Page 2 of 4
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 13:17
by tiny_acres
palooka wrote:We've been lucky as fans to have seen Manny and Floyd in their primes, both are remarkable boxers and very contrasting styles of fighting.
Yes sir.You said it best

Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 13:19
by ttornado
zojo, wrote:ttornado wrote:]
Not 154
150 catchweight
But, what did those guys weigh come fight time?
I'm not trying to take away from Pacquiao's achievement, I have a problem with those that misrepresent the facts for their own agenda.
Margarito was the much bigger man and he took a beating.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 13:19
by punchoutsb
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 13:23
by palooka
tiny_acres wrote:palooka wrote:We've been lucky as fans to have seen Manny and Floyd in their primes, both are remarkable boxers and very contrasting styles of fighting.
Yes sir.You said it best


thank you, you're very polite.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 13:33
by stevedoc
zojo, wrote:OK, I've mentioned Carpentier twice in this thread (the guy did jump a bunch of weightclasses (from 114lbs to 175lbs).
Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.
Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000
That's a lot of money back them.
However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.
I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
Carpentier wasn't world champ at those weights amazing record but not as good as Manny's
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 13:36
by punchoutsb
stevedoc wrote:zojo, wrote:OK, I've mentioned Carpentier twice in this thread (the guy did jump a bunch of weightclasses (from 114lbs to 175lbs).
Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.
Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000
That's a lot of money back them.
However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.
I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
Carpentier wasn't world champ at those weights amazing record but not as good as Manny's
To be fair they also didn't have 4 or five world champs per division...
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 13:49
by stevedoc
punchoutsb wrote:stevedoc wrote:zojo, wrote:OK, I've mentioned Carpentier twice in this thread (the guy did jump a bunch of weightclasses (from 114lbs to 175lbs).
Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.
Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000
That's a lot of money back them.
However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.
I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
Carpentier wasn't world champ at those weights amazing record but not as good as Manny's
To be fair they also didn't have 4 or five world champs per division...
You're right about the belts but Georges career started when he was 14 so of course he went through the weights ,it's like Joe Calzaghe went from feather weight to light heavy because he weighed 9 stone as a junior amateur
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 13:52
by punchoutsb
stevedoc wrote:
You're right about the belts but Georges career started when he was 14 so of course he went through the weights ,it's like Joe Calzaghe went from feather weight to light heavy because he weighed 9 stone as a junior amateur
Manny's started at 16 in a dirt poor country from a dirt poor family...
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 13:58
by stevedoc
punchoutsb wrote:stevedoc wrote:
You're right about the belts but Georges career started when he was 14 so of course he went through the weights ,it's like Joe Calzaghe went from feather weight to light heavy because he weighed 9 stone as a junior amateur
Manny's started at 16 in a dirt poor country from a dirt poor family...
I know that the point I'm making is that Manny was world champ from fly to light middle he didn't just box at many weight like carpentier ,
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 14:03
by punchoutsb
stevedoc wrote:punchoutsb wrote:stevedoc wrote:
You're right about the belts but Georges career started when he was 14 so of course he went through the weights ,it's like Joe Calzaghe went from feather weight to light heavy because he weighed 9 stone as a junior amateur
Manny's started at 16 in a dirt poor country from a dirt poor family...
I know that the point I'm making is that Manny was world champ from fly to light middle he didn't just box at many weight like carpentier ,
I know that, and I don't dispute the facts. I'm merely pointing out that both started young and grew, which is nothing out of the ordinary. The difference is that guys like Carpentier, Langford, and Armstrong didn't have the option of selecting from FOUR world titles per weight class like Manny did.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 14:12
by man
JCS wrote:How about that Mayweather guy?
better, but somewhat less spectacular.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 14:13
by palooka
That's a good point but do the boxers really have 4 titles to shoot for? If you're highly rated in one organisation then one of the others drop you from their ratings. It's more usual for a boxer to be under a promotional banner that deals almost exclusively with one governing body.
Though there used to be one champion pwr weight class sometimes a better fighter than the champion was frozen out.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 14:22
by punchoutsb
palooka wrote:That's a good point but do the boxers really have 4 titles to shoot for? If you're highly rated in one organisation then one of the others drop you from their ratings. It's more usual for a boxer to be under a promotional banner that deals almost exclusively with one governing body.
Though there used to be one champion pwr weight class sometimes a better fighter than the champion was frozen out.
There's a lot of posturing that can be done today that couldn't have happened in the past. We've got a heavyweight champion who's fought one top 25 guy in his career. That never used to happen.
So while it's not a true "pick of litter" situation, the fact that there are 4 title belts (5 if you count the IBO) means you've got a much better chance at getting one. Manny himself has won four alphabet belts, and is only missing a WBA (he won the IBO 140 I believe). Which of the 8 divisions Manny won a title in was he the clear number one in? That would be a more concise comparison.
I mean heck, Andrien Broner was a welterweight world champion at a time when he probably wasn't even top ten in the division.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 14:28
by palooka
Didn't Primo Carnera get manoeuvred to a title he wasn't really up to holding?
I don't want to get into a 'yes/but' game and there were some funny games going on in the good old days.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 14:30
by punchoutsb
Boxing is littered with funny games, it's true.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 14:31
by palooka
punchoutsb wrote:Boxing is littered with funny games, it's true.
When I first got into boxing seriously I loved reading about Jimmy McClarnin, Barney Ross etc. I really thought a lot of McClarnin - reading the reports of his bouts and the knockouts he scored, I really rates him. Years later I read a biography and it was clear that his manager had used money and influence to make sure the weight was in McClarnin's favour every time and his big victories were against smaller men. He was able to do this because he was the big draw.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 14:41
by stevedoc
Fighters used to get frozen out a lot more than happens today look at Archie Moore or even hagler to an extent, the mob owned many fighters and it was much more corrupt than today
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 14:42
by punchoutsb
palooka wrote:punchoutsb wrote:Boxing is littered with funny games, it's true.
When I first got into boxing seriously I loved reading about Jimmy McClarnin, Barney Ross etc. I really thought a lot of McClarnin - reading the reports of his bouts and the knockouts he scored, I really rates him. Years later I read a biography and it was clear that his manager had used money and influence to make sure the weight was in McClarnin's favour every time and his big victories were against smaller men. He was able to do this because he was the big draw.
It's a fun sport, and I think part of it's legendary status comes from it's shady underbelly.
I would be interested to hear your opinion on my Pac question. Which divisions that he won titles in would you say he was the clear number one guy in?
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 14:43
by punchoutsb
stevedoc wrote:Fighters used to get frozen out a lot more than happens today look at Archie Moore or even hagler to an extent, the mob owned many fighters and it was much more corrupt than today
Corruption can take many faces.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 14:43
by palooka
stevedoc wrote:Fighters used to get frozen out a lot more than happens today look at Archie Moore or even hagler to an extent, the mob owned many fighters and it was much more corrupt than today
There was a big scandal in the 70's with Don King and The Ring magazine.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 14:46
by palooka
Off the top of my head, super bantam, feather and light welter (I can't remember who was around at lightweight) he's not been the top welters or light middle, Floyd would have beaten him).
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 16:24
by davie
palooka wrote:We've been lucky as fans to have seen Manny and Floyd in their primes, both are remarkable boxers and very contrasting styles of fighting.
This
There may be a few guys in recent decade who have matched it, such as Floyd, Hopkins or RJJ. perhaps even slightly bettered it, but not by much
but lets just appreciate the great fighters we've witnessed
It's like the Ronaldo vs Messi argument in Football (not Soccer..)
Let's just appreciate that we've witnessed 2 of the best (if not the best) in history of the game.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 18:24
by Chepppaaa
zojo, wrote:OK, I've mentioned Carpentier twice in this thread (the guy did jump a bunch of weightclasses (from 114lbs to 175lbs).
Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.
Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000
That's a lot of money back them.
However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.
I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
carpentier, stop your nonsense...the dude lost 7 fights in his first 30 fights against guys with 1-1-1 records

stop the nonsense, pacquiao career a trillion times better than carpentier
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 18:34
by punchoutsb
Chepppaaa wrote:zojo, wrote:OK, I've mentioned Carpentier twice in this thread (the guy did jump a bunch of weightclasses (from 114lbs to 175lbs).
Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.
Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000
That's a lot of money back them.
However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.
I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
carpentier, stop your nonsense...the dude lost 7 fights in his first 30 fights against guys with 1-1-1 records

stop the nonsense, pacquiao career a trillion times better than carpentier
You said you don't believe in official records because they can be fake. Don't be a stupid hypocrite...be consistent and just be stupid.
Re: Is Pacquiao's career the best career a Boxer had since ~30 years?
Posted: 09 Oct 2015, 18:39
by Chepppaaa
punchoutsb wrote:Chepppaaa wrote:zojo, wrote:OK, I've mentioned Carpentier twice in this thread (the guy did jump a bunch of weightclasses (from 114lbs to 175lbs).
Anywho, as you all know, his match vs. Dempsey was the first boxing match that had a million dollar gate.
Dempsey got a guaranteed $300,000 and George received a guaranteed $200,000
That's a lot of money back them.
However, I found an inflation calculator online that states that $200,000 in 1921 is "only" worth $2,420,742 today.
I guess the top paid boxers of today are paid pretty well compared to their historical brethren.
carpentier, stop your nonsense...the dude lost 7 fights in his first 30 fights against guys with 1-1-1 records

stop the nonsense, pacquiao career a trillion times better than carpentier
You said you don't believe in official records because they can be fake. Don't be a stupid hypocrite...be consistent and just be stupid.
hahahaha ...so if he lost once, than maybe, but 7 times

...so 7 bad descisions and actualy carp won, yeah sure