Badhusker wrote:Ricky_ wrote:Badhusker wrote:I guess Floyd should have done what Pacquiao and most others have always done - avoided or refused any type of random testing. I never thought I would see the day when someone that is willing to undergo random testing is being more scrutinized than someone that avoids random testing. I swear, as time goes on people are getting dumber and dumber.
Open your eyes beyond your desperate pathetic fanboyism. Floyd has never taken olympic style tesing, only Donaire has. Floyd's relationship USADA has been exposed as a sham, a conspiracy that allows him to cheat under the guise of "TUE's".
Go stand a street corner screaming T.U.E like a seal.
I don't expect someone as dumb as you to get anything that has a speck of common sense in it. Guys (or girl..not sure what fits) ignorant as you is a major reason we have lost a great number of good posters to this forum. Its not about Floyd and Pac. We all need to get over those two and move on. We have had 5 or 6 years of bullshit, and it needs to end. Take your butt hurt-ed-ness to your grave, but get over it here. Time to grow up.
The point is, you won't look past your beloved Floyd, yet the rest of us are concerned about the corruption of USADA within boxing. Had the shoe been on the other foot and this IV been on Pac a little crybaby Floyd bitch like yourself would be all over this like a fly on feaces.
Maybe if we just refer to Floyd as "a fighter" you'll get the point:
"A fighter" is contracting USADA, he his their client.
This "fighter" writes the terms of his contract with USADA.
If said "fighter" doesn't get the terms he and his team require they can go elsewhere.
The "fighter" stipulates in his contract conditions for being granted TUEs (exemptions) should he found to be in breach of wada banned methods or substances.
The "fighter" stipulates in his contract if a TUE (exemption) is granted, it must be kept confidential and not reported to the state athletic comission or the other team.
That fighter then breaks the WADA banned methods list by injecting himself with a banned IV, 14 times the legal limit, without a TUE.
The fighters paid-for testing agency then "retroactively" grant said fighter an exemption 20 days later and 19 days after the fight.
No reasonable explanation is ever offered from either the fighter nor USADA as to why a banned method was firstly used, and then granted an exemption.
No true boxing fan could seriously take the above scenario and think that's legit, above board, or good for the sport. Most of us think it stinks enough already that as soon as a 'star' has any clout he then gets to dictate everything from cherry picks to catchweights.... but for them to dictate terms with testing agencies they have on the payroll is a sickening display of corruption and cheating.
You don't like it cause it's your boy, but next time it will be someone else.