BoxRec

95gerog wrote:Big question is, can they stick together if he loses!! Usually there's a scape goat somewhere in camps.

I wouldn't worry about that, the furys are an unbelievably close lot.

Poor old mick'll get it in the neck instead

He's not a feather duster man. He was the best man at the Auction and there was not a man born from his mother who could match him in a dirty go. Love it.

forcefraser wrote:He's not a feather duster man. He was the best man at the Auction and there was not a man born from his mother who could match him in a dirty go. Love it.

stevieb_8006 wrote:I always felt john was a negative influence on tysons career. Thought he encouraged the cocky, ego driven side of it. "I can beat any man" and all that nonsense. Also thought he put a lot of extra pressure on Tyson by comparing him to great fighters and saying he's a world champ guaranteed. Hope he doesn't upset the applecart for Peter more than anything, he's worked hard on moulding Tyson and doesn't deserve to be pushed aside now.

Agree with this. His dad was saying he was a bigger hitter than Foreman

stevieb_8006 wrote:Poor old mick'll get it in the neck instead

Good luck finding it! Mick's got himself covered (literally) in that department.

stevieb_8006 wrote:

95gerog wrote:Big question is, can they stick together if he loses!! Usually there's a scape goat somewhere in camps.

I wouldn't worry about that, the furys are an unbelievably close lot.

Poor old mick'll get it in the neck instead

Haha, I reckon you'll be right there.

I think that Peter is head of the family and therefore head of training, however any change to the current set up could de-stabilise the camp at a crucial time in Tysons career - and this is an example of such a change.

bripez wrote:I think that Peter is head of the family and therefore head of training, however any change to the current set up could de-stabilise the camp at a crucial time in Tysons career - and this is an example of such a change.

Why do you think that? John is older and he's Tyson's dad, he will have the final say if he wants it. Hopefully, he just leaves it to Peter.

mickey1975 wrote:

bripez wrote:I think that Peter is head of the family and therefore head of training, however any change to the current set up could de-stabilise the camp at a crucial time in Tysons career - and this is an example of such a change.

Why do you think that? John is older and he's Tyson's dad, he will have the final say if he wants it. Hopefully, he just leaves it to Peter.

You are the traveller wannabe mate - are you saying that John is the head of the family and not Peter ?

bripez wrote:

mickey1975 wrote:

bripez wrote:I think that Peter is head of the family and therefore head of training, however any change to the current set up could de-stabilise the camp at a crucial time in Tysons career - and this is an example of such a change.

Why do you think that? John is older and he's Tyson's dad, he will have the final say if he wants it. Hopefully, he just leaves it to Peter.

You are the traveller wannabe mate - are you saying that John is the head of the family and not Peter ?

??? I don't know if there is a 'head'! Do the family vote on it?

mickey1975 wrote: ??? I don't know if there is a 'head'! Do the family vote on it?

I don't know mate - you tell me (you appear to be the forum expert on these matters).

bripez wrote:

mickey1975 wrote: ??? I don't know if there is a 'head'! Do the family vote on it?

I don't know mate - you tell me (you appear to be the forum expert on these matters).

Why? Because I've admitted i have got friends who are travellers? Is it a crime? I have no idea why so many people on here are so offended that someone they have never met is friendly with some travellers! Mental.

mickey1975 wrote:

bripez wrote:

mickey1975 wrote: ??? I don't know if there is a 'head'! Do the family vote on it?

I don't know mate - you tell me (you appear to be the forum expert on these matters).

Why? Because I've admitted i have got friends who are travellers? Is it a crime? I have no idea why so many people on here are so offended that someone they have never met is friendly with some travellers! Mental.

Is what a crime ?
Who is offended ? (at what ?)

I said that you appear to be the expert on these matters as without exception you comment on every single thread that contains the word "traveller".

Previously I said that "I think" that Peter is head of the family and training for Tyson and you appeared to disagree - am I missing something ?

Yes. I asked why you presumed he was. I thought you must have some insight. Why is Peter the 'head' of the family?

mickey1975 wrote:Yes. I asked why you presumed he was. I thought you must have some insight. Why is Peter the 'head' of the family?

Are you saying he isn't ?

I didn't know families have a head. Are you the head of yours?

mickey1975 wrote:I didn't know families have a head. Are you the head of yours?

So you are saying that nobody is head of the Fury family ? - and even that such a figurehead does not exist in either the traveller community or society in general ?

I'm not saying anything. You're the expert, an expertise no doubt gained watching Snatch, Knuckle and Big Joe Joyce videos on YouTube...

mickey1975 wrote:I'm not saying anything. You're the expert, an expertise no doubt gained watching Snatch, Knuckle and Big Joe Joyce videos on YouTube...

You appear to be talking to / about yourself mate.

bripez wrote:

mickey1975 wrote:I'm not saying anything. You're the expert, an expertise no doubt gained watching Snatch, Knuckle and Big Joe Joyce videos on YouTube...

You appear to be talking to / about yourself mate.

Ok, pal! I've no need to prove myself to you, or anyone else. I've met enough respected posters from this forum over the years who will confirm I'm no fanboy... Get back to your YouTube!

mickey1975 wrote:

bripez wrote:

mickey1975 wrote:I'm not saying anything. You're the expert, an expertise no doubt gained watching Snatch, Knuckle and Big Joe Joyce videos on YouTube...

You appear to be talking to / about yourself mate.

Ok, pal! I've no need to prove myself to you, or anyone else. I've met enough respected posters from this forum over the years who will confirm I'm no fanboy... Get back to your YouTube!

You appear to be confused Mickey and talking about yourself again.

As I said previously, neither I or you need to "prove" anything.

I have also read many times from posters on this site (not sure if they were in any way "respected" though) stating that you appear to have some kind of obsession with travellers.

Anyway, I have only been posting because I am in work at the moment and this has been slightly less tedious than what I should be doing. I am knocking off soon so won't carry on in my own time, however I am back in work tomorrow morning for more tedium !

I've been in work all day! And no, I wouldn't expect you to be able to tell the difference between the likes of yourself, Lefty and Horse and the guys who are bit more clued up...

Only 4 years for gauging another man's eye out. Shows everything that's wrong with this country, softly softly justice system. Should have done 10 years for that the sick fornicator.

I assume there was more to it than a pint though, probably more like gypsy family rivalries but who knows with these nutcases.

mickey1975 wrote:I've been in work all day! ...

Tarmacing a drive by any chance?