BoxRec

lillywhite14 wrote:Pulev was ordered a little time before any mention of a Haye fight. Haye fits their bill, no risk unless it's for enough money to retire on, unless it's a title fight.

What is your point? Fury didn't duck Pulev, end of story.

lillywhite14 wrote:He was right to be suspicious that Ustinov was in shape? If any fight is made between them should Ustinov sign a promise not to train too hard or take it too seriously?

lillywhite14 wrote:Fury frustrates me. You are blinded by your love for him.

You are blinded by hate.

Pulev, if he sticks to actually boxing rather than doing what he tried against Klitschko, would have better success.

However, when you have a man who outweighs you by some 30-40 pounds and has such a reach and can box rather well and has a damn good punch (Fury) I can't help but think that in the rounds ahead, Pulev would get tired from the body shots, the leaning/clinching and all around high volume jabs which will only continue to frustrate and to slowly break a man down--- and would probably be stopped in 10-11 rounds.

After what we just witnessed against Chisora--- Fury staying in one gear all night, throwing mostly jabs at the WBO #1 ranked heavyweight--- I don't think its much of a stretch at all, to say Fury could do the same in a somewhat more competitive fight with Pulev. But, I don't believe it will be the Bulgarian against Fury in February--- because he was chosen before to fight Fury, and Tyson said he was a nobody (and he opted for Haye instead) and now that mystique that Pulev had is now gone because he was so outclassed and dominated by Klitschko.

Horse wrote:

lillywhite14 wrote:Pulev was ordered a little time before any mention of a Haye fight. Haye fits their bill, no risk unless it's for enough money to retire on, unless it's a title fight.

What is your point? Fury didn't duck Pulev, end of story.

lillywhite14 wrote:He was right to be suspicious that Ustinov was in shape? If any fight is made between them should Ustinov sign a promise not to train too hard or take it too seriously?

lillywhite14 wrote:Fury frustrates me. You are blinded by your love for him.

You are blinded by hate.

I think Pulev could be a force in the post-Klitschko era, if he works on his head movement.

lefty wrote:

hurricanemitch14 wrote:Pulev sucks..................not only did he get his ass kicked last time out......he struggled big time against Travis Walker. Walker gets ko'd every time he steps up except when he fought Pulev. Pulev would get his ass beat against Fury also.

Fury has struggled against some pretty shitty fighters along the way aswell though.

You're right....I should have clarified.....I brought up the Pulev because a lot of people on here rates Pulev right after Wlad even after his ass beating. A very overrated fighter.

Fury is a fun and very beatable Heavyweight. Fury has that Broner type personality.....u know it sucks.

I like Fury , and don't like Pulev as people but if Pulev isn't damaged goods after the Klitschko beat down I would go with Pulev that dude is just too tough, only some serious fire power like Wlad has could put this beast away, I don't think Fury has that kind of offense.