Re: Broner gets Maidana'd AGAIN..=)
Posted: 20 Jun 2015, 22:48
Crazy start to the 12th. Why I love boxing!
It was a beautiful shot, but Porter seemed to recover instantly. Good chin on him.dempseyfire wrote:Porter down at the beginning of the 12th from a perfectly timed counter hook right on the button but he recovered well. Porter 10-2. If Broner gets this it will be highway robbery . . .
Especially given that he was forced to drain down to 144.punchoutsb wrote:It was a beautiful shot, but Porter seemed to recover instantly. Good chin on him.dempseyfire wrote:Porter down at the beginning of the 12th from a perfectly timed counter hook right on the button but he recovered well. Porter 10-2. If Broner gets this it will be highway robbery . . .
His conditioning was also superb, even more impressive with the extra weight cut.dempseyfire wrote:Especially given that he was forced to drain down to 144.punchoutsb wrote:It was a beautiful shot, but Porter seemed to recover instantly. Good chin on him.dempseyfire wrote:Porter down at the beginning of the 12th from a perfectly timed counter hook right on the button but he recovered well. Porter 10-2. If Broner gets this it will be highway robbery . . .
brilo33 wrote:ud porter won. wow that last round was good, porter down great shot from broner
Floyd played the d-bag but at least one could appreciate his boxing skills, which are legitimately great. Broner talks sh^& and can't back it up; he's incredibly unentertaining. I find it remarkable a fighter fighting in the 140s manages to hold as much or more than Klitschko does, along with his numerous forearms, arm twists, and push-downs. The whole fight. And all Broner showed was the quick left hook counter and good reflexes. He couldn't land the right; his footwork was poor per usual, he showed zero angles. He's a one-trick pony.digzee wrote:I bet Broner took all those millions offered by Jay-Z, he's not gonna be a PPV star.
Yeah he's criminally overrated, his biggest asset was his size but now he's fighting guys his own size everyone can see he's not a P4P star.dempseyfire wrote:Floyd played the d-bag but at least one could appreciate his boxing skills, which are legitimately great. Broner talks sh^& and can't back it up; he's incredibly unentertaining. I find it remarkable a fighter fighting in the 140s manages to hold as much or more than Klitschko does, along with his numerous forearms, arm twists, and push-downs. The whole fight. And all Broner showed was the quick left hook counter and good reflexes. He couldn't land the right; his footwork was poor per usual, he showed zero angles. He's a one-trick pony.digzee wrote:I bet Broner took all those millions offered by Jay-Z, he's not gonna be a PPV star.
Would love him to drop down to 140, fight Crawford and get absolutely schooled.victor-romeo wrote:Broners only hope is to get down to 140 can not compete well at 147.
Broner may have better physical skills, but he is not more skilled than Porter. Porter had a game plan and executed it quite well, while Broner once again tried to rely on not much more than his physical gifts without putting the work into honing his boxing skills enough to give him a chance to beat his opponent.NateJR wrote:Broner is way more skilled than Porter and really shouldn't have lost. The problem with Broner is he doesn't know when to turn it on and off and doesn't make adjustments. On the other hand, Madaina beat the living poo outta Broner, where as Porter just out worked and out pressured Broner with out ever having him in serious trouble. Madiana did a much better number on him than Porter did to the point I don't think Broner would ever have a chance against Madaina, but I wouldn't doubt Broner could beat Porter in a rematch.
He's way more skilled, but not as tactical. But I guess in a sense being a tactician is a overlooked skill and Broner just doesn't have that. But Broner learns to control the center of the ring with his jab he beats Porter. Broner was too predictable with his left hook counters, he allowed Porter to get inside on him because he wasn't throwing a jab, it's really that simple. To be honest Porter has a terrible jab and Broner had all the advantages in the middle of the ring and didn't use it.The Great John L wrote:Broner may have better physical skills, but he is not more skilled than Porter. Porter had a game plan and executed it quite well, while Broner once again tried to rely on not much more than his physical gifts without putting the work into honing his boxing skills enough to give him a chance to beat his opponent.NateJR wrote:Broner is way more skilled than Porter and really shouldn't have lost. The problem with Broner is he doesn't know when to turn it on and off and doesn't make adjustments. On the other hand, Madaina beat the living poo outta Broner, where as Porter just out worked and out pressured Broner with out ever having him in serious trouble. Madiana did a much better number on him than Porter did to the point I don't think Broner would ever have a chance against Madaina, but I wouldn't doubt Broner could beat Porter in a rematch.
Knowing what to do in the ring is exactly what is meant by boxing skills. Porter has way more boxing skill than Broner, while Broner is more physically gifted and to this point doesn't seem particlaulry interested in learning anymore boxing skills.NateJR wrote:He's way more skilled, but not as tactical. But I guess in a sense being a tactician is a overlooked skill and Broner just doesn't have that. But Broner learns to control the center of the ring with his jab he beats Porter. Broner was too predictable with his left hook counters, he allowed Porter to get inside on him because he wasn't throwing a jab, it's really that simple. To be honest Porter has a terrible jab and Broner had all the advantages in the middle of the ring and didn't use it.The Great John L wrote:Broner may have better physical skills, but he is not more skilled than Porter. Porter had a game plan and executed it quite well, while Broner once again tried to rely on not much more than his physical gifts without putting the work into honing his boxing skills enough to give him a chance to beat his opponent.NateJR wrote:Broner is way more skilled than Porter and really shouldn't have lost. The problem with Broner is he doesn't know when to turn it on and off and doesn't make adjustments. On the other hand, Madaina beat the living poo outta Broner, where as Porter just out worked and out pressured Broner with out ever having him in serious trouble. Madiana did a much better number on him than Porter did to the point I don't think Broner would ever have a chance against Madaina, but I wouldn't doubt Broner could beat Porter in a rematch.