Re: Howard Foster
Posted: 01 Mar 2015, 12:03
It was an okay stoppage, big whoop.
No.palooka wrote:I thought Foster was perceptive and stepped in exactly at the right time, he gets flak when he does it wrong - it should be balanced.
I disagree, Foster had plenty of grief over the Groves stoppage and he did very well last night, as stoppages go it was neither a punch too soon or a punch too late.Horse wrote:No.palooka wrote:I thought Foster was perceptive and stepped in exactly at the right time, he gets flak when he does it wrong - it should be balanced.
We should expect competent stoppages from referees. Foster did nothing special last night whatsoever.
Foster's stoppage in the Groves fight was an utter disgrace and he deserved abuse.palooka wrote:I disagree, Foster had plenty of grief over the Groves stoppage and he did very well last night, as stoppages go it was neither a punch too soon or a punch too late.
exactly right i put on my FB the positioning was perfect you went from not noticing howard was there to having the fighter safely wrapped in his arms before one extra punch was thrown or neededtaffytoon wrote:And they do far too much; if you are quick enough to moan at least be quick enough to praise. Perfect stoppage.palooka wrote:Though if a ref does make a mistake fans ought to feel able to comment.
Why shouldn't we?seanilius wrote:We shouldn't have to praise refs for correct stoppages. It should be par for the course. It's about the fighters not the refs.
Agree.Horse wrote:No.palooka wrote:I thought Foster was perceptive and stepped in exactly at the right time, he gets flak when he does it wrong - it should be balanced.
We should expect competent stoppages from referees. Foster did nothing special last night whatsoever.
I was thinking the same thing but didn't want to sound a sadistforcefraser wrote:As a star referee you are expected to do the job correctly. personally i would not have minded seeing Avalaos take a few more, as he was a lairy, mouthy gobshite.