Page 2 of 2

Re: Howard Foster

Posted: 01 Mar 2015, 12:03
by Horse
It was an okay stoppage, big whoop.

Re: Howard Foster

Posted: 01 Mar 2015, 12:06
by Tuan_Jim
You know there's a problem in boxing when fans are applauding people for doing the thing they are supposed to do.

Re: Howard Foster

Posted: 01 Mar 2015, 12:18
by palooka
I thought Foster was perceptive and stepped in exactly at the right time, he gets flak when he does it wrong - it should be balanced.

Re: Howard Foster

Posted: 01 Mar 2015, 12:22
by Horse
palooka wrote:I thought Foster was perceptive and stepped in exactly at the right time, he gets flak when he does it wrong - it should be balanced.
No.

We should expect competent stoppages from referees. Foster did nothing special last night whatsoever.

Re: Howard Foster

Posted: 01 Mar 2015, 12:30
by palooka
Horse wrote:
palooka wrote:I thought Foster was perceptive and stepped in exactly at the right time, he gets flak when he does it wrong - it should be balanced.
No.

We should expect competent stoppages from referees. Foster did nothing special last night whatsoever.
I disagree, Foster had plenty of grief over the Groves stoppage and he did very well last night, as stoppages go it was neither a punch too soon or a punch too late.

Re: Howard Foster

Posted: 01 Mar 2015, 12:39
by Horse
palooka wrote:I disagree, Foster had plenty of grief over the Groves stoppage and he did very well last night, as stoppages go it was neither a punch too soon or a punch too late.
Foster's stoppage in the Groves fight was an utter disgrace and he deserved abuse.

He stopped this fight at the correct time, but most people could have done the same. It's not impressive at all, it was merely sensible.

Re: Howard Foster

Posted: 01 Mar 2015, 13:31
by Tangerine
Got to agree with Sean and horse here,it was a good stoppage that's all that needs to be said. This should be par for the course everytime. Sorry

Re: Howard Foster

Posted: 01 Mar 2015, 13:34
by Rexob
Impossible! Dont talk rubbish!

Re: Howard Foster

Posted: 01 Mar 2015, 15:55
by jonp
taffytoon wrote:
palooka wrote:Though if a ref does make a mistake fans ought to feel able to comment.
And they do far too much; if you are quick enough to moan at least be quick enough to praise. Perfect stoppage.
exactly right i put on my FB the positioning was perfect you went from not noticing howard was there to having the fighter safely wrapped in his arms before one extra punch was thrown or needed

Re: Howard Foster

Posted: 01 Mar 2015, 16:08
by DMA1987
seanilius wrote:We shouldn't have to praise refs for correct stoppages. It should be par for the course. It's about the fighters not the refs.
Why shouldn't we?

Re: Howard Foster

Posted: 01 Mar 2015, 19:08
by Bard of Boxrec
Horse wrote:
palooka wrote:I thought Foster was perceptive and stepped in exactly at the right time, he gets flak when he does it wrong - it should be balanced.
No.

We should expect competent stoppages from referees. Foster did nothing special last night whatsoever.
Agree.

The praise is disproportionate because it's only in relation to how badly he has screwed up before.

Re: Howard Foster

Posted: 02 Mar 2015, 03:12
by forcefraser
As a star referee you are expected to do the job correctly. personally i would not have minded seeing Avalaos take a few more, as he was a lairy, mouthy gobshite.

Re: Howard Foster

Posted: 02 Mar 2015, 06:34
by Stuarty
forcefraser wrote:As a star referee you are expected to do the job correctly. personally i would not have minded seeing Avalaos take a few more, as he was a lairy, mouthy gobshite.
I was thinking the same thing but didn't want to sound a sadist :lol:

Re: Howard Foster

Posted: 02 Mar 2015, 09:01
by Sweet P
Howard is a World class referee. He is also genuinely good bloke.
And a great bloke to have a few pints with.