Page 2 of 2

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 02 Mar 2015, 03:24
by Switch hitter
Horse wrote:
G0mez wrote:Martinez whom was beaten by Rendall Munroe in a Notts leisure centre ? and already KO'd by Frampton previously?

Porter had sparked Malignaggi a 2-weight champion and bullied former champion Devon Alexander. Martinez has not done much at all and was a paper champion, who was fortunate to get the title due to Frampton's change in promoters taking him out the loop for a short while.
Porter who drew Julio Diaz just over two years ago?

Martinez stopped Romero, Mathebula and Hasegawa in world title fights in a 9 month run. If Martinez was a paper champion then so was Porter.
But he already beat Martinez....surely going to the U.S and beating someone who nearly everyone thought was going to lose to is a far greater win than beating someone who you stopped before

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 02 Mar 2015, 03:27
by Switch hitter
Macklin should be out rather than either Smith or Galahad.....Still dont understand why James Mc is not in top 10 but Groves is

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 02 Mar 2015, 06:34
by danamba7
Ian1973 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:I still reckon Frampton is best p4p. He doesn't have the names on his record like Froch but on ability he is out in front.

It's about balancing achievement with proven ability, at least it should be although I do sometimes wonder when I look at Horse's P4P world list. I think if Frampton beats Santa Cruz it'd be hard to argue against him being British P4P number one.
Very hard to balance the 2. It's a lot easier to do 2 separate lists. In a list of achievements Froch would be number 1 by far. A list of pure ability, Frampton, Brook & Khan would be above him.

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 02 Mar 2015, 08:07
by Boxerbeetle
danamba7 wrote:
Ian1973 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:I still reckon Frampton is best p4p. He doesn't have the names on his record like Froch but on ability he is out in front.

It's about balancing achievement with proven ability, at least it should be although I do sometimes wonder when I look at Horse's P4P world list. I think if Frampton beats Santa Cruz it'd be hard to argue against him being British P4P number one.
Very hard to balance the 2. It's a lot easier to do 2 separate lists. In a list of achievements Froch would be number 1 by far. A list of pure ability, Frampton, Brook & Khan would be above him.
Whaaaat? Don't agree with that at all. Unless you're talking purely on a technical level, which counts for very little on its own.

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 02 Mar 2015, 08:11
by danamba7
Boxerbeetle wrote: Whaaaat? Don't agree with that at all. Unless you're talking purely on a technical level, which counts for very little on its own.
I was thinking mostly on a technical level so underrating the Cobra overall probably which is rare for me to do!

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 02 Mar 2015, 08:25
by rossij8
Horse wrote:
Ian1973 wrote:It's about balancing achievement with proven ability, at least it should be although I do sometimes wonder when I look at Horse's P4P world list. I think if Frampton beats Santa Cruz it'd be hard to argue against him being British P4P number one.
I don't think beating Santa Cruz would make Frampton the clear No. 1.
Not clear no 1, just shading no1 if he beats SC

Froch has been inactive (nearly a year)

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 02 Mar 2015, 08:49
by whiskey
Holy shit balls.

Beating Leo Santa Cruz puts Frampton no1 in the UK ?

:lol:

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 02 Mar 2015, 08:57
by Boxerbeetle
G0mez wrote:Holy poo balls.

Beating Leo Santa Cruz puts Frampton no1 in the UK ?

:lol:
Haven't you heard? Golovkin-Mania is out, Frampton-Mania is in.

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 11:49
by Horse
Champfan10 wrote:I expected that reply but the fact is a loss surely can't make anyone raise in the rankings, the only way that I would see that happen is it we was talking about Paul Smiths first fight against AA.
I disagree.

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 11:51
by Horse
crusader wrote:I think Smith was well-beaten by AA this time; in my view it's fitting to move a boxer up following a loss in certain cases, but I don't see why Smith should move up now.
I don't think Abraham won convincingly the second time either.

Even though Abraham's workrate was better in the rematch, it was still poor.

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 11:55
by Horse
Switch hitter wrote:But he already beat Martinez....surely going to the U.S and beating someone who nearly everyone thought was going to lose to is a far greater win than beating someone who you stopped before
Not necessarily.

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 11:55
by palooka
Abraham won convincingly, even Smith and his camp said as much.

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 11:56
by Horse
Switch hitter wrote:Macklin should be out rather than either Smith or Galahad.....Still dont understand why James Mc is not in top 10 but Groves is
Groves fights better opposition. McDonnell is a paper champion who fights low level opponents.

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 11:58
by Horse
rossij8 wrote:Not clear no 1, just shading no1 if he beats SC

Froch has been inactive (nearly a year)
It will all depend on how and when it happens.

Froch might have beaten Ward before then.

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 11:59
by Horse
palooka wrote:Abraham won convincingly, even Smith and his camp said as much.
I don't care what Smith or his camp say.

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 12:09
by palooka
Do you care or consider what anyone says?

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 12:13
by Horse
palooka wrote:Do you care or consider what anyone says?
Yes.

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 12:53
by danamba7
Horse wrote:
rossij8 wrote:Not clear no 1, just shading no1 if he beats SC

Froch has been inactive (nearly a year)
It will all depend on how and when it happens.

Froch will have beaten Ward before then.
:bag: :D

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 12:54
by forcefraser
Kevin Mitchell too low and Bellew too high. Swap them please.

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 12:59
by Horse
danamba7 wrote:
Horse wrote:Froch will have beaten Ward before then.
:bag: :D
Knock his head off Froch! :box:

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 13:00
by Horse
forcefraser wrote:Kevin Mitchell too low and Bellew too high. Swap them please.
Bellew deserves to be higher than Mitchell.

Mitchell needs to step up.

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 13:46
by Switch hitter
Horse wrote:
Switch hitter wrote:But he already beat Martinez....surely going to the U.S and beating someone who nearly everyone thought was going to lose to is a far greater win than beating someone who you stopped before
Not necessarily.[/quote
Of course it is that's the most ridiculous thing ive heard

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 03 Mar 2015, 13:49
by Horse
Switch hitter wrote:Of course it is that's the most ridiculous thing ive heard
Sure it is.

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 05 Mar 2015, 11:08
by Marlo Stanfield
Horse wrote:
Switch hitter wrote:Of course it is that's the most ridiculous thing ive heard
Sure it is.
What if a journeyman beats an average fighter? Does he go above Frampton because no one expected him to win? :lol:

Re: British Top 30 P4P March 2015

Posted: 05 Mar 2015, 11:51
by Horse
Marlo Stanfield wrote:What if a journeyman beats an average fighter? Does he go above Frampton because no one expected him to win? :lol:
They do according to some.