Andrade - Lara smack talk heats up

ReggieDiggs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3126
Joined: 05 Jun 2010, 10:37

Re: Andrade - Lara smack talk heats up

Post by ReggieDiggs »

birdman77 wrote:Lara cannot lose another fight or he is done for as a major titlist
Cmon man lmmfao. There is no L limit before you are "done as a major titlist". Granted I'm not even sure what you mean by "major titlist" as the whole concept of champion is diluted among various levels.

And I mean the guy gots 2 L's ffs. And both have some level of controversy on them.

The Paul Williams L was straight bs & the fact all the judges got (indefinitely, iirc) suspended for that one makes that undisputable & something that probably shoulda been overturned if boxing ever actually overturned bad decisions. And the L to Saul was highly disputed by a good portion of fans. And even if you think the decision was 100% legit, 1 round scored for Erislandy by 1 judge woulda made that a draw. Thats how close that fight was. I hardly think Erislandy getting his first undisputed L (assuming it would be) or even his third L if you entirely disagree with me to another legit top tier guy ends any potential future reign he could have in the division.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Andrade - Lara smack talk heats up

Post by crusader »

Lara's only lost one fight on my card and it was to Molina rather than Canelo or Williams, the latter of whom benefited from one of the worst decisions I've seen.
Post Reply