Re: I fear for Froch's safety
Posted: 22 Aug 2014, 10:39
You said 'you are a boxer'. If it's a hobby then you are not a boxerKaaspeer wrote:Danconnollyeire, why would I have that? I'm not a proffesional, I just do it as a hobby.
You said 'you are a boxer'. If it's a hobby then you are not a boxerKaaspeer wrote:Danconnollyeire, why would I have that? I'm not a proffesional, I just do it as a hobby.
You don't play boxingdanconnollyeire wrote:You said 'you are a boxer'. If it's a hobby then you are not a boxerKaaspeer wrote:Danconnollyeire, why would I have that? I'm not a proffesional, I just do it as a hobby.
Kaaspeer wrote:f4ggot".
It's the internet, dude, you don't have to be sad about it.danamba7 wrote:Kaaspeer wrote:f4ggot".:(
Trust me, I'm not.Kaaspeer wrote:It's the internet, dude, you don't have to be sad about it.danamba7 wrote:Kaaspeer wrote:f4ggot".:(
Blood vessels deteriorate with age, increasing the risk of brain injury.ReggieDiggs wrote:Show me any stats that older fighters have a larger risk than peak or young fighters.Kaaspeer wrote:Froch is a strong warrior, but even the hardest of walls will crack with age in the face of continous attacks...
If you walk into a ring to fight the moment the bell rings your odds to take serious or deadly damage just went up drastically regardless of age or how many fight youve had.
Yeah, I'd hardly compare him to LaMotta - he's taken some lumps, but it's not like he's been on the receiving end of countless beatings, more often than not, he's been handing them out.handsofstone wrote:Apart from both the Kessler fights and the first Groves fight,Froch hasnt been in that many wars anyhow,Ward and Taylor were successful but they werent going to town on Carl,most of the demolition jobs in his career were waged by him
He is the wrong person to ask, he literally wants to bum Froch, or may he already has.palooka wrote:There's a fellow on the British and Irish forum called GOmez who knows Froch personally; I'm sure he'd be able to allay your fears or pass your concerns on.