Page 2 of 2
Re: Fighters that turnt out a lot better then what you thoug
Posted: 25 Feb 2015, 09:40
by JC
I tend to underrate British fighters generally. Definitely Froch, Brook too based on the Porter performance.
Re: Fighters that turnt out a lot better then what you thoug
Posted: 25 Feb 2015, 10:29
by deadpan
Khan after Prescott. I presumed that was the end of him.
Akinwande
Honeyghan
Re: Fighters that turnt out a lot better then what you thoug
Posted: 25 Feb 2015, 11:44
by Stuarty
palooka wrote:Derry Matthews
Chris Saunders
Jon Jo Irwin
Paul Ingle
Richard Evatt (he'd been knocked cold a few times as an amateur)
Colin Dunne
Terry Flanagan (he's surprised me already)
Yeah Paul Ingle is a good shout. I was a massive Naz fan so disliked Paul at the time by default so never really appreciated what a good fighter he was. The naivety of youth lol.
Re: Fighters that turnt out a lot better then what you thoug
Posted: 25 Feb 2015, 12:48
by TheWigwam
First fight I saw of Crolla's was the first Derry Matthews fight, thought he looked terrible and just went forhead first asking to be hit, now looks a very decent fighter and seems like a nice chap. Best of luck to him

Re: Fighters that turnt out a lot better then what you thoug
Posted: 25 Feb 2015, 13:15
by Broomhall
palooka wrote:Derry Matthews
Chris Saunders
Jon Jo Irwin
Paul Ingle
Richard Evatt (he'd been knocked cold a few times as an amateur)
Colin Dunne
Terry Flanagan (he's surprised me already)
Surprised with some of the picks here Palooka- Irwin and Ingle were good amateurs, and Evatt won the ABA title-that guy could bang.
For me Josh Warrington is currently exceeding expectations, Clinton Woods, Dennis Andries, James Cook, Roy Gumbs all did a lot better than they looked earlier in their careers-Paul Silky Jones, Brian Anderson, Najib Daho maybe?
Re: Fighters that turnt out a lot better then what you thoug
Posted: 25 Feb 2015, 13:41
by palooka
Richie could certainly punch and he won the ABA's on a run of knockouts, I remember him as a junior from 89 and he lost maybe 4 bouts by stoppage or KO as a junior - I thought he was a powerful fighter but vulnerable - he proved me wrong as he was tough as hell.
I knew Jon Jo slightly and trained alongside him for a spell and though I admired him, his skills and dedication I didn't think he'd do as well has a pro without a really solid punch. Again, I was proved wrong and I was glad to be, Jon Jo was a credit to himself and our hometown.
I knew that Paul was a solid amateur, I'd seen him lose to Johnny Armour; I watched him win after fouling Neil Swain and Swain was hammering Ingle - again Paul proved me wrong, doing really well in a very tough division.
Re: Fighters that turnt out a lot better then what you thoug
Posted: 25 Feb 2015, 14:32
by Darcy Delaney
palooka wrote:Richie could certainly punch and he won the ABA's on a run of knockouts, I remember him as a junior from 89 and he lost maybe 4 bouts by stoppage or KO as a junior - I thought he was a powerful fighter but vulnerable - he proved me wrong as he was tough as hell.
I knew Jon Jo slightly and trained alongside him for a spell and though I admired him, his skills and dedication I didn't think he'd do as well has a pro without a really solid punch. Again, I was proved wrong and I was glad to be, Jon Jo was a credit to himself and our hometown.
I knew that Paul was a solid amateur, I'd seen him lose to Johnny Armour; I watched him win after fouling Neil Swain and Swain was hammering Ingle - again Paul proved me wrong, doing really well in a very tough division.
Ritchie fight with junior Jones is on youtube what a cracking fight it was
Re: Fighters that turnt out a lot better then what you thoug
Posted: 25 Feb 2015, 14:45
by palooka
Darcy Delaney wrote:palooka wrote:Richie could certainly punch and he won the ABA's on a run of knockouts, I remember him as a junior from 89 and he lost maybe 4 bouts by stoppage or KO as a junior - I thought he was a powerful fighter but vulnerable - he proved me wrong as he was tough as hell.
I knew Jon Jo slightly and trained alongside him for a spell and though I admired him, his skills and dedication I didn't think he'd do as well has a pro without a really solid punch. Again, I was proved wrong and I was glad to be, Jon Jo was a credit to himself and our hometown.
I knew that Paul was a solid amateur, I'd seen him lose to Johnny Armour; I watched him win after fouling Neil Swain and Swain was hammering Ingle - again Paul proved me wrong, doing really well in a very tough division.
Ritchie fight with junior Jones is on youtube what a cracking fight it was[/ote]
He was very fierce and dynamic, I know you were pals with Richie, Darcy and he had an aura about him - he was pretty fearless.
(On another note, I tried to get hold of some Shaun Gray footage but had no luck, if you see some of Shaun's family would you see if it's possible, please?)
Re: Fighters that turnt out a lot better then what you thoug
Posted: 25 Feb 2015, 15:51
by reggaereggae
deadpan wrote:Khan after Prescott. I presumed that was the end of him.
Akinwande
Honeyghan
Khan is a great shout. After getting floored by non punchers and ironed flat by Prescott I thought he would get chinned a few times then disappear.
He has bounced back and looked great (although vulnerable)
Re: Fighters that turnt out a lot better then what you thoug
Posted: 26 Feb 2015, 07:19
by danamba7
Couple of years ago I thought Price would KO Fury easily, now it's probably the other way round.
Also, at a lower level, Curtis Woodhouse has definitely exceeded expectations. Pretty impressive to get to a good level in 2 pro sports.
Re: Fighters that turnt out a lot better then what you thoug
Posted: 26 Feb 2015, 07:59
by SNG
Carl Froch.
I thought JT would do a number on him and he'd mill about just below the title holders maybe getting another shot or two.