Re: PPV sales
Posted: 21 Aug 2015, 17:49
I knew she was a boxer, Boxing is very different to MMA, It doesnt mean she will be able to compete. She is uknown in UFC and is ranked NO.9.. This is ridiculus showcased in PPV again. F#ck MMA
You knew she was a boxer, but apparently didn't know her name or the fact that she is among the most accomplished female boxers of all time.Aaronide_ger wrote:I knew she was a boxer, Boxing is very different to MMA, It doesnt mean she will be able to compete. She is uknown in UFC and is ranked NO.9.. This is ridiculus showcased in PPV again. F#ck MMA
Ohh yea? She has just TWO UFC fights and u are telling ME she is known enough to fight against Rousey?punchoutsb wrote:You knew she was a boxer, but apparently didn't know her name or the fact that she is among the most accomplished female boxers of all time.Aaronide_ger wrote:I knew she was a boxer, Boxing is very different to MMA, It doesnt mean she will be able to compete. She is uknown in UFC and is ranked NO.9.. This is ridiculus showcased in PPV again. F#ck MMA
I'd also take it from your "F#ck MMA" attitude that you are not a UFC fan, and therefore not really in a position to comment on who is known or unknown in the organization. The UFC is notoriously good at hyping the crap out of its product; you think they'd let a high level athlete from another sport compete with little fanfare? Holm is very well known in the UFC and ranked in the top ten. By the end of the build up they will have the casual fan believing she is an absolute monster who can knock out an ox with a single jab.
Rousey won't knock her out, she will submit her.Aaronide_ger wrote:Ohh yea? She has just TWO UFC fights and u are telling ME she is known enough to fight against Rousey?punchoutsb wrote:You knew she was a boxer, but apparently didn't know her name or the fact that she is among the most accomplished female boxers of all time.Aaronide_ger wrote:I knew she was a boxer, Boxing is very different to MMA, It doesnt mean she will be able to compete. She is uknown in UFC and is ranked NO.9.. This is ridiculus showcased in PPV again. F#ck MMA
I'd also take it from your "F#ck MMA" attitude that you are not a UFC fan, and therefore not really in a position to comment on who is known or unknown in the organization. The UFC is notoriously good at hyping the crap out of its product; you think they'd let a high level athlete from another sport compete with little fanfare? Holm is very well known in the UFC and ranked in the top ten. By the end of the build up they will have the casual fan believing she is an absolute monster who can knock out an ox with a single jab.
We all Know is is getting Knocked the F#ck out, She cant crack an egg with just 9 Knockouts..
U got Very far away from my point, which is that this fight is NOT PPV worthy, 99,9% Rousey will win in an one sided fight..
Can I nominate this for post of the year?Aaronide_ger wrote:I knew she was a boxer, Boxing is very different to MMA, It doesnt mean she will be able to compete. She is uknown in UFC and is ranked NO.9.. This is ridiculus showcased in PPV again. F#ck MMA
I thought she will submision Holm. I was wrong so what? You think you are funny? Many people were wrong about this.iamasadlittleboy wrote:Can I nominate this for post of the year?Aaronide_ger wrote:I knew she was a boxer, Boxing is very different to MMA, It doesnt mean she will be able to compete. She is uknown in UFC and is ranked NO.9.. This is ridiculus showcased in PPV again. F#ck MMA
Bingotiny_acres wrote:UFC is like the Barnum and Bailey circus.They can hype any fight to make it look likeAaronide_ger wrote:WTF dude.Impractical Poster wrote:You are misinformed then. They make the money because it's a great product, which, unlike boxing, pits the best against the best consistently.
Ronda vs Correia
Ronda vs Cat Zingano
Where those 2 matchups not mismatches? Are we watching the same thing? pits the best against the best? I laught at this sh#t.
@CrazyHorse U are so right, no way they did 900K, these are not the official numbers, they NEVER released official numbers.
I believe they are deceiving people.
it is matching the best at any given time.
Smoke and mirrors.That is what I think of their match making.
Do you guys actually think the match making for UFC 194 is smoke and mirrors? This is one of the best cards you will ever see in all of combat sports as far as match making goes.kidbazooka1 wrote:Bingotiny_acres wrote:[
UFC is like the Barnum and Bailey circus.They can hype any fight to make it look like
it is matching the best at any given time.
Smoke and mirrors.That is what I think of their match making.
They are great marketers. The PPVs are a small portion of what they offer. They have deals with Fox, and they offer fights on UFC Fight Pass. The free events get viewers interested, and they promote the hell out of their events. Some PPVs do lack, but that happens in every sport. But, they do pit the best against the best. Followers of the sport understand this, and that is why their PPV events don't bomb.Aaronide_ger wrote:@verballistic
How can the US people KEEP paying these PPVs thats what I dont understand, we have 3 major PPVs this year and in all boxing sites they are uploading humorous pics of people crying over "Losing all their money" from those PPVs..
WHILE IN UFC THEY KEEP MAKING event after event PPVS!!!!! they had 14 PPVs last year.. this is Ridiculus and beyond belief.