BoxRec

Riddick Blowe wrote:Sorry about the sand in your vagina. In my opinion Joshua will have little trouble with Fury should they meet. Of course if he does dispatch Tyson with ease you're probably going to claim you saw it coming, since you're clearly never wrong despite you stating the contrary all the fornicating time on here, such as the last post you made regarding Darren Dyer and Errol Christie

Fixed that post for you, don't mention it

Oh yeah, except about Kovalev...but you weren't even wrong about him, were you, since he was befuddling Kovalev so much in his shutout loss

A broken clock is right twice a day Riddick Blowe, don't get too smug, your mancrush beat a smaller man who was nearly 20 years his senior, glad you are easily impressed though boxing is all about the long game.

Oh right. You're mad because I didn't say 'in my opinion'.

Maybe there are better things to get angry about. Just a thought. No, no idea about the Errol Christie nonsense you mentioned either.

I wasn't even talking about my own predictions for Kovalev, I was talking about the fact you refused to give any credit to him whatsoever when he proved you wrong, when virtually the entire boxing world could appreciate a great performance.

Riddick Blowe wrote:Oh right. You're mad because I didn't say 'in my opinion'.

Maybe there are better things to get angry about. Just a thought. No, no idea about the Errol Christie nonsense you mentioned either.

I wasn't even talking about my own predictions for Kovalev, I was talking about the fact you refused to give any credit to him whatsoever when virtually the entire boxing world could appreciate a great performance.

You have to state it as such and not be so arrogant as to assume the KO'ing of Fury by Joshua is a known fact or a definite certainty - because it is not.

I am not angry, I am laughing at your uber-optimistic fanboyism for certain fighters - it is cute, I used to be all in a tizzle over Frank Bruno when I was your age so I get it, just as well the internet wasn't around when I was a kid, I would have spammed these forums like nobody's business about Bruno, Dennis Andries and Najib Daho.

As for Kovalev, when he puts in a shift against someone his natural weight who is in the ascendancy then he will get credit from me - no worries about that.

Rather my perceived arrogance or enthusiasm over your delusion and condescension.

Looks like Kovalev will never get your approval then because he is ABSOLUTELY PEERLESS!

Oops, there I go again.

Riddick Blowe wrote:Rather my perceived arrogance or enthusiasm over your delusion and condescension.

The beating of Fury by Joshua has yet to be proved seeing as they have yet to fight so you need to qualify your statements
as such, that is all. Anybody who has any clue about boxing knows this.

Looks like Kovalev will never get your approval then because he is ABSOLUTELY PEERLESS!

Oops, there I go again.

See, this is what I am on about - no idea at all...

Kovalev could get KO'd in his next fight and you will look a berk - this is boxing - anything can happen. :geek2:

Mate, it's just semantics. I can't believe I'm still arguing about this. I'm sure some other doofus has been on my case about it before with their knowing crowing.

What can I say, I don't sit on the fence. A lot of people on the British Scene do. Put your cards on the table, don't be afraid of looking a berk!

lefty wrote:career than Wladimir Klitschko? There's a lot of Wlad critics out there because of the style of which he fights and also the excessive holding and such at times but i'm curious, do you you believe Joshua will go on to be a better and more successful fighter?

No. I doubt it. Its a huge ask. Klits run over the last 10 years may not be emulated any time soon. Im not a huge fan of Joshua (or should I say the massive hype that comes with him. Non of his doing mind. He actually seems a really nice chap) but he did look impressive last time out. I'll reserve judgment until he's against an opponent that's there to win and more importantly tests big Tony's whiskers as I get the feeling it'll all end the in tears when he gets tagged properly.

Riddick Blowe wrote:Mate, it's just semantics. I can't believe I'm still arguing about this. I'm sure some other doofus has been on my case about it before with their knowing crowing.

It is not a case of semantics at all, you can still signify your confidence of a Joshua a win without stating it as fact or a foregone conclusion which is just wrong seeing as they have yet to fight. The only doofus around here is you.

What can I say, I don't sit on the fence. A lot of people on the British Scene do. Put your cards on the table, don't be afraid of looking a berk!

Fine, all you have to do in the future is qualify your statements correctly and you won't come out looking like a doofus fanboy.

Talented but will not dominate.

Peter Fury hit the nail squarely on the head in one of his IFL interviews... PR bullshit

Fat Git wrote:
It is not a case of semantics at all, you can still signify your confidence of a Joshua a win without stating it as fact or a foregone conclusion which is just wrong seeing as they have yet to fight. The only doofus around here is you.

OK, I need to confirm to people I haven't actually travelled forward in time to watch the fight in advance, got it.

Riddick Blowe wrote:

Fat Git wrote:
It is not a case of semantics at all, you can still signify your confidence of a Joshua a win without stating it as fact or a foregone conclusion which is just wrong seeing as they have yet to fight. The only doofus around here is you.

OK, I need to confirm to people I haven't actually travelled forward in time to watch the fight in advance, got it.

Good.

Depends on the competition. IMO, if Joshua gets the same type of guys that Wlad has had, definitely. I could say the same thing about Holyfield, Tyson, Bowe, and Lewis.

The klitchkos are very skillfull & I'm sorry to say that Joshua ain't that skillfull imo. I believe he'll improve but not to there standard