BoxRec

Froch in the rematch! Got a feeling it's going to be very pro Groves.

Lewis in the run up to Bruno fight

littlepug wrote:Lewis in the run up to Bruno fight

Good shout.

It is easy to forget how genuinely suspicious most of the UK general public were of this 'Canadian' called Lewis when he first came back to the UK to launch his pro career.

Many saw it as a cynical marketing exercise.

It wasn't until he was successful on the world stage that the British public began to warm to Lewis...

Michael gomez played the villain well

Esham Pickering

stevieb_8006 wrote:Michael gomez played the villain well

He was very popular! I think the topic means fighters who were actually disliked.

misterpunch wrote:

Cholo_cws wrote:Yes, Chisora. I didn't think of him.

I used the term dislike loosely. Maybe unpopular is better.

Anybody know or remember how Dick Richardson was viewed? I believe he had his fair share of controversies in the ring.

DICK RICHARDSON wasn't really disliked by the british boxing public. he wasn't an angel in the ring (a bit of dirty fighter) but they didn't get on his back as far as I remember. brian London was disliked more around that time because he was regarded - rightly or wrongly - as a guy that didn't try to win and would too easily cave in.

Thanks. I just thought of Richardson as I was just thinking back to the years before bravado and boasting became practically the norm and so I wondered what if anything might have made a large portion of the public want a boxer to lose back then. I guess a dirty fighter would have had to have been really dirty to have been seen as the panto villain.

Lennox vs Bruno
Mayweather vs most
Fury and Chisora of late

Audley must fit in with some sort of pantomine role!

mickey1975 wrote:

stevieb_8006 wrote:Michael gomez played the villain well

He was very popular! I think the topic means fighters who were actually disliked.

Oh hes was popular alright, but played the bad guy to an absolute tee.

Michael Gomez is a legend in my eye s

tear up wrote:Esham Pickering

Cholo_cws wrote:

misterpunch wrote:

Cholo_cws wrote:Yes, Chisora. I didn't think of him.

I used the term dislike loosely. Maybe unpopular is better.

Anybody know or remember how Dick Richardson was viewed? I believe he had his fair share of controversies in the ring.

DICK RICHARDSON wasn't really disliked by the british boxing public. he wasn't an angel in the ring (a bit of dirty fighter) but they didn't get on his back as far as I remember. brian London was disliked more around that time because he was regarded - rightly or wrongly - as a guy that didn't try to win and would too easily cave in.

Thanks. I just thought of Richardson as I was just thinking back to the years before bravado and boasting became practically the norm and so I wondered what if anything might have made a large portion of the public want a boxer to lose back then. I guess a dirty fighter would have had to have been really dirty to have been seen as the panto villain.

that's about right

Eubanks v Benn first fight

tear up wrote:Esham Pickering

A very nice guy, I remember wanting him to win that one.

tear up wrote:Michael Gomez is a legend in my eye s

till kevin lear smashed him to bits in his own backyard

Kevin Lear was a really good boxer, he did well that night; his brother Danny was a really good amateur.

Fat Git wrote:

tear up wrote:Esham Pickering

A very nice guy, I remember wanting him to win that one. [

He was a class fighter esham I heard lately he s got his licence back and going to fight again

wappingboy wrote:

tear up wrote:Michael Gomez is a legend in my eye s

till kevin lear smashed him to bits in his own backyard

yeah, kevin was great in that one. would have had a very interesting career but for the shoulder. I think he went over and gave gomez a kiss to wind him up when he got in the ring! (then smashed him to bits)

gotta love gomez though - top bloke