It's over. Porter just destroyed him.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:06
by lefty
Malignaggi got fornicating brutalised there! Good luck Kell.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:06
by gilgamesh
Porter KO 4. Very Impressive performance!!!
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:06
by No Tomorrow
That's awesome. Go Porter
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:07
by diddy
Once again. Zab blows. And so does Broner.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:07
by lefty
Does anyone think Porter has a bit of a Aaron Pryor vibe about him? Not trying to say he's anywhere as good by the way.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:07
by gilgamesh
columbo wrote:Malignaggi got effing brutalised there! Good luck Kell.
Malignaggi might retire after that one. That's about as bad as it gets. Definitely the worst he's ever been beaten.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:07
by lefty
diddy wrote:Once again. Zab blows. And so does Broner.
I think Zab was always somewhat overrated but he's also shot to be fair.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:08
by Baby Face Finster
Porter beat the crap out of Paulie but he is one dirty fighter. He used a lot of elbows and pushed off a lot.
Porter is really good but he will never be the elite of the division.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:09
by lefty
gilgamesh wrote:columbo wrote:Malignaggi got effing brutalised there! Good luck Kell.
Malignaggi might retire after that one. That's about as bad as it gets. Definitely the worst he's ever been beaten.
Whilst not a huge puncher, I think Porter hits harder than his record suggests. He rocked Alexander numerous times in their fight and Paulie normally has a very good chin.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:09
by No Tomorrow
columbo wrote:Does anyone think Porter has a bit of a Aaron Pryor vibe about him? Not trying to say he's anywhere as good by the way.
WOW. I was just going to post that a couple minutes ago and pulled up Google images of them to view the similarities. Porter to me is a jacked Pryor
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:10
by Baby Face Finster
columbo wrote:gilgamesh wrote:columbo wrote:Malignaggi got effing brutalised there! Good luck Kell.
Malignaggi might retire after that one. That's about as bad as it gets. Definitely the worst he's ever been beaten.
Whilst not a huge puncher, I think Porter hits harder than his record suggests. He rocked Alexander numerous times in their fight and Paulie normally has a very good chin.
Paulie kept backing up with his head straight up. He was open for the left hook all night long.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:10
by lefty
Baby Face Finster wrote:Porter beat the crap out of Paulie but he is one dirty fighter. He used a lot of elbows and pushed off a lot.
Porter is really good but he will never be the elite of the division.
I dont think it was that dirty. They both had an arm free on the inside and Porter was making the most of it. Paulie just couldnt handle it.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:11
by lefty
Baby Face Finster wrote:columbo wrote:gilgamesh wrote:
Malignaggi might retire after that one. That's about as bad as it gets. Definitely the worst he's ever been beaten.
Whilst not a huge puncher, I think Porter hits harder than his record suggests. He rocked Alexander numerous times in their fight and Paulie normally has a very good chin.
Paulie kept backing up with his head straight up. He was open for the left hook all night long.
Oh i agree. He still normally has a solid beard though.
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:11
by MachoTime
Porter vs. Thurman? Anyone
Re: Hopkins/Shumenov (with undercard)
Posted: 19 Apr 2014, 23:11
by No Tomorrow
diddy wrote:Once again. Zab blows. And so does Broner.
Dude call them out. You could probably get a lot of money facing them. Shouldn't be hard