Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by ste1983 »

Any official news on this from Hobson?

Love how all the Warren haters jump on this as a chance to have pop despite him not even promoting the show.
Clint Magnum
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 443
Joined: 15 Feb 2012, 11:55

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by Clint Magnum »

earsjohn wrote:
Clint Magnum wrote:This seems to be gathering pace.
I would suspect both camps as well as the thousands of punters who've bought tickets would want a definitive answer ASAP.
Surely the tickets state "Championship Boxing" and a WBO inter-pointless strap will be on the line at least.
Its billed specifically as an IBF World Title Fight. One would think they wouldn't start selling tickets on this until they'd at least had a signed waiver to defer the mandatory from the IBF. They could end up with egg on their face.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by palooka »

ste1983 wrote:Any official news on this from Hobson?

Love how all the Warren haters jump on this as a chance to have pop despite him not even promoting the show.


:OhYes: :bow:
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by Final round »

The IBF have approved the fight
Gazmac81
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2103
Joined: 04 Oct 2008, 10:06

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by Gazmac81 »

Nice one
Final round wrote:The IBF have approved the fight
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by JimJim2009 »

Whatever happens, I think its fair to say - taking into account what happened with the IBF belt last year - that Hobson needs to work on his communication with the IBF.
DMA1987
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2927
Joined: 04 Jun 2011, 17:05

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by DMA1987 »

ste1983 wrote:Any official news on this from Hobson?

Love how all the Warren haters jump on this as a chance to have pop despite him not even promoting the show.
Why do you like Warren?
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by JimJim2009 »

Having a pop at Warren was valid, even though he isn't the promoter - Warren announced the fight, and talked it up for months.

They were all caught with their pants down. Looks like favours have been called in with Goldenboy to smooth the way to IBF approval. This sort of thing should be sorted out before the fight is announced though.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by palooka »

columbo wrote:
robpalmer135 wrote:
columbo wrote:Unless Palmer is pigg and it's some elaborate ploy.... it is a bit of a strange coincidence that he pops up when he never comes on here after pigg has been here...
Who is Pigg....I am not Pigg. Genuinely.
Alright fairplay mate. He's some fella who's been talking poo about you on here.[/quote]

Funny poo as well.
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by Yes We Can »

Scorbutic wrote:Image

Shut up Rob (PIGG?)
i feel a Wilson ban coming on.

oink oink


PIGG.
bodyactive
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by bodyactive »

everyone is looking at a the politics and not the fight..Bookies have Butler favorite I thing Butler has alot more ability than Hall but that doesnt guarantee a win especially when uv got someone as tough big and mentally strong in front of you especially 2nd half of the fight.Butlers team keep mentioning that he dominated sparring. well u cant go on that either. looking forward to seeing it def 50/50.
Clint Magnum
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 443
Joined: 15 Feb 2012, 11:55

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by Clint Magnum »

bodyactive wrote:everyone is looking at a the politics and not the fight..Bookies have Butler favorite I thing Butler has alot more ability than Hall but that doesnt guarantee a win especially when uv got someone as tough big and mentally strong in front of you especially 2nd half of the fight.Butlers team keep mentioning that he dominated sparring. well u cant go on that either. looking forward to seeing it def 50/50.

Agreed. I think this and the announcement of John Lewis Dickenson v Ovil Mckenzie are really interesting 50/50 fights. It'll be interesting to see who they match with Bradley Saunders.
bodyactive
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by bodyactive »

also on the bill is jason cunninghan, Josh leather v tommy carus Rhys evans, Thomas Patrick Ward, Jordan King, Lewis Scott.
nick885
Middleweight
Posts: 298
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 18:05

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by nick885 »

JimJim2009 wrote:
tear up wrote:How does butler deserve his shot better than ward he s had one bantam weight fight ward was lucky he got his shot by the way
If you judge it strictly on fights at bantamweight then I concede one fight isn't enough, I was meaning more generally - there's only 3lbs difference between divisions. If you are good in one division, I don't think you have to necessarily start from scratch when moving up into the next. I wouldn't argue Butler is a top contender in either weight division but I think he's acceptable as a voluntary for the IBF bantamweight title. The previous challenger wasn't.
Who has butler fought other than fighters with just a few rounds under their belt or fighters in the twilight of their careers.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27523
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Hall v Butler not for the IBF title

Post by stujones »

Didn't give Hall a chance at all until I saw them face to face - they look different weight divisions. I still like Butler for the win, but not as convinced as I was.

I have a similar thing re Cotto vs Martinez. Felt that Cotto has more left in the tank of the two, but seeing them face to face -Martinez is so much bigger.
Post Reply