Re: Andy Lee
Posted: 09 Jun 2014, 06:04
The Russian commentators were funny. "....durfsk, durfsk, durfsk, Locky Ponch, durfsk, durfsk. durfsk..."
LolSklar wrote:The Russian commentators were funny. "....durfsk, durfsk, durfsk, Locky Ponch, durfsk, durfsk. durfsk..."
Groves v Degale, Woodhouse v Hamilton.dbf wrote:This got me thinking about Adam Booth as a trainer. Lee didn't look great if you ask me. I think Booth gets overated for his work with Haye. What was the best performance from one of his fighters (talking technically/tactically) against decent opposition?
I would have to say Haye v Maccarinelli - David did look sharp and good in that fight although it only lasted under 2 rounds. He looked poor against Fragomeni, Barrett, ok he did a good job on an ageing and battle worn Ruiz but really his punch is what has really mattered not his 'boxing ability'.
Groves too had flaws under booth that weren't refined. Lack of decent defence, engine etc.
If you watch the HBO cast, the other angle shows you his whole jaw moving and contorting with the impact of the punch. It looks a little innocuous from the other angle but it definitely landed hard.J-C wrote:That was a well thrown uppercut, got his hips into it.dbf wrote:Looked like a cuffing/slap but did the damage alright!
Jackson walked right into it too.
Cant always blame the trainer. Cant polish a turd!!!dbf wrote:This got me thinking about Adam Booth as a trainer. Lee didn't look great if you ask me. I think Booth gets overated for his work with Haye. What was the best performance from one of his fighters (talking technically/tactically) against decent opposition?
I would have to say Haye v Maccarinelli - David did look sharp and good in that fight although it only lasted under 2 rounds. He looked poor against Fragomeni, Barrett, ok he did a good job on an ageing and battle worn Ruiz but really his punch is what has really mattered not his 'boxing ability'.
Groves too had flaws under booth that weren't refined. Lack of decent defence, engine etc.