Re: Thurman vs Guerrero
Posted: 07 Mar 2015, 23:42
Guerrero needs to get a new father. The one he has now is willing to get him killed.
That is a dumb part of fans. Keith has nothing to be ashamed of after this fight. He had to "run" even more. Most of opponents would quit after taking so much punishment as Guerrero took.Boxing Prospect wrote:I understand Thurman is winning, easily, but he needs to realise fans won't out up with the running The boos will follow him, and this is second fight where he's had to hear them...
If Keith wants to talk the talk, claim he's "One Time" and "KO's 4 Life" then he's going to be judged by his mouth. When he fights negatively he'll be judged by the fans based on that negativity. Can you imagine...Kovalev running from a smaller opponent just because his opponent can take punishment? Can you imagine Golovkin running? Gonzalez? Inoue?ikorolev wrote:That is a dumb part of fans. Keith has nothing to be ashamed of after this fight. He had to "run" even more. Most of opponents would quit after taking so much punishment as Guerrero took.Boxing Prospect wrote:I understand Thurman is winning, easily, but he needs to realise fans won't out up with the running The boos will follow him, and this is second fight where he's had to hear them...
Boxing Prospect wrote:If Keith wants to talk the talk, claim he's "One Time" and "KO's 4 Life" then he's going to be judged by his mouth. When he fights negatively he'll be judged by the fans based on that negativity. Can you imagine...Kovalev running from a smaller opponent just because his opponent can take punishment? Can you imagine Golovkin running? Gonzalez? Inoue?ikorolev wrote:That is a dumb part of fans. Keith has nothing to be ashamed of after this fight. He had to "run" even more. Most of opponents would quit after taking so much punishment as Guerrero took.Boxing Prospect wrote:I understand Thurman is winning, easily, but he needs to realise fans won't out up with the running The boos will follow him, and this is second fight where he's had to hear them...
He put a beating on a guy who's naturally smaller, slower and lacks power, a guy he was hugely favoured to beat and a guy who's never stopped anyone above 135lbs (and even the stoppages there were against limited foes).hurricanemitch14 wrote: Keith put a beating on Guerrero......its rd 11, obvious that Guerrero isn't going anywhere and his only chance is to make it a brawl. So why would he stand toe to toe and brawl. Thurman has always been a mover who pot shots. Kovalev and GGG r more seek and destroy type fighter anyways.
That's not quite fair.Boxing Prospect wrote: He put a beating on a guy who's naturally smaller, slower and lacks power, a guy he was hugely favoured to beat and a guy who's never stopped anyone above 135lbs (and even the stoppages there were against limited foes).
There is a HUGE gulf between standing toe-to-toe and running. Round 11 was running. The pot shotting is fine, but if he's wanting to get a big money pay day with Mayweather or Pacquiao he needs to make a statement. Saying "These guys ith ducking me, these guyth is scared of me, I ith one time, I hit them one time and thath it" isn't going to get him the multi-million pound pay days. He needs to do more than just win to get those pay days.
Use Inoue's destruction of Narvaez if you rather, that was a statement win done by a boxer against a tough opponent. That made the world site up and take note. That turned a guy into a sensation.
Thurman's good, don't get me wrong, just no where near as good as his mouth is telling us he is, no where what his fans are suggesting, and he's no where the puncher his wants us to believe he is.
Honestly, I think even Floyd and Pac would have their hands full with Thurman.hurricanemitch14 wrote:He is just trying to hype the fight.....is this seriously the first time you've seen a fighter do that. Guerrero has been a rough guy at 147 even if he is "smaller" and I haven't seen anyone pushing him around the ring either. That was a good fight, ur nuts to say other wise.
Who at 147 outside Pacman and Floyd is gonna handle Thurman??? Bradley.....Kell....Porter....nah I think he'll do just fine.
i would like to see thurman fight brook. i would especially like it if thurman tookEvander wrote:Thurman will move onto bigger and better things
Thurman did punish Guerrero, can't argue there, much more than Mayweather did. Again no argument there. Thurman however had 10lbs of weight on Guerrero, was naturally faster and naturally stronger. Mayweather isn't talking about being a concussive puncher of "KO's 4 Life", he's not talking about the division avoiding him, he's not looking to make a statement win (at the same point in his career he was dismantling Corrales and schooling Hernandez).Impractical Poster wrote:That's not quite fair.Boxing Prospect wrote: He put a beating on a guy who's naturally smaller, slower and lacks power, a guy he was hugely favoured to beat and a guy who's never stopped anyone above 135lbs (and even the stoppages there were against limited foes).
There is a HUGE gulf between standing toe-to-toe and running. Round 11 was running. The pot shotting is fine, but if he's wanting to get a big money pay day with Mayweather or Pacquiao he needs to make a statement. Saying "These guys ith ducking me, these guyth is scared of me, I ith one time, I hit them one time and thath it" isn't going to get him the multi-million pound pay days. He needs to do more than just win to get those pay days.
Use Inoue's destruction of Narvaez if you rather, that was a statement win done by a boxer against a tough opponent. That made the world site up and take note. That turned a guy into a sensation.
Thurman's good, don't get me wrong, just no where near as good as his mouth is telling us he is, no where what his fans are suggesting, and he's no where the puncher his wants us to believe he is.
Guerrero was a big guy for the lower classes. He looked a bit taller than Thurman in the ring, and he had the reach advantage. Thurman punished Robert more than Mayweather did, and also did what Mayweather couldn't in knocking him down. (Something no one has ever done to Robert professionally.) If you thought Thurman ran at any time in this fight, you must have thought Mayweather was running a marathon
No it's not, and I hate EVERYTIME they hype and don't deliver. I'm disgusted by the idea of Coyle Vs Campbell for the same reason, Haye Vs Audley (much of Haye's career for that matter).hurricanemitch14 wrote:He is just trying to hype the fight.....is this seriously the first time you've seen a fighter do that. Guerrero has been a rough guy at 147 even if he is "smaller" and I haven't seen anyone pushing him around the ring either. That was a good fight, ur nuts to say other wise.
Who at 147 outside Pacman and Floyd is gonna handle Thurman??? Bradley.....Kell....Porter....nah I think he'll do just fine.
Boxing Prospect wrote:Thurman did punish Guerrero, can't argue there, much more than Mayweather did. Again no argument there. Thurman however had 10lbs of weight on Guerrero, was naturally faster and naturally stronger. Mayweather isn't talking about being a concussive puncher of "KO's 4 Life", he's not talking about the division avoiding him, he's not looking to make a statement win (at the same point in his career he was dismantling Corrales and schooling Hernandez).Impractical Poster wrote:That's not quite fair.Boxing Prospect wrote: He put a beating on a guy who's naturally smaller, slower and lacks power, a guy he was hugely favoured to beat and a guy who's never stopped anyone above 135lbs (and even the stoppages there were against limited foes).
There is a HUGE gulf between standing toe-to-toe and running. Round 11 was running. The pot shotting is fine, but if he's wanting to get a big money pay day with Mayweather or Pacquiao he needs to make a statement. Saying "These guys ith ducking me, these guyth is scared of me, I ith one time, I hit them one time and thath it" isn't going to get him the multi-million pound pay days. He needs to do more than just win to get those pay days.
Use Inoue's destruction of Narvaez if you rather, that was a statement win done by a boxer against a tough opponent. That made the world site up and take note. That turned a guy into a sensation.
Thurman's good, don't get me wrong, just no where near as good as his mouth is telling us he is, no where what his fans are suggesting, and he's no where the puncher his wants us to believe he is.
Guerrero was a big guy for the lower classes. He looked a bit taller than Thurman in the ring, and he had the reach advantage. Thurman punished Robert more than Mayweather did, and also did what Mayweather couldn't in knocking him down. (Something no one has ever done to Robert professionally.) If you thought Thurman ran at any time in this fight, you must have thought Mayweather was running a marathon
If you want to say the division is avoiding you, YOU need to do something special.
No it's not, and I hate EVERYTIME they hype and don't deliver. I'm disgusted by the idea of Coyle Vs Campbell for the same reason, Haye Vs Audley (much of Haye's career for that matter).hurricanemitch14 wrote:He is just trying to hype the fight.....is this seriously the first time you've seen a fighter do that. Guerrero has been a rough guy at 147 even if he is "smaller" and I haven't seen anyone pushing him around the ring either. That was a good fight, ur nuts to say other wise.
Who at 147 outside Pacman and Floyd is gonna handle Thurman??? Bradley.....Kell....Porter....nah I think he'll do just fine.
Hard to say but lets not pretend Bradley, Kell, Porter, Khan, aren't capable of giving him a fight.
His fans want to say he's going to be the star of American boxing yet in his most notable tests he's not looked like a star. He's looked like a GOOD fighter, not a STAR.