Re: IBF title shot for one of our lads.
Posted: 23 May 2014, 05:01
GOmez will be right on this one.
I hope he ismickey1975 wrote:GOmez will be right on this one.
Yeah that won't happen in the UK.DMA1987 wrote:How about Quigg v Santa Cruz then, now we know its not for the IBF?
Edit. Forget it, doesn't sound like its the case.
Datsue wrote:Can we not all just have a whip round so Selby gets a shot at the WBC at home, please?
I really want to see Jhonny Gonzalez knock someone's head clean off live & cannot afford to go to Mexico again.
Ta.
x
Not in a million years. Hearn and co wouldnt have the balls to make that fight. They know Rigondeaux is the don in the division.ttornado wrote:Quigg vs Rigondeaux for the WBA belt
Too right, it was a joke!columbo wrote: Not in a million years. Hearn and co wouldnt have the balls to make that fight. They know Rigondeaux is the don in the division.
im with you on thatttornado wrote:Too right, it was a joke!columbo wrote: Not in a million years. Hearn and co wouldnt have the balls to make that fight. They know Rigondeaux is the don in the division.
Well the real joke is no one at 122 wanting to face the best.
I know Hasegawa DID say he was willing to fight Rigondeaux though I assume the Martinez fight was easier to make from his side. Rigondeaux Vs Hasegawa would have been pretty decent.columbo wrote:im with you on thatttornado wrote:Too right, it was a joke!columbo wrote: Not in a million years. Hearn and co wouldnt have the balls to make that fight. They know Rigondeaux is the don in the division.
Well the real joke is no one at 122 wanting to face the best.
June 14th in New Yorkhandsofstone wrote:Any word on Brian Rose's shot at Demetrius Andrade for the WBO?
Been sorted for ages now.handsofstone wrote:Any word on Brian Rose's shot at Demetrius Andrade for the WBO?
I enjoyed watching Hasegawa against Martinez. It was my first real time watching him. I know you said he's kind of shot now but I think he still looked pretty good at times in that fight. He still looked fast to me. It was only really when he got involved in exchanges, particularily on the ropes that he ended up a cropper.Boxing Prospect wrote:I know Hasegawa DID say he was willing to fight Rigondeaux though I assume the Martinez fight was easier to make from his side. Rigondeaux Vs Hasegawa would have been pretty decent.columbo wrote:im with you on thatttornado wrote: Too right, it was a joke!
Well the real joke is no one at 122 wanting to face the best.
He had a lovely style did Hasegawa but he gets in with real punchers & then ships the big one. Never quite defensively adroit enough to get away with doing his thing versus a prime power-puncher, I think, though if you couldn't bang he'd carve you up. Although he beat him twice I always thought a younger, less battle-worn Veeraphol Whateverhissurnamewasthatweek would've done him.columbo wrote: I enjoyed watching Hasegawa against Martinez. It was my first real time watching him. I know you said he's kind of shot now but I think he still looked pretty good at times in that fight. He still looked fast to me. It was only really when he got involved in exchanges, particularily on the ropes that he ended up a cropper.
It makes me laugh. Hearn always says these are boxers that will fight anyone they don't think about avoiding someone... Then constantly ignores Rigondeux questionscolumbo wrote:im with you on thatttornado wrote:Too right, it was a joke!columbo wrote: Not in a million years. Hearn and co wouldnt have the balls to make that fight. They know Rigondeaux is the don in the division.
Well the real joke is no one at 122 wanting to face the best.
He also says he will be willing to face him if Quigg unifies. To my mind that's fair enough. Ironically I don't see too many people slating Leo Santa Cruz for not mentioning Rigo even tho they rate LSC above Quigg.DMA1987 wrote:He doesn't ignore the questions, he said Rigo would beat Quigg. He is pretty open about Rigondeaux, or more the reasons why he won't go near him.