BoxRec

lefty wrote:I've just watched a bit of catterall for the first time and my initial thoughts are that he seems to be thinker in the ring. He's not just a hard hitter I dont think. One thing i did notice though is that he seems a little static. Doesnt seem like he has the quickest feet. Stalker might give him problems in that regard possibly. He looks decent though. Should be an intriguing one.

I agree entirely there fella.
I should imagine they have worked on his foot speed or he may well be boxed to death by stalker.
Like the way he doesn't waste many shots though and looks to throw some wicked hooks to either side of the body.
Jacks being labelled as the puncher/brawler here but the kid can box make no mistake.

BOYOVERTHEHILL wrote:

lefty wrote:I've just watched a bit of catterall for the first time and my initial thoughts are that he seems to be thinker in the ring. He's not just a hard hitter I dont think. One thing i did notice though is that he seems a little static. Doesnt seem like he has the quickest feet. Stalker might give him problems in that regard possibly. He looks decent though. Should be an intriguing one.

I agree entirely there fella.
I should imagine they have worked on his foot speed or he may well be boxed to death by stalker.
Like the way he doesn't waste many shots though and looks to throw some wicked hooks to either side of the body.
Jacks being labelled as the puncher/brawler here but the kid can box make no mistake.

Yeah he seems pretty measured and that knockout against (ive forgotten his name lol) was brutal.

Khan wanted Catterall as his spar in America ahead of Collazo.

He's been in camp doing round after round with Joan Guzman and Argenis Mendez. Sparred Kell Brook and dozens of rounds with fellow southpaw Jamie Cox, who's a bit of a puncher and much bigger.

Those picking stalker easy, must be Liverpudlians , because victory is nowhere near assured in this one - which makes it so interesting.

G0mez wrote:Khan wanted Catterall as his spar in America ahead of Collazo.

He's been in camp doing round after round with Joan Guzman and Argenis Mendez. Sparred Kell Brook and dozens of rounds with fellow southpaw Jamie Cox, who's a bit of a puncher and much bigger.

Those picking stalker easy, must be Liverpudlians , because victory is nowhere near assured in this one - which makes it so interesting.

Some quality sparring there.

He's def highly regarded and they have invested time and £££ in him.
Time to repay the faith Jack.
I think we have seen Stalker at his near best.....I think we have seen nowhere near Jacks best yet.
Pretty confident that we will see him shine tomorrow.
Good luck young un.

So... What's the betting call on this one?

lefty wrote:I've just watched a bit of catterall for the first time and my initial thoughts are that he seems to be thinker in the ring. He's not just a hard hitter I dont think. One thing i did notice though is that he seems a little static. Doesnt seem like he has the quickest feet. Stalker might give him problems in that regard possibly. He looks decent though. Should be an intriguing one.

I am sure I read somewhere from catteral's team that stalker was going to get schooled, some confidence there.

Did I mishear the interview on Bunce's show last night, or has Catterall previously ko'd Stalker in sparring?

Catterall to win this easily.

Boxerbeetle wrote:Did I mishear the interview on Bunce's show last night, or has Catterall previously ko'd Stalker in sparring?

Lefty would surely have heard about this. So no.

Ouch

James, close your legs. Your vagina is showing ;)

Great match but I'm confident that Catteral will win this. Stalker will need to up his game considerably to do enough. Jack has a good team behind him and I've been underwhelmed by Tom as a pro.

Boxerbeetle wrote:Stalker looked an average amateur & looks quite a poor pro, can't see him going far at all.

Before this fight starts, I'd just like to apologise for the above comment - I'd had a fair few beers before posting so went over the top. For the record, I'm still not convinced Stalker will be a successful pro due to his style & lack of power, but to say he was an average amateur was very poor form on my part, didn't think it through before posting.

Showing some class there beetle

In some ways I admire it a little more when a light hitting boxer does well, it shows their mastery of the art; saying that I like to watch the hitters.

palooka wrote:Showing some class there beetle

In some ways I admire it a little more when a light hitting boxer does well, it shows their mastery of the art; saying that I like to watch the hitters.

Ha, I'm a classy guy!

Seriously though, nothing winds me up more than when an armchair fan levels unfair criticism at a professional, particularly when it comes to boxing. I felt a bit embarrassed about it, so an apology was definitely due (especially when Stalker seems like such a sound guy anyway). Still think he'll lose tonight mind you, but it's nothing personal, just think Catterall will grind him down.

Boxerbeetle wrote:

Boxerbeetle wrote:Stalker looked an average amateur & looks quite a poor pro, can't see him going far at all.

Before this fight starts, I'd just like to apologise for the above comment - I'd had a fair few beers before posting so went over the top. For the record, I'm still not convinced Stalker will be a successful pro due to his style & lack of power, but to say he was an average amateur was very poor form on my part, didn't think it through before posting.

This might be worth a thought. Stalker and Catterall are both southpaws. Stalker will have faced many top southpaws in his international career as many top international amateur boxers are southpaws. It can sometimes unsettle a southpaw when they face one of their own evil brethren.

I think Stalker may adapt to this better given his experience. It looks as though Catterall carries the power but again Stalker will have met some bangers over his long amateur career.

If Stalker can show he has adapted to the pros stamina wise, I think he wins this.

It's a hard one to gauge. I'd probably go with Stalker on points but with no real conviction.

lefty wrote:It's a hard one to gauge. I'd probably go with Stalker on points but with no real conviction.

Uh oh lefty....looks like we backed the wrong horse on this one.....

Broomhall wrote:

lefty wrote:It's a hard one to gauge. I'd probably go with Stalker on points but with no real conviction.

Uh oh lefty....looks like we backed the wrong horse on this one.....

Just a bit huh haha.

He stopped Stalker in 8 rounds?

Beard is a studious trainer and when I interviewed them both a few weeks ago they said they'd wipe him out, no points win.

How did it fair? I'm away and haven't watched it.

lefty wrote:

Broomhall wrote:

lefty wrote:It's a hard one to gauge. I'd probably go with Stalker on points but with no real conviction.

Uh oh lefty....looks like we backed the wrong horse on this one.....

Just a bit huh haha.

Come on , that's not fair. Lefty did say he had no conviction in the result. It's not like he said 'bet your house on it'

G0mez wrote:He stopped Stalker in 8 rounds?

Beard is a studious trainer and when I interviewed them both a few weeks ago they said they'd wipe him out, no points win.

How did it fair? I'm away and haven't watched it.

Stalker down in first and second, came back into it over the next few rounds as Catterall kept his hands at home a bit too often, then had a better 8th round and landed a beauty of the left hand towards the end, rocked Stalker, followed up on the ropes, towel came in as the ref stopped it. Catterall's timing was excellent, couldn't miss with the jab and straight left and he was happy to stand in the middle of the ring and box with Stalker and more than held his own. At 21 Catterall is a fantastic prospect, as long as they don't rush him he's got a big future ahead of him.

Cheers mate.

Journo's without a clue saying 'bad night' and 'upset' - nope, Catterall can fight.