Page 2 of 5
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 22 Jul 2014, 11:37
by ikorolev
Porter started his professional career as a MW. Brook still has enough time to break his hand, get a cut or just say that he is expecting to fight Mayweather and withdraw like many of his fellow British fighters do :)
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 22 Jul 2014, 14:42
by diddy
Brook is one of the very very very very few world level British fighters. There just aren't many.
He's not beating Porter.
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 22 Jul 2014, 16:43
by tallsdav
DMA1987 wrote:Badhusker wrote:I watched Brook's last fight and just can't see him getting the best of Porter. He does not appear to be a real hard puncher, has so-so defense, is a decent boxer, but will have trouble when fighting in close I think. Porter, although short, is a pretty solid big welter that looks like he really cuts to get there. Brook to me looks like he could make 140 without too much trouble.
You must be high. He is very tight at the weight.
What makes you so confident he couldnt make 140?
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 22 Jul 2014, 17:55
by lefty
tallsdav wrote:DMA1987 wrote:Badhusker wrote:I watched Brook's last fight and just can't see him getting the best of Porter. He does not appear to be a real hard puncher, has so-so defense, is a decent boxer, but will have trouble when fighting in close I think. Porter, although short, is a pretty solid big welter that looks like he really cuts to get there. Brook to me looks like he could make 140 without too much trouble.
You must be high. He is very tight at the weight.
What makes you so confident he couldnt make 140?
Have you seen Kell's build? He's pretty stocky muscle wise. No way in hell could he make 140. He struggles with 147.
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 22 Jul 2014, 18:00
by DMA1987
tallsdav wrote:DMA1987 wrote:Badhusker wrote:I watched Brook's last fight and just can't see him getting the best of Porter. He does not appear to be a real hard puncher, has so-so defense, is a decent boxer, but will have trouble when fighting in close I think. Porter, although short, is a pretty solid big welter that looks like he really cuts to get there. Brook to me looks like he could make 140 without too much trouble.
You must be high. He is very tight at the weight.
What makes you so confident he couldnt make 140?
The fact that he doesn't easily make 147.
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 22 Jul 2014, 19:52
by Badhusker
I think to of his most recent weigh ins were 146 and 146.1 (Senchenko and Sldivia)
Must not struggle too much.
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 22 Jul 2014, 21:38
by lefty
Badhusker wrote:I think to of his most recent weigh ins were 146 and 146.1 (Senchenko and Sldivia)
Must not struggle too much.
That's probably because he boils himself down. Quite often guys that struggle with the weight tend to end up taking a bit too much off when they do weigh in.
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 23 Jul 2014, 00:02
by Badhusker
I will admit he does look pretty fit and trim in the weigh in picture I saw. Welter probably is a good weight for him. I would still guess that other than height, Porter will look like the bigger over-all guy, but I could be wrong.
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 16:36
by Kingfield
He can make 140, he just wouldn't want to. It requires discipline.
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 17:08
by hulkmaniac
There is supposed to be random drug testing, but Kell said so far he hasn't been tested.
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 24 Jul 2014, 18:11
by big train express
I like porter in this one
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 25 Jul 2014, 09:14
by drew kim
LOL @ the guy that said Kell could make 140, he has a VERY HARD TIME making 147!
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 25 Jul 2014, 09:46
by Counter-puncher
tallsdav wrote:DMA1987 wrote:Badhusker wrote:I watched Brook's last fight and just can't see him getting the best of Porter. He does not appear to be a real hard puncher, has so-so defense, is a decent boxer, but will have trouble when fighting in close I think. Porter, although short, is a pretty solid big welter that looks like he really cuts to get there. Brook to me looks like he could make 140 without too much trouble.
You must be high. He is very tight at the weight.
What makes you so confident he couldnt make 140?
he's a sheffield fan, these guys pretty much live inside Brook's jockstrap. i'd take his word on Brook's weight above most opinions on this board
( ;;-) @ dma)
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 25 Jul 2014, 09:49
by Counter-puncher
Badhusker wrote:I think to of his most recent weigh ins were 146 and 146.1 (Senchenko and Sldivia)
Must not struggle too much.
ever heard the phrase 'nose-dive at the weight'?
example: McLellan weighed in something like 165lbs for the Nigel Benn fight
now i know you're knowledgeable enough to know McLellan was a big big guy @ 168lbs, so.....

Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 30 Jul 2014, 12:31
by Ettt9350
Does anyone expect there to be a surge of patriotic money wagered on Kell Brook as the fight draws closer?
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 30 Jul 2014, 13:35
by Chepppaaa
tough one hard to tell a winner...brook by ud...but it is realy a close fight. both prime. porter got more power, brook is more athletic..very tough fight, whoever wins makes a big big statemant
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 31 Jul 2014, 22:55
by tennessee
Shawn Showtime Porter all day. have not seen Brook fight but the vegetable Kale is horrible.
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 31 Jul 2014, 23:53
by lefty
tennessee wrote:Shawn Showtime Porter all day. have not seen Brook fight but the vegetable Kale is horrible.
LOL
![[icon_e_confused.gif] :confused:](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 01 Aug 2014, 00:18
by Badhusker
You know this fight is one I am very much looking forward to. Brook needs a signature win, and if he beats Porter, it will vault him into other big money fights. 32-0 but basically untested against elite guys. Porter, on the other hand may end up being the fringe contender or prove his elite status by beating Brook down. He certainly has the advantage in more important wins so far.
If it is a close fight, more questions arise I guess. Looking forward to it.
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 01 Aug 2014, 02:23
by Sklar
Ettt9350 wrote:Does anyone expect there to be a surge of patriotic money wagered on Kell Brook as the fight draws closer?
Not really. Brook isn't known in the UK like some of the other fighters who have gone over to the States. He's very much under the radar.
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 01 Aug 2014, 06:11
by bigB
Height wise Brook is 5ft 9 and Porter 5ft 7 with the same reach 69 inch.
Porter looks top heavy but those wild lunging hooks were dangerous and that is what Brook needs to counter. If Porter lunges misses and is hit Brook stops him.
Not in a million years would Brook make 140lbs - Picture from a previous camp and this was weeks out before the fight.
Brook wins via mid-late stoppage and I am lumping cash on him
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 01 Aug 2014, 06:40
by lefty
bigB wrote:Height wise Brook is 5ft 9 and Porter 5ft 7 with the same reach 69 inch.
Porter looks top heavy but those wild lunging hooks were dangerous and that is what Brook needs to counter. If Porter lunges misses and is hit Brook stops him.
Not in a million years would Brook make 140lbs - Picture from a previous camp and this was weeks out before the fight.
Brook wins via mid-late stoppage and I am lumping cash on him
Porter is more like 5'5/5'6 I reckon. He's pretty bloody short. I imagine Kell will dwarf him somewhat in that department.
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 01 Aug 2014, 09:07
by crusader
One thing that interests me about this fight is that I think each of them has shown weaknesses that the other is particularly suited to exploit. In my view Porter's somewhat wild, lunging offensive makes him vulnerable to the accurate, sharp counters of Brook, while Brook's history of fading seems to reflect stamina problems that will be especially problematic against an energetic fighter with a good engine like Porter. By extension I think Brook would have a tougher time crawling back from a deficit and therefore it's more important for him to start strong.
I'm very excited for this one as each has impressed me and I think there will be drama.
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 01 Aug 2014, 10:40
by observer1
Kell Brook's been fighting since 2004. It's amazing it's taken him this long to get a decent fight. I'm pretty sure he had some part to play in that....
Re: Shawn Porter vs Kell Brook
Posted: 01 Aug 2014, 13:08
by drunkenpiper36
I like Shawn Porter in this one.