Page 2 of 2
Posted: 27 Jun 2004, 09:29
by ed rob
Thanks guys, I look on the site at least a couple of times a day and have done for months. Not spying! Just great to hear all your news and views.
Posted: 27 Jun 2004, 09:54
by E
You're dead out of order.
And as for your patronising comment 'at least you has a go'....did you have a go????
How many pro fights did you have???
Posted: 27 Jun 2004, 13:11
by MightyWarrior
ed rob wrote:Sorry if the interview came across as pushy. We don't just put someone on the spot and force them into speaking. I asked Oliver before the end of the previous round if he'd have a word and he said fine. Then, when the comms. threw to me, I asked my question and Oliver ignored me, I had to ask the question again. But agreed, it did seem intrusive.
Also I did have a couple of pro fights but never claimed to be any good. I more than knew my own limitations but I love the sport and just wanted to say I'd given it a go.
Fair enough Ed, it did occur to me after I'd posted that the Sky bosses must've asked for an in-between rounds interview - only doing your job so can't blame you for that. No offence intended mate.
You're one of the better interviewers as it happens, better than Adam that's for sure.
Posted: 27 Jun 2004, 13:21
by bennie
E wrote:
You're dead out of order.
And as for your patronising comment 'at least you has a go'....did you have a go????
How many pro fights did you have???
16-4 (6) as an amateur. Calm down, lad.
Posted: 27 Jun 2004, 13:28
by E
bennie wrote:E wrote:
You're dead out of order.
And as for your patronising comment 'at least you has a go'....did you have a go????
How many pro fights did you have???
16-4 (6) as an amateur. Calm down, lad.
So the answer to my question is in fact "You're right, I had no pro fights. So I have no right to make patronising comments about other pro's when I didn't have the guts to have a go."
Thanks for clearing that up.
Posted: 27 Jun 2004, 13:29
by bennie
E wrote:bennie wrote:E wrote:
You're dead out of order.
And as for your patronising comment 'at least you has a go'....did you have a go????
How many pro fights did you have???
16-4 (6) as an amateur. Calm down, lad.
So the answer to my question is in fact "You're right, I had no pro fights. So I have no right to make patronising comments about other pro's when I didn't have the guts to have a go."
Thanks for clearing that up.
No problem. Like I say, calm down, lad.
Posted: 27 Jun 2004, 13:30
by REAL_DEAL
Posted: 27 Jun 2004, 15:25
by buzz
bennie wrote:E wrote:bennie wrote:
16-4 (6) as an amateur. Calm down, lad.
So the answer to my question is in fact "You're right, I had no pro fights. So I have no right to make patronising comments about other pro's when I didn't have the guts to have a go."
quote]
Bollox, it doesnt matter if he has had a pro or amateur fight, they are both a fight in the ring and deserve as much respect as each other.
The amateur fighter is more applaudable as they do not fight for money.
Posted: 28 Jun 2004, 05:23
by knockout
jamie wasnt chinny, just had no balance cause of the injury!!!
And as for people criticising him for taking a risk if he wasnt 100%, first of all he hasnt fought for ages and has to earn a living and second of all there is always the probabilty that the hip would be fine and he would fight well.....
I feel sorry for Moore and his team and although i think they should have pulled Jamie out after the hip went I think they cannot be criticised if he had an injury in training that re-occured in the fight!!!
anyway i wish him a speedy recovery
Ed is always polite to fighters and trainers a like and although it isnt normal to ask the corner questions during a round I think he did it ok....
