Page 2 of 2

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 19:01
by lefty
jameswilson wrote:
Boxerbeetle123 wrote:
G0mez wrote:Someone on a another site said it was being discussed to be Smith vs Abraham / Clev vs Bellew II on PPV in a double-bill.

Could be horseshit but who knows..
Fvck that.
Can't for the life of me see how that would work. We're more or less in the same timezone with Germany unless they are only proposing showing the Smith v Abraham main event, in which case it isn't really 2 bills of boxing together.
UNLESS they're proposing Abraham fight Smith in Liverpool :wink:

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 21:49
by Ian1973
G0mez wrote:Someone on a another site said it was being discussed to be Smith vs Abraham / Clev vs Bellew II on PPV in a double-bill.

Could be horseshit but who knows..

I wouldn't pay for either of those fights nor them together.

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 14 Jul 2014, 03:16
by ste1983
If this is PPV I'll cancel my Sky subscription in disgust!

This is a good fight with genuine needle (it is genuine but I agree they were given a 'helping hand' Saturday) that will no doubt be hyped to hell by Sky but lets face it its not more than a domestic level fight is it?

In days gone by this may have been for a British title but in todays age of 'eliminators' I'm sure it'll be made for one of those.

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 14 Jul 2014, 03:45
by Bard of Boxrec
Is this a joke?

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 14 Jul 2014, 04:26
by MightyWarrior
I hope they make it pay-per-view, because no one would buy it, and the clowns at Sky would have to rethink about the B level crap they are being sold by matchroom.

Why would anyone buy PPV to see a couple of average domestic cruiserweights ? Bellew's wrestling let-me-at-him shtick is a good effort, but as we saw in the Stevenson fight, it means bugger all when the bell rings

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 14 Jul 2014, 04:35
by Bard of Boxrec
MightyWarrior wrote:I hope they make it pay-per-view, because no one would buy it, and the clowns at Sky would have to rethink about the B level crap they are being sold by matchroom.

Why would anyone buy PPV to see a couple of average domestic cruiserweights ? Bellew's wrestling let-me-at-him shtick is a good effort, but as we saw in the Stevenson fight, it means bugger all when the bell rings
+1. Total embarrassment if it's a PPV. Please do it Matchroom to show everyone how stupid you've been. 2,000 buys? Less?

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 14 Jul 2014, 06:04
by TopGun
jameswilson wrote:Do I think it's PPV? No.

Will it be PPV? Yes.

If this fight is PPV then I will seriously be peed off, no way PPV!!! Never ever and anyone who says it is 'don't know sh&t about boxing' (R.Mayweather Snr 2009)

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 14 Jul 2014, 07:16
by Counter-puncher
stacked undercard on the way

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 14 Jul 2014, 07:39
by chad
Counter-puncher wrote:stacked undercard on the way
If it's stacked full of 50/50 fights then great however if it's a repeat of Saturdays 80/20 MisMatchRoom card then no thanks.

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 14 Jul 2014, 08:22
by tony1234
I can't see the appeal of the fight outside boxing fans, both fighters been exposed at the highest level so at best it is a European Title fight and no matter how much WWE type hype it won't sell to the people who went to the Froch fight or bought that PPV. It's not like they need the PPV money to justify the purses in putting the fight on so if it went PPV it would bomb and deservedly so.

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 14 Jul 2014, 09:06
by Counter-puncher
chad wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:stacked undercard on the way
If it's stacked full of 50/50 fights then great however if it's a repeat of Saturdays 80/20 MisMatchRoom card then no thanks.
i was being sarcastic but don't worry I'll put it in '' '' next time

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 14 Jul 2014, 09:08
by palooka
MightyWarrior wrote:I hope they make it pay-per-view, because no one would buy it, and the clowns at Sky would have to rethink about the B level crap they are being sold by matchroom.

Why would anyone buy PPV to see a couple of average domestic cruiserweights ? Bellew's wrestling let-me-at-him shtick is a good effort, but as we saw in the Stevenson fight, it means bugger all when the bell rings
I agree 100%

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 14 Jul 2014, 15:40
by chad
Counter-puncher wrote:
chad wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:stacked undercard on the way
If it's stacked full of 50/50 fights then great however if it's a repeat of Saturdays 80/20 MisMatchRoom card then no thanks.
i was being sarcastic but don't worry I'll put it in '' '' next time
Please do, I'm a bit slow :doh:

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 15 Jul 2014, 18:32
by gooner_otis
Ofcourse Eddie Hearn will make this a PPV

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 15 Jul 2014, 21:37
by King Tubby
Last Saturday night in Liverpool wasn't sold out, was it?

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 16 Jul 2014, 01:14
by jameswilson
King Tubby wrote:Last Saturday night in Liverpool wasn't sold out, was it?
No. Apparently summer cards are tough to sell.

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 20 Jul 2014, 03:25
by tony1234
In todays Sun it is mentioned that Froch v Degale is about to be made with Cleverly v Bellew as chief support

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 20 Jul 2014, 04:47
by Emmseegee
I wouldnt be surprised to see Ricky Burns on such a bill as Hearn keeps saying about him fighting out of Scotland. If the show is in Liverpool then Burns v Matthews wouldnt surprise me.

Re: Is Clev/Bellew 2 going to be a PPV ?

Posted: 20 Jul 2014, 06:13
by ScottDetonator
If Bellew V Cleverly is PPV I, like most others posting here, will not be buying it. I can see the undercard all ready, Joshua v Rogan, Callum Smith v Tony Dodson, Kevin Mitchell in a final, final eliminator etc. etc.

Interesting to read that Froch v DeGale is in the works, not heard about that yet, seems a bit of a let down if true though. Froch is going backwards in opposition.