Page 2 of 2
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Posted: 09 Jun 2014, 12:29
by AntonS
What would say if ANBF (Qld) canned some of your fights??
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Posted: 09 Jun 2014, 18:11
by fox
AntonS wrote:What would say if ANBF (Qld) canned some of your fights??
Yeah if there was a reason to can it I would understand.
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Posted: 09 Jun 2014, 18:50
by The Raw Prawn
Kats and Earl aren't the only fighters still going around with no real prospects left in boxing.
Very disappointing that two 39yr old punching bags, Aswin Cabuy and Walter Pupua can still get a licence to
box in this country.
Boxing authorities, matchmakers and promoters all share the blame.
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Posted: 09 Jun 2014, 22:25
by bogan whisperer
The Raw Prawn wrote:Kats and Earl aren't the only fighters still going around with no real prospects left in boxing.
Very disappointing that two 39yr old punching bags, Aswin Cabuy and Walter Pupua can still get a licence to
box in this country.
Boxing authorities, matchmakers and promoters all share the blame.
There are others out there too who should be told enough is enough.
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Posted: 09 Jun 2014, 23:40
by fox
I'm not saying that either fighter should have their licence revoked. But their seems to be alot of people on here complaining about it and I was asking if Qld could can the fight as they have in other states. It all comes down to the matchmaking. Lets just hope both fighters come through unscathed.
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Posted: 10 Jun 2014, 00:19
by The Raw Prawn
just like to make it clear, no disrespect was intended to any of the boxers mentioned.
They have all made their own positive contributions to the sport we enjoy.

Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Posted: 10 Jun 2014, 01:19
by AntonS
Take it easy guys. I'll ref the fight & one unanswered punch will conclude proceedings ;;-)
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Posted: 12 Jun 2014, 23:54
by bogan whisperer
AntonS wrote:Take it easy guys. I'll ref the fight & one unanswered punch will conclude proceedings ;;-)
Probably the way this one should be refereed.
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Posted: 19 Jun 2014, 19:50
by caveman
prob lettin fight go ahead cause both fighters have passed medicals.......and both have slipped backwards,not just one of them
Re: Katsidis v Earl II
Posted: 20 Jun 2014, 01:53
by fox
Well doctors have passed them there should be no problem. Good luck to both boys.