Re: Deontay Wilder vs. Andrzej Wawrzyk
Posted: 22 Jul 2015, 21:46
Wilder must not be searching in the top 40 for opponents. He's really shaping-up to have the consistently softest title defenses of any active titlist.
In order to get to that level, he needs more than one in a row. Wlad, for example fought Derrick Jefferson and Charles Shufford after winning the WBO title from Chris Byrd. Wlad of course has a resume of a lot of top guys too, but just saying it is a little early to chastise him for it with only one title defense so far. All of the champs take easy fights from time to time. The ones that are more active take more than their share.Lackeos wrote:Wilder must not be searching in the top 40 for opponents. He's really shaping-up to have the consistently softest title defenses of any active titlist.
funso banjo baby wrote:Wilder and Stiverne were steered into extremely lucky title positions.
neither was remotely justified.
Povetkin holds the ridiculous silver title but is in a completely different league to those two.
punchoutsb wrote:That's an easy one: he's not as good as any of them.SenorPipino wrote:How is fighting the Pole any different than defending the heavyweight title against a Pulev, Wach or Pianetta? Not to mention a Leapai.
And while Wilder may be young, but if he plans to clean out the division he'd better start fighting decent competition. At this pace he'll be fighting his second top 20 opponent when he's in his 60's
zorndeslammes wrote:Wilder right now seems to be on the Povetkin plan of fighting substandard opposition in optional defenses and looking bad doing it. Maybe in 5 years, he can lose every round to the legitimate world champion and subsequently rebuild his credibility beating up damaged goods on ESPN 8: The Ocho.
I disagree with that other than Wlad. Every heavyweight resume can be disected. I think Stiverne was a world class fighter.funso banjo baby wrote:deontay hasnt been in a fight with a world class fighter yet.
regardless of the rankings that the alphabets gave stiverne and arreola.
not saying the fighters are to blame.
its just the sorry state that heavyweights are in.
it dosnt help that the hype around these guys is circus-like
in the run up to the Wilder-stiverne fight i had to continually remind some pretty influential journalists and insiders that stiverne was NOT undefeated as they were constantly claiming..but that he had a ko loss and a draw against extremely mediocre club fighters.
world ranked wrote:I disagree with that other than Wlad. Every heavyweight resume can be disected. I think Stiverne was a world class fighter.funso banjo baby wrote:deontay hasnt been in a fight with a world class fighter yet.
regardless of the rankings that the alphabets gave stiverne and arreola.
not saying the fighters are to blame.
its just the sorry state that heavyweights are in.
it dosnt help that the hype around these guys is circus-like
in the run up to the Wilder-stiverne fight i had to continually remind some pretty influential journalists and insiders that stiverne was NOT undefeated as they were constantly claiming..but that he had a ko loss and a draw against extremely mediocre club fighters.
Wach and Pulev are world class fighters. Pianetta is better than his Chagaev showing but is Euro level at best.SenorPipino wrote:
So do I. The frightening thing is that there are posters here who actually believe guys like Wach, Pianetta and Pulev are also world class fighters and somehow better than Wilder. Those 3 would have been life-and-death with Wepner.
I think I said once before that it's been so long since there's been a decent heavyweight around, many of you can't even recognize one.
..considering that fact that the best HWs are coming from EUROPE, that's the best compliment I can think of ...punchoutsb wrote:Wach and Pulev are world class fighters. Pianetta is better than his Chagaev showing but is Euro level at best.SenorPipino wrote:
So do I. The frightening thing is that there are posters here who actually believe guys like Wach, Pianetta and Pulev are also world class fighters and somehow better than Wilder. Those 3 would have been life-and-death with Wepner.
I think I said once before that it's been so long since there's been a decent heavyweight around, many of you can't even recognize one.
Nostalgia and hate got you by the balls man.
Wach has a world-class chin, and has decent skills and power. But he's really too slow to be rated as a world-class fighter.jujigatame wrote:I think Wach is pretty damn far from world-class.
Pulev may have gotten embarrassed by Wlad but he's still a class above Wach or Pianeta. Hell, make that 2 classes.
Yes, that is indeed a fact. And the ones who cannot get past the ceiling in EUROPE are still below WORLD classgreg wrote:..considering that fact that the best HWs are coming from EUROPE, that's the best compliment I can think of ...punchoutsb wrote:Wach and Pulev are world class fighters. Pianetta is better than his Chagaev showing but is Euro level at best.SenorPipino wrote:
So do I. The frightening thing is that there are posters here who actually believe guys like Wach, Pianetta and Pulev are also world class fighters and somehow better than Wilder. Those 3 would have been life-and-death with Wepner.
I think I said once before that it's been so long since there's been a decent heavyweight around, many of you can't even recognize one.
Nostalgia and hate got you by the balls man.
are you kidding? pianeta might be true, maybe even wach (although he would probably wilders toughest Opponent) but pulev is easily two Levels above the pole, wawryk won't even last a round against pulev.SenorPipino wrote:The heavyweight division is overloaded with crappy fighter.
How is fighting the Pole any different than defending the heavyweight title against a Pulev, Wach or Pianetta? Not to mention a Leapai.
Wilder is still young. Give him time and he'll clean out this dismal division.
There are decent heavyweights. Not great guys but better guys than Wawrzyk. I want the Povetkin fight.SenorPipino wrote:world ranked wrote:I disagree with that other than Wlad. Every heavyweight resume can be disected. I think Stiverne was a world class fighter.funso banjo baby wrote:deontay hasnt been in a fight with a world class fighter yet.
regardless of the rankings that the alphabets gave stiverne and arreola.
not saying the fighters are to blame.
its just the sorry state that heavyweights are in.
it dosnt help that the hype around these guys is circus-like
in the run up to the Wilder-stiverne fight i had to continually remind some pretty influential journalists and insiders that stiverne was NOT undefeated as they were constantly claiming..but that he had a ko loss and a draw against extremely mediocre club fighters.
So do I. The frightening thing is that there are posters here who actually believe guys like Wach, Pianetta and Pulev are also world class fighters and somehow better than Wilder. Those 3 would have been life-and-death with Wepner.
I think I said once before that it's been so long since there's been a decent heavyweight around, many of you can't even recognize one.
For the whole picture you'd need to look at total resumes. It's not like Wilder just started coasting now...he's coasted his whole career so far. It sucks when you follow a boxer for 30+ fights and still don't know if he's even legitimately world level.keithmoonhangover wrote:Wilder's just doing what most heavyweights have done. Win the title and get a couple of easy defences in before he has the gut check mandatory.
See Bowe, Foreman, Frazier and stacks of others.
So he fought bums? Loads of heavyweights did. He'll be fighting Povetkin or Wlad soon enough,punchoutsb wrote:For the whole picture you'd need to look at total resumes. It's not like Wilder just started coasting now...he's coasted his whole career so far. It sucks when you follow a boxer for 30+ fights and still don't know if he's even legitimately world level.keithmoonhangover wrote:Wilder's just doing what most heavyweights have done. Win the title and get a couple of easy defences in before he has the gut check mandatory.
See Bowe, Foreman, Frazier and stacks of others.