Re: Tyson Fury on homosexuality, the devil and Armageddon
Posted: 13 Nov 2015, 18:18
The next thing he will say is that he is willing to fight any man and his mother in a field! #hype
Did not he say he was planning to run for some kind of office.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I tend to concur. I'm not fond of bigots, however, I guess though he's fighting for the heavyweight title, not running for prime minister.Tarkus wrote:Yeah he added few wrinkles to the story, but essentially it is the same story few steps further down. World that allows evil gays is doomed. Very typical, if you know that type of people, religious zealots at the fringes of the society.
As much as I like Furys boxing I have to wonder do I really want this man as the heavy weight champion of the world.
I don't think he's very bright judging by the poo he comes out with.
Footballers get away with everything, sex assaults, racism, death by dangerous driving etc.Tarkus wrote:Did not he say he was planning to run for some kind of office.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I tend to concur. I'm not fond of bigots, however, I guess though he's fighting for the heavyweight title, not running for prime minister.Tarkus wrote:Yeah he added few wrinkles to the story, but essentially it is the same story few steps further down. World that allows evil gays is doomed. Very typical, if you know that type of people, religious zealots at the fringes of the society.
As much as I like Furys boxing I have to wonder do I really want this man as the heavy weight champion of the world.
I don't think he's very bright judging by the poo he comes out with.D
The thing is that, if he was running for office he would not be able to say such things. Hell, if he was a stupid footballer he would not get away with this. Only in boxing you can run your mouth without consequences. Bigger the stage he gets bigger the harm he will cause.
I can go and freely call you and likes of you idiots then. You wont get offended right, it is my opinion.coneye wrote: Can't really see what harm he has caused , the guy has his opinions and everyone else has theres
Touché.Pugilist-specialist wrote:What about that other Old Testament classic "an eye for an eye"?
Or is that one a bit too close to home?
You can call me what you like , no skin of my nose ,, But i can also say , a guy says he does'nt like homosexuality , and does'nt think its normal ,, he also expresses disgust at Pedaphelia , and you get all upset ,,,, hows that for truth .Your reaction to this rubbish is over the topTarkus wrote:I can go and freely call you and likes of you idiots then. You wont get offended right, it is my opinion.coneye wrote: Can't really see what harm he has caused , the guy has his opinions and everyone else has theres
Expressing your "opinion" has its limits. Hate speech and bigotry is offensive. Even if he did not do anything criminal I just cant respect someone that holds those values. I would not like the HW world champion the man that represent the sport to be a bigot.
Since you are very slow, I repeat it one last time.coneye wrote:You can call me what you like , no skin of my nose ,, But i can also say , a guy says he does'nt like homosexuality , and does'nt think its normal ,, he also expresses disgust at Pedaphelia , and you get all upset ,,,, hows that for truth .Your reaction to this rubbish is over the topTarkus wrote:I can go and freely call you and likes of you idiots then. You wont get offended right, it is my opinion.coneye wrote: Can't really see what harm he has caused , the guy has his opinions and everyone else has theres
Expressing your "opinion" has its limits. Hate speech and bigotry is offensive. Even if he did not do anything criminal I just cant respect someone that holds those values. I would not like the HW world champion the man that represent the sport to be a bigot.
Regards the devil talk , well thats just Tyson being Tyson talking bollocks to get his name out there , generate ticket sales , and make money , no different than Ali , Mayweayher , Eubanks and lots of others
But your over the top reaction HAS ME WONDERING , WHY

Who the fvck is Earl Dibbles Jr?banjo wrote:
Fucked if I know.Boxerbeetle wrote:Who the fvck is Earl Dibbles Jr?banjo wrote:
The fact that you are convinced that one must be a homosexual to defend the rights of homosexuals is another indicator of your tiny, hateful mind.coneye wrote:Are you homosexual , certainly sound that way ,, Now come on don't deny , be a proud rainbow thats a good little girl .
Now we are showing our true colors.coneye wrote:Oh and by the way the society thats allowed it is Fucked , Not just that but all the other shite we allow . He's got a good point 40 years ago it was'nt allowed , nor was a lot of other things , now due to fear of being labelled , homophobic ,, racist , bigot , and lots of other stuff we are starting to normalize all sorts of weird behaviour . Personaly i said 20 years ago these tv producers were all trying to normalize it by bringing it on the tv screens has natural , my wife laughed , said i was homophobic ,, now every soap she watches and theres a lot , has there customary gay and lesbian couple ,, she was even telling me one of them is bringing in a transvestite school teacher , all normal heh .
Why dinner party? Cant I discuss it in a pub for example? And who actually used the word evil here? Pay attention, that's your type of self righteous religious extremists.coneye wrote:So f uck off back to your dinner party and discuss how the evil Tyson Fury is going to influence the world if he does'nt get knocked out , Which he probably will by the way
Not sometimes, I'd say most of the times.banjo wrote:
I have found that many people who portray themselves as being "religious" (of whatever faith) seem to pick and choose which bits they like and don't like as justification for their actions.Pugilist-specialist wrote:What about that other Old Testament classic "an eye for an eye"?
Or is that one a bit too close to home?
It was the bits I didn't like that had the most impact.bripez wrote:I have found that many people who portray themselves as being "religious" (of whatever faith) seem to pick and choose which bits they like and don't like as justification for their actions.Pugilist-specialist wrote:What about that other Old Testament classic "an eye for an eye"?
Or is that one a bit too close to home?
At last a man with some sence , Take it for what it is Rubbush spoken by a guy renowned for speaking attention seeking rubbishBoxerbeetle wrote:I get the feeling that if Fury was asked exactly the same questions on a different day, he'd give totally different answers. I don't think he believes almost anything he says, he just says whatever comes into his head at that particular time.
I wouldn't take anything he says seriously, and it's certainly nothing to get worked up about.