BoxRec

2 minute rounds should be scrapped,there rare but I've seen a few at the shows up here

reggaereggae wrote:
You can still work inside if holding is outlawed. There is no real need for holding in boxing, it's spoiling.

Boxing without holding would be more entertaining, casual fans always remark "I wish they would stop hugging". There's no skill in it and it ruins the flow.

It also seems to me that if the house fighter wants to work inside then it's allowed. If the house boxer wants to peck from distance and "tie" his man up on the inside then it is allowed.

It also winds me up that when some guys hug they are spoiling...when other guys "tie" the up on the inside it's considered to be good boxing.

It ruins the sport.

Allow biting and pulling hair !

Seriously...
I can handle the OCCASIONAL 'interim' champ, I don't even mind 4 belts - as long as the have some sort of unification schedule - BUT Super and "Regular" champ is just the biggest pile of @#$% !
How THE **** is Scott Quigg "regular" champ !?
No disrespect to him, but Rigondeaux is the WBA champ - you can't have a belt for being good and in the top 10.
I HAATE any 'regular' champ.

skanksta wrote:Seriously...
I can handle the OCCASIONAL 'interim' champ, I don't even mind 4 belts - as long as the have some sort of unification schedule - BUT Super and "Regular" champ is just the biggest pile of @#$% !
How THE **** is Scott Quigg "regular" champ !?
No disrespect to him, but Rigondeaux is the WBA champ - you can't have a belt for being good and in the top 10.
I HAATE any 'regular' champ.

Surely you should hate the WBA not the fighter.

danamba7 wrote:

skanksta wrote:Seriously...
I can handle the OCCASIONAL 'interim' champ, I don't even mind 4 belts - as long as the have some sort of unification schedule - BUT Super and "Regular" champ is just the biggest pile of @#$% !
How THE **** is Scott Quigg "regular" champ !?
No disrespect to him, but Rigondeaux is the WBA champ - you can't have a belt for being good and in the top 10.
I HAATE any 'regular' champ.

Surely you should hate the WBA not the fighter.

You're exactly right - I HATE the WBA and the "Regular" belt - nothing against the boxers.

Not a rule but get rid if massive shorts and belly pads taking up half the boxer's body.

All ring card girls should be naked.

azzman wrote:Not a rule but get rid if massive shorts and belly pads taking up half the boxer's body.

I think that there should definitely be a rule - and checked out before the fight, that Eg the belly button must be visible or something. Some of these guys have the protector so high that it makes body punching virtually obsolete

reggaereggae wrote:

azzman wrote:Not a rule but get rid if massive shorts and belly pads taking up half the boxer's body.

I think that there should definitely be a rule - and checked out before the fight, that Eg the belly button must be visible or something. Some of these guys have the protector so high that it makes body punching virtually obsolete

Yeah, I remember Eubank, his shorts were almost under his chin he wore them so high.

Ezzard wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:
You can still work inside if holding is outlawed. There is no real need for holding in boxing, it's spoiling.

Boxing without holding would be more entertaining, casual fans always remark "I wish they would stop hugging". There's no skill in it and it ruins the flow.

It also seems to me that if the house fighter wants to work inside then it's allowed. If the house boxer wants to peck from distance and "tie" his man up on the inside then it is allowed.

It also winds me up that when some guys hug they are spoiling...when other guys "tie" the up on the inside it's considered to be good boxing.

It ruins the sport.

I disagree, it's an art when done properly, but unfortunately, far too much flagrant tieing the opponent up and not working in the clinches is done.

Referees need to be far more strict - that's the only way it will change.