Re: Manny Healed!!!!
Posted: 12 Aug 2015, 22:50
The injury and surgery should be easy to prove.
Just show the scars.
Just show the scars.
I look forward to seeing the scar too. Was it a simple arthoscopic outpatient or major? You would think it's out there somewhere due to the injury being rather fishy.zojo, wrote:The injury and surgery should be easy to prove.
Just show the scars.
So because you can't be healed by the ocean (now), I should feel stupid that billions of dollars are being wasted on unnecessary surgeries, testing and medication?digzee wrote:I'm gonna get pushed into the Atlantic ocean tomorrow in my wheelchair, i'm sure my spinal injury will be instantly healed and I'll be walking again...BAD INTENTIONS wrote:I don't think this is BS.
Modern medicine sucks.
Come to find out that a bunch of sports surgeries are 100% unnecessary.
Ocean water > Surgery
Kind of like how you're lying about not having a bunch of fake accounts?KBB wrote:Ricky_ wrote:Brut do you spin a wheel or roll a dice to decide which acc to log into each morning?
Wtf are you talking about idiot?
How many times i have told you about this, seriously you need help.
Manny is a liar and a fake
Given the gibberish that you are spouting, I can only presume you were educated in the U.S.BAD INTENTIONS wrote:So because you can't be healed by the ocean (now), I should feel stupid that billions of dollars are being wasted on unnecessary surgeries, testing and medication?digzee wrote:I'm gonna get pushed into the Atlantic ocean tomorrow in my wheelchair, i'm sure my spinal injury will be instantly healed and I'll be walking again...BAD INTENTIONS wrote:I don't think this is BS.
Modern medicine sucks.
Come to find out that a bunch of sports surgeries are 100% unnecessary.
Ocean water > Surgery
Whatever, every American knows our education system sucks ...
yet almost every American walks around with 100% confidence in a medical system ranked lower than education.
Too much TV ...
If indeed it ever occurred.Like a Boss wrote:It's a miracle!
On a serious note it is 9 or 10 weeks since he fought and if it was only a slight tear it could have healed by now.
I see no reason to doubt his word.jamesmcdonnell wrote:If indeed it ever occurred.Like a Boss wrote:It's a miracle!
On a serious note it is 9 or 10 weeks since he fought and if it was only a slight tear it could have healed by now.
I can see millions of reasons.Like a Boss wrote:I see no reason to doubt his word.jamesmcdonnell wrote:If indeed it ever occurred.Like a Boss wrote:It's a miracle!
On a serious note it is 9 or 10 weeks since he fought and if it was only a slight tear it could have healed by now.
I'm so happy for you 8)jamesmcdonnell wrote:I can see millions of reasons.Like a Boss wrote:I see no reason to doubt his word.jamesmcdonnell wrote: If indeed it ever occurred.
I'm not sure any version of Manny would beat Mayweather after seeing that fight. As much as I wanted Manny to win, Floyd's defense is just too good.sucracristo wrote:2 of the scorecards each had him winning 4 rounds. with any improvement itImpractical Poster wrote:With Manny's new improved shoulder, he should be able to win at least 4 rounds against Floyd.
Possibly...
would be a draw. there were rounds which pac won clearly. the fight went the
way everyone expected, with floyd moving and pot shotting a lot. roach told
pac to be more aggressive between rounds but pac didn't follow instructions.
would pac have won more rounds if he was more aggressive? hard to say but
after so much hype over so long and such a huge payday, pac has no excuses.
there are guys who won fights with dislocated shoulders.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YT6kSm2hua4
i'm not saying pac could have won the fight under any circumstances, but
he was a big disappointment to say the least as far as his effort level in the
biggest fight of his career. he should have left it all out there and he didn't.
if there is a rematch, he should do it for free. otherwise, just move on and
accept that he lost to the better boxer in his biggest fight with an otherwise
great career to look back on.
Me either. They could graft a third arm on there, and he'd still lose.Impractical Poster wrote:I'm not sure any version of Manny would beat Mayweather after seeing that fight. As much as I wanted Manny to win, Floyd's defense is just too good.sucracristo wrote:2 of the scorecards each had him winning 4 rounds. with any improvement itImpractical Poster wrote:With Manny's new improved shoulder, he should be able to win at least 4 rounds against Floyd.
Possibly...
would be a draw. there were rounds which pac won clearly. the fight went the
way everyone expected, with floyd moving and pot shotting a lot. roach told
pac to be more aggressive between rounds but pac didn't follow instructions.
would pac have won more rounds if he was more aggressive? hard to say but
after so much hype over so long and such a huge payday, pac has no excuses.
there are guys who won fights with dislocated shoulders.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YT6kSm2hua4
i'm not saying pac could have won the fight under any circumstances, but
he was a big disappointment to say the least as far as his effort level in the
biggest fight of his career. he should have left it all out there and he didn't.
if there is a rematch, he should do it for free. otherwise, just move on and
accept that he lost to the better boxer in his biggest fight with an otherwise
great career to look back on.
I agree watching the more offensive fighters is way more enjoyable.Impractical Poster wrote:My ex brother-in-law once told me something regarding football.
A great offense wins games. A great defense wins championships.
I think that's pretty much true for boxing as well. It seems, in most cases since I have been following boxing, that the best fighters in the world have a very strong defense.
I tend to like the offensive fighters more, though.
Prove it dickbreath!Lackeos wrote:Kind of like how you're lying about not having a bunch of fake accounts?KBB wrote:Ricky_ wrote:Brut do you spin a wheel or roll a dice to decide which acc to log into each morning?
Wtf are you talking about idiot?
How many times i have told you about this, seriously you need help.
Manny is a liar and a fake
i thought it was closer than most had it,tiny_acres wrote:I think he would look even more inept against Floyd.Impractical Poster wrote:With Manny's new improved shoulder, he should be able to win at least 4 rounds against Floyd.
Possibly...
He knows how he was out classed and no excuse he could come up with will
give him the confidence he needs.Manny would lose even worse in a rematch.
if that was true, italy would have wonImpractical Poster wrote:My ex brother-in-law once told me something regarding football.
A great offense wins games. A great defense wins championships.
true for NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, and practically every other sport, particularly when itImpractical Poster wrote:My ex brother-in-law once told me something regarding football.
A great offense wins games. A great defense wins championships.
I think that's pretty much true for boxing as well. It seems, in most cases since I have been following boxing, that the best fighters in the world have a very strong defense.
I tend to like the offensive fighters more, though.
Impractical Poster wrote:My ex brother-in-law once told me something regarding football.
A great offense wins games. A great defense wins championships.
I think that's pretty much true for boxing as well. It seems, in most cases since I have been following boxing, that the best fighters in the world have a very strong defense.
I tend to like the offensive fighters more, though.
It was regarding American football.man wrote:if that was true, italy would have wonImpractical Poster wrote:My ex brother-in-law once told me something regarding football.
A great offense wins games. A great defense wins championships.
almost every world title.
I thought about this. In most cases is what I'm saying. And I found Kovalev to mix his offense with his defense very well against Hopkins. I also think GGG's defense is severely underrated.Ricky_ wrote:Impractical Poster wrote:My ex brother-in-law once told me something regarding football.
A great offense wins games. A great defense wins championships.
I think that's pretty much true for boxing as well. It seems, in most cases since I have been following boxing, that the best fighters in the world have a very strong defense.
I tend to like the offensive fighters more, though.
I'd probably agree with most sports that defense can be superior, and a great defence will outdo a great offence. I don't believe that to be true of boxing however. Every so often a freak of nature comes along and very much get the feeling it's the unstoppable force that would come out on top against the immovable object. Right now, on the current scene, I can't imagine anyone being able to handle Golovkin at middleweight or Kovalev at LHW. They just hit too damn hard with amazing precision. Hopkins surviving on the brink is probably about as good as anyone could do against either right now.
right, right. i always forget what the americansImpractical Poster wrote:It was regarding American football.man wrote:if that was true, italy would have wonImpractical Poster wrote:My ex brother-in-law once told me something regarding football.
A great offense wins games. A great defense wins championships.
almost every world title.