Re: Barry Hearn needs to step in to help Eddie...
Posted: 03 Feb 2015, 17:36
I personally don't think Eddie can deliver an equivalent of Benn-Gman or Hatton-Kostya. Fights where you've got to dig deep into the pockets.
I`m not saying I fully disagree with you and this might not be quite on that level but getting Bute over at that time was a bit stroke,but that was a long time ago and Froch had to take small money for the fight.At the time Bute was seen as a destroyer who was going to end Froch,to get the fight over here before the proposed second fight which would of been over there was a great move and proberly the best deal he has done,but that was 3 years ago now.mickey1975 wrote:I personally don't think Eddie can deliver an equivalent of Benn-Gman or Hatton-Kostya. Fights where you've got to dig deep into the pockets.
Were viewing figures ever published for this fight?bluenoseshf wrote: I wouldnt pay 50p to watch that fight but hundreds of thousands of people payed £15, if that isnt wonderful promoting i dont know what is.
bluenoseshf wrote:Manchester Hitman wrote:Eddie is struggling badly and failing to deliver in anything big sadly..Before some of the usual suspects such as James Wilson come on to try to laugh me off the forum (even though I've made a fool of him & others retrospectively on so many occasions by pretty much always being proven correct of my criticisms of fast car and my views that he can't make big fights etc) I'm not going the usual route to try to bash Eddie but I'm just trying to find suggestions on how the big fights that we are all desperate to see can take place.
Just by this latest 'twitter beef' between Eddie & George Groves fast car has still not learned his lesson with how to treat big name fighters and their egos especially as he badly needs them so he can deliver on his remit to his fighters and also sky who clearly want PPVs and big fights etc.
it's no coincidence that Khan, Frampton/Mcguigan, Groves, even the Eubanks Etc none of them seem to even like Eddie which makes negotiations almost impossible in fact he winds all 3 of the formers up completely- Eubank Snr refused to deal with him & only wanted to consider working with Matchroom through Barry.
Eddie possibly mainly due to his upbringing which obviously isn't his 'fault' lacks the natural ability of his dad & the Warren's etc to deal with these fighters and do what is necessary to get the job done...it might be that touch of working class stock that enabled Barry & Frank two classic examples of that era to hustle and fight their way up through the old establishment right to the top-both have a ruthless Streak as we all know and both have that ability to charm their way to getting what they want. Eddie is brilliant in a marketing sense and the work he has done delivering boxing across the UK at that particular level is fantastic but he can't get things done with the big boys.
Back to my original point..even if
It's privately we need Barry to step in
And sort out the fights as George suggested to Eddie in the twitter exchanges. Eddie can still be the public face for the media for the negotiations but let Barry get the actual business done FFS.
I fail to see how he is struggling. Fair enough he isnt popluar with hardcore boxing fans, but thats not his job. His job is to make as much money for himself and his fighters as possible. No one can deny he isnt doing that.
I mean getting more than 10 people to buy the Bellew vs Cleverly PPV would deserve an induction to the hall of fame. I wouldnt pay 50p to watch that fight but hundreds of thousands of people payed £15, if that isnt wonderful promoting i dont know what is.
Are you sure Parson? Hitman seems pretty certain.Parson Cross wrote:Brook would have been part of the ppv package had the Froch Chavez fight gone ahead as a double header.
The Brook fight was initially slated for 21/3 and as a stand alone bill was NEVER talked about as being ppv.
He heard from his imaginary friends.DMA1987 wrote:Are you sure Parson? Hitman seems pretty certain.Parson Cross wrote:Brook would have been part of the ppv package had the Froch Chavez fight gone ahead as a double header.
The Brook fight was initially slated for 21/3 and as a stand alone bill was NEVER talked about as being ppv.
Thanks for the confirmationParson Cross wrote:Brook would have been part of the ppv package had the Froch Chavez fight gone ahead as a double header.
The Brook fight was initially slated for 21/3 and as a stand alone bill was NEVER talked about as being ppv.
I enjoyed this video, thanks.Manchester Hitman wrote:An oldie we've all seen but relevant to the topic...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_HhNftH9l-k