Page 2 of 3
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 11:35
by Counter-puncher
Boxingcutsman wrote:Counter-puncher wrote:nice namedrop, too, its that kind of 'I'm dropping a name but it's not such a big name that it'll seem like a blatant namedrop, it's just that I happen to have a story which involves me dropping a name' namedrop. not that 'hey look everyone I know ... X' kind of namedrop


wasn't meant has a name drop, if I was gonna drop names then I could of said that last Tuesday My wife & I had breakfast with David Hasslehoff & then later on that day met up with Elton John at Claridges in London, but I didn't, even though amazingly it's a true story
But getting back to Golovkin, the way his power has been described to me, it's genuinely unbelievable mate, freakish.
i know mate just pulling your leg a bit, i like your style

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 11:36
by orbtastic
Harry Styles was standing next to me at wine tasting at Soho House last night, couldn't be arsed talking to him though.
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 11:38
by Boxingcutsman
orbtastic wrote:Harry Styles was standing next to me at wine tasting at Soho House last night, couldn't be arsed talking to him though.

I don't blame ya mate, my kids would of loved that opportunity though tbh

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 11:39
by Boxingcutsman
Counter-puncher wrote:Boxingcutsman wrote:Counter-puncher wrote:nice namedrop, too, its that kind of 'I'm dropping a name but it's not such a big name that it'll seem like a blatant namedrop, it's just that I happen to have a story which involves me dropping a name' namedrop. not that 'hey look everyone I know ... X' kind of namedrop


wasn't meant has a name drop, if I was gonna drop names then I could of said that last Tuesday My wife & I had breakfast with David Hasslehoff & then later on that day met up with Elton John at Claridges in London, but I didn't, even though amazingly it's a true story
But getting back to Golovkin, the way his power has been described to me, it's genuinely unbelievable mate, freakish.
i know mate just pulling your leg a bit, i like your style


I know mate, has for style, I ain't got non but luckily my wife does, fuk knows what she's doing with me

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 11:40
by Boxingcutsman
Viktor Vaughn wrote:No name dropping, but I do know a former trainer who is obsessed with GGG. He phones through every time he fights to tell me he’d beat everyone. Then someone else fights and I get another call explain how and why GGG would beat them. God knows what’s going to happen when he loses.
Come on mate, while we're on the subject of names we know, let us in

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 11:51
by hurlock
Spencer fearon??
The secret?
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 11:52
by whiskey
Nice interview TD, that one slipped past my radar mate.
GGG is phenomenal.
Poor old Carl Froch, it looks like he'll have another shít load of people to prove wrong again.
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 12:02
by Counter-puncher
Viktor Vaughn wrote:No name dropping, but I do know a former trainer who is obsessed with GGG. He phones through every time he fights to tell me he’d beat everyone. Then someone else fights and I get another call explain how and why GGG would beat them. God knows what’s going to happen when he loses.
oh, now this one's clever. fiendish, fiendish. a namedrop so subtle it
isn't a namedrop
boxingcutsman take note

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 12:04
by Boxingcutsman
Counter-puncher wrote:Viktor Vaughn wrote:No name dropping, but I do know a former trainer who is obsessed with GGG. He phones through every time he fights to tell me he’d beat everyone. Then someone else fights and I get another call explain how and why GGG would beat them. God knows what’s going to happen when he loses.
oh, now this one's clever. fiendish, fiendish. a namedrop so subtle it
isn't a namedrop
boxingcutsman take note

Note taken

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 12:21
by dragons
Would be a great fight this one
The fight we all want next for Carl Froch in Vegas
Golovkin wins in what would be the Fight of the Year !
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 12:23
by TheLeprechaun
Froch would never fight him. Too fearful of the power.
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 12:33
by Horse
TheLeprechaun wrote:Froch would never fight him. Too fearful of the power.
Cobra Chicken.
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 12:36
by daviddee
Boxingcutsman wrote:Counter-puncher wrote:nice namedrop, too, its that kind of 'I'm dropping a name but it's not such a big name that it'll seem like a blatant namedrop, it's just that I happen to have a story which involves me dropping a name' namedrop. not that 'hey look everyone I know ... X' kind of namedrop


wasn't meant has a name drop, if I was gonna drop names then I could of said that last Tuesday My wife & I had breakfast with David Hasslehoff in ChinoLatino in London & then later on that day met up with Elton John at Claridges in London, but I didn't, even though amazingly it's a true story
But getting back to Golovkin, the way his power has been described to me, it's genuinely unbelievable mate, freakish.
You didn't have breakfast with him ha. You were too star struck to speak to him..
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 12:38
by Boxerbeetle
TheLeprechaun wrote:Froch would never fight him. Too fearful of the power.
I hope that's sarcasm, otherwise good God, what more does Froch have to do to prove his courage? Fight a Klitschko?
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 12:49
by thepocketrocket
Not a fight I want to see. Golovkin may seriously hurt Carl, and now way Mr Froch deserves that.
Far too much respect.
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 12:53
by Horse
thepocketrocket wrote:Not a fight I want to see. Golovkin may seriously hurt Carl, and now way Mr Froch deserves that.
Far too much respect.
Golovkin is a hypejob, give Froch some real respect.
Golovkin looks good against fringe contenders, how would he look against the guys Froch has fought?
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 12:54
by thepocketrocket
Horse wrote:thepocketrocket wrote:Not a fight I want to see. Golovkin may seriously hurt Carl, and now way Mr Froch deserves that.
Far too much respect.
Golovkin is a hypejob, give Froch some real respect.
Golovkin looks good against fringe contenders, how would he look against the guys Froch has fought?
Evening horse

Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 13:05
by TheLeprechaun
Boxerbeetle123 wrote:TheLeprechaun wrote:Froch would never fight him. Too fearful of the power.
I hope that's sarcasm, otherwise good God, what more does Froch have to do to prove his courage? Fight a Klitschko?
go to 9.50 of this video. Froch admits Golovkin punches too hard. "I'll swerve golovkin like the plague, punches like a mule, I don't need to be in with him"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV1jSJpDLZI
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 13:13
by ashedward
TheLeprechaun wrote:Boxerbeetle123 wrote:TheLeprechaun wrote:Froch would never fight him. Too fearful of the power.
I hope that's sarcasm, otherwise good God, what more does Froch have to do to prove his courage? Fight a Klitschko?
go to 9.50 of this video. Froch admits Golovkin punches too hard. "I'll swerve golovkin like the plague, punches like a mule, I don't need to be in with him"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV1jSJpDLZI
I saw that video at the time,and thought Froch was being a bit dopey and answering for Groves rather then himself like had done before in previous question or possibly being a little tounge in cheek and glib because of the hype.He would fight him him the money was great but at this stage in his career he has nothing really to prove imo
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 13:14
by Taansend
If Froch fights scared he wins.
And by scared I mean smart a la Abraham or Groves II.
If he wades in he gets picked off as long as it lasts.
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 13:16
by lefty
Boxingcutsman wrote:Counter-puncher wrote:Boxingcutsman wrote:

wasn't meant has a name drop, if I was gonna drop names then I could of said that last Tuesday My wife & I had breakfast with David Hasslehoff & then later on that day met up with Elton John at Claridges in London, but I didn't, even though amazingly it's a true story
But getting back to Golovkin, the way his power has been described to me, it's genuinely unbelievable mate, freakish.
i know mate just pulling your leg a bit, i like your style


I know mate, has for style, I ain't got non but luckily my wife does, fuk knows what she's doing with me

WTF does your wife do to be mixing in them circles then mate? lol
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 13:16
by TheLeprechaun
ashedward wrote:
I saw that video at the time,and think Froch was being a bit dopey and answering for Groves rather then himself like had done before in previous question.
Wow. Come on mate, theres excuses and then there is just silliness. Froch was 100% serious there.
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 13:25
by ashedward
TheLeprechaun wrote:ashedward wrote:
I saw that video at the time,and think Froch was being a bit dopey and answering for Groves rather then himself like had done before in previous question.
Wow. Come on mate, theres excuses and then there is just silliness. Froch was 100% serious there.
My opinion of the interview at the time mate and also think he might of been a little glib,I don`t think would swerve anyone if the money and prestige was right,Whats Golovkins best win? Macklin?
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 13:55
by TheLeprechaun
ashedward wrote:TheLeprechaun wrote:ashedward wrote:
I saw that video at the time,and think Froch was being a bit dopey and answering for Groves rather then himself like had done before in previous question.
Wow. Come on mate, theres excuses and then there is just silliness. Froch was 100% serious there.
My opinion of the interview at the time mate and also think he might of been a little glib,I don`t think would swerve anyone if the money and prestige was right,Whats Golovkins best win? Macklin?
No point engaging in a discussion with you, too biased.
Re: Froch v Golovkin at 168 - who wins?
Posted: 02 Jun 2014, 13:59
by ttornado
Most important question, is Froch a 'good boy'?!