BoxRec

James Mc should be top 10.....groves too high

I personally think that Mitchell is better than the 5 fighters you've listed directly above him.

Bet you're glad to be back, Horse?

Saunders above Lee,your having a laugh.

Despite his heroic performances against Abraham, I don't think Paul Smith is the best fighter in his family.

I reckon Frampton is best in uk P4P. Buzzing for Saturday

nickcat0 wrote:Despite his heroic performances against Abraham, I don't think Paul Smith is the best fighter in his family.

Yeah Callum looks the business. Maybe Hearn could persuade AA to take on Callum later in the year providing he gets by Sturm which won't be easy. I don't know what the situation is with Mandatories concerning AA because Smith was a voluntary and I'm assuming Sturm is the same?

I would have Mitchell above Cleverly, his last two wins were better than anything Cleverly has done in a long time.

I also can't see how Macklin is above C Smith, both fought Euro level opponents last time and Smith barely lost a round
whereas Macklin looked awful

nickcat0 wrote:Despite his heroic performances against Abraham, I don't think Paul Smith is the best fighter in his family.

Despite my above quibble, I would like to stress how much I appreciate you posting this p4p ranking, and the effort you must put in ......... thanks Horse.

if murray steps up to 168, id happily take any action on groves beating him

Tastethepain wrote:if murray steps up to 168, id happily take any action on groves beating him

That's not how pound for pound lists work

Tastethepain wrote:if murray steps up to 168, id happily take any action on groves beating him

Froch 1 rounds 1-6 Groves, yes. Rebrasse or Douglin Groves, no.

G0mez wrote:Murray > George Groves.

Fought for 3 world titles now abroad, 2 cases for a win, 1 loss against the man of the moment.

What's Groves done, except get sparked in Brit soil and adorn undercards ?

Groves beat DeGale, Johnson, Rebrasse, Sierra & Smith. He also put Froch on his back and made a monkey out of him for half of their first fight.

hurlock wrote:Horse bellew is no better off to what he was at L.heavy. Now he ain't drained he's just too small

Maybe.

Ian1973 wrote:Not too bad Horse. I'd have Murray above Groves.

I'll think about that.

Switch hitter wrote:James Mc should be top 10.....groves too high

McDonnell's been fighting fairly poor opposition recently. He doesn't deserve to be in the top 10. He's too high if anything.

nickcat0 wrote:

nickcat0 wrote:Despite his heroic performances against Abraham, I don't think Paul Smith is the best fighter in his family.

Despite my above quibble, I would like to stress how much I appreciate you posting this p4p ranking, and the effort you must put in ......... thanks Horse.

Yes, me too - didn't realise how much you meant before I thought we'd lost you, sob

Horse wrote:

Switch hitter wrote:James Mc should be top 10.....groves too high

McDonnell's been fighting fairly poor opposition recently. He doesn't deserve to be in the top 10. He's too high if anything.

As apposed to Groves's last 2

danamba7 wrote:I personally think that Mitchell is better than the 5 fighters you've listed directly above him.

Mitchell needs to fight better opposition.

palooka wrote:Bet you're glad to be back, Horse?

http://youtu.be/EVESMxs4rbA?t=2s

dutchie wrote:Saunders above Lee,your having a laugh.

I don't rate Korobov highly.

nickcat0 wrote:Despite his heroic performances against Abraham, I don't think Paul Smith is the best fighter in his family.

He's the most proven.

Horse wrote:

G0mez wrote:Murray > George Groves.

Fought for 3 world titles now abroad, 2 cases for a win, 1 loss against the man of the moment.

What's Groves done, except get sparked in Brit soil and adorn undercards ?

Groves beat DeGale, Johnson, Rebrasse, Sierra & Smith. He also put Froch on his back and made a monkey out of him for half of their first fight.

Weak reply, but to be expected.

You cannot justify it.

Stuarty30 wrote:I reckon Frampton is best in uk P4P. Buzzing for Saturday

Ability-wise maybe, but he doesn't have the record to be No. 1 yet.

Stuarty30 wrote:Yeah Callum looks the business. Maybe Hearn could persuade AA to take on Callum later in the year providing he gets by Sturm which won't be easy. I don't know what the situation is with Mandatories concerning AA because Smith was a voluntary and I'm assuming Sturm is the same?

Callum Smith's not WBO ranked yet, I'd like to see it though.

keirw wrote:I would have Mitchell above Cleverly, his last two wins were better than anything Cleverly has done in a long time.

Cleverly is far more proven than Mitchell though. Cleverly was injured for the whole fight against Bellew, so losing that didn't mean much.

keirw wrote:I also can't see how Macklin is above C Smith, both fought Euro level opponents last time and Smith barely lost a round
whereas Macklin looked awful

Callum will probably move above Macklin after his next fight.