Re: next scottish challengres
Posted: 09 Sep 2014, 12:16
There is no guarentee of anything when it comes to politics, always what I was taught
im sure that bronze masters belt holds yore trousers up great lol i could have guesed youd vote yes too so you can have more excuses. dont worry im sure kris hughes will beat you for scottish title aftre gettin beat from troy james. your not even the best fightre in dundee. i watched the light middlweght mike towel and he is fast and can punch. a relly exciting prospect from dundeeRonnie Clark wrote:I don't need no belts I have plenty of them ;) I can still fight the champions :)
P.S belts are only for holding up ur trousers x
lol vote yes and what exactly will we get. someone else spendin my hard earned cash that doesnt have to work for it. maybe you know more on this subject but you dont know boxing and i doubt you know the ins and outs of what votin yes might do to the country. but im sure if you keep watchin braveheart it will make everything make senseJamieM wrote:Ronnie vote no so you can fight for a British title, idiots , more to life than a boxing title
Wont argue with that.JamieM wrote:Most politicians are ! English ones are just as bad if not worse,
Great Britain is made up of England, Scotland and Wales, Scotland will still be in Britain, just not the UK, no need to change anything.Sklar wrote:I don't think they'll vote 'yes', but if they do, my opinion is that they should not be allowed to fight for the Lonsdale belt. In addition, I think that all Scottish boxers should have their BBBofC licenses instantly revoked. You're either with us or against us.keirw wrote:If Scotland becomes independent later this month will Scotish fighters still be able to fight for the Lonsdale belt?
That's up for debate. As I understand it the current legal position is that in the event of a 'yes' vote, Scots will be able to maintain dual nationality, as will the unborn children of all Scots alive at the time of the vote. The children of those children will not be British, however, as dual nationality may only be passed down one generation.expe wrote:Great Britain is made up of England, Scotland and Wales, Scotland will still be in Britain, just not the UK, no need to change anything.Sklar wrote:I don't think they'll vote 'yes', but if they do, my opinion is that they should not be allowed to fight for the Lonsdale belt. In addition, I think that all Scottish boxers should have their BBBofC licenses instantly revoked. You're either with us or against us.keirw wrote:If Scotland becomes independent later this month will Scotish fighters still be able to fight for the Lonsdale belt?
That seems like having your cake and eating it to me.Sklar wrote:That's up for debate. As I understand it the current legal position is that in the event of a 'yes' vote, Scots will be able to maintain dual nationality, as will the unborn children of all Scots alive at the time of the vote. The children of those children will not be British, however, as dual nationality may only be passed down one generation.expe wrote:Great Britain is made up of England, Scotland and Wales, Scotland will still be in Britain, just not the UK, no need to change anything.Sklar wrote:
I don't think they'll vote 'yes', but if they do, my opinion is that they should not be allowed to fight for the Lonsdale belt. In addition, I think that all Scottish boxers should have their BBBofC licenses instantly revoked. You're either with us or against us.
i aint michael or michael snr lol i would love that match up though because michaels boxing skillz would make ronnie look silly. maybe they can fight when ronnie has somethin worth fightin for because he brings nothin to the table. so you are tellin me that only the fights ive seen are the ones he looked baddaviddee wrote:Haha voting Yes has nothing to do with boxing.. Do you think the BBofBC are gonna say we don't want your licence fees anymore from all Scottish boxers.. Ha more chance of David Cameron being popular in Scotland.. As for your list of fighters most would probably admit themselves that Ronnie is ahead of them and is a good boxer.. Seems to be some kind of problem here your name is boxing brain and you seem to lack brains.. Ronnie has beat everyone who has been put in front of him. And in most peoples opinion he beat Walsh and Hughes.. Ronnie would fight anyone that's fact. Your pushing Michael Roberts so I'm guessing you either are him or your his old man.. Ronnie has tried to get that fight for years had always been refused.. I have seen everyone of Ronnie's pro fights and been at them all live.. The ones you have seen both came to survive and hold on against Ronnie.. He won both confortably. My advice to you is change your name on here you look a tad silly
He would beat everyone you have mentioned.. Some aren't even at his weight. You don't have a clue. You have your own agenda which is fair enough but your coming over like a silly trollBoxing Brains wrote:i dont rate ronnie clark so i am a troll lol it is my opinion thta he couldnt beat the names mentioned so time will tell. tell me which ones you thnik he can beat
I've seen Ronnie spar Michael Roberts and he wasn't made to look silly. Michael is a good boxer but Ronnie too big and strong for him. As for nothing to the table? Ronnie is the top ranked super feather in Scotland at the minute. That's why he's in a eliminator. Fighters like Ricky Burns and Kid Galahad don't ask for sparring from rubbish boxersBoxing Brains wrote:i aint michael or michael snr lol i would love that match up though because michaels boxing skillz would make ronnie look silly. maybe they can fight when ronnie has somethin worth fightin for because he brings nothin to the table. so you are tellin me that only the fights ive seen are the ones he looked baddaviddee wrote:Haha voting Yes has nothing to do with boxing.. Do you think the BBofBC are gonna say we don't want your licence fees anymore from all Scottish boxers.. Ha more chance of David Cameron being popular in Scotland.. As for your list of fighters most would probably admit themselves that Ronnie is ahead of them and is a good boxer.. Seems to be some kind of problem here your name is boxing brain and you seem to lack brains.. Ronnie has beat everyone who has been put in front of him. And in most peoples opinion he beat Walsh and Hughes.. Ronnie would fight anyone that's fact. Your pushing Michael Roberts so I'm guessing you either are him or your his old man.. Ronnie has tried to get that fight for years had always been refused.. I have seen everyone of Ronnie's pro fights and been at them all live.. The ones you have seen both came to survive and hold on against Ronnie.. He won both confortably. My advice to you is change your name on here you look a tad sillywhat woulkd be the odds on that but the ones i havent seen he is a slick amazin boxer lol you are unreal
most of the boxers would fight ronnie at super feather. i have spoke to most of them and i can only tel wht has been said to me. you have your own agenda of stickin up for him but wait till he needs to fight some of these guys. real boxers born and bred loldaviddee wrote:He would beat everyone you have mentioned.. Some aren't even at his weight. You don't have a clue. You have your own agenda which is fair enough but your coming over like a silly trollBoxing Brains wrote:i dont rate ronnie clark so i am a troll lol it is my opinion thta he couldnt beat the names mentioned so time will tell. tell me which ones you thnik he can beat
Ha you have spoke to them?? I've been there when fights offered to their managers.. Ask yourself why the fights haven't happened im not away to bad mouth fighters. I actually like most of the ones you have said but in fairness you have no idea of levels. Boxers think they can beat other boxers. It's all bravado it's the sport.. Proofs in the puddingBoxing Brains wrote:most of the boxers would fight ronnie at super feather. i have spoke to most of them and i can only tel wht has been said to me. you have your own agenda of stickin up for him but wait till he needs to fight some of these guys. real boxers born and bred loldaviddee wrote:He would beat everyone you have mentioned.. Some aren't even at his weight. You don't have a clue. You have your own agenda which is fair enough but your coming over like a silly trollBoxing Brains wrote:i dont rate ronnie clark so i am a troll lol it is my opinion thta he couldnt beat the names mentioned so time will tell. tell me which ones you thnik he can beat
Anyone born before the referendum will be allowed to keep their British passport, normal citizenship rules will apply for anyone born after.Sklar wrote:That's up for debate. As I understand it the current legal position is that in the event of a 'yes' vote, Scots will be able to maintain dual nationality, as will the unborn children of all Scots alive at the time of the vote. The children of those children will not be British, however, as dual nationality may only be passed down one generation.expe wrote:Great Britain is made up of England, Scotland and Wales, Scotland will still be in Britain, just not the UK, no need to change anything.Sklar wrote: I don't think they'll vote 'yes', but if they do, my opinion is that they should not be allowed to fight for the Lonsdale belt. In addition, I think that all Scottish boxers should have their BBBofC licenses instantly revoked. You're either with us or against us.
that will be tough of him. pull them up in public lol im sure that would get him a fight withg themJamieM wrote:Listen you are now quoting these boxers and you clearly don't know ronnie as he isn't a troll like you, he will pull everyone if the fighters up
In public and ask if they want the fight, surely you can say who you are if you want to quote conversations? Ronnie has performed poor in many fights but that born and bred that you mentions he has, do you? Ryan Walsh is the worst he has fought Nd still should have won, would Michael Roberts fight Ryan Walsh? Featherweight now I guarentee he wouldn't