BoxRec

Metal Fingers wrote:Hamburg, December 2, 2015. After his defeat against Tyson Fury four days ago Wladimir Klitschko decided to draw the contractual option for a rematch against Fury.

Wladimir Klitschko: „I was really frustrated directly after the fight but after some short nights I now know that I want to show that I am much better than my performance on Saturday. I couldn’t show my full potential at any time. This is what I want to change in the rematch – and I will. Failure is not an option.”

Bernd Bönte, CEO Klitschko Management Group (KMG): “There will be a huge worlwide interest in this fight which already can be billed as the fight of the year 2016. We received so many questions of fans and journalists after last Saturday. The new champion and his challenger will answer all of them inside the ring.”

K2 Promotions and KMG will get in touch with Tyson Fury‘s promoter Hennessy Sports to discuss the next steps like the venue and the date of the rematch.

New yerr gift!!! Thanks for sharing it.

what is an arse-bollock?

keithmoonhangover wrote:I like bollocks as much as the next man, my own of course, but these arse-bollocks comments might make me bi-curious.

Dive in, - slide down the greasy pole of my depravity.

Marlo Stanfield wrote:what is an arse-bollock?

It's arse-bollocks, not bollock.

As in "A right load of arse-bollocks"

In essence however, it's whatever you want it to be.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Marlo Stanfield wrote:what is an arse-bollock?

It's arse-bollocks, not bollock.

As in "A right load of arse-bollocks"

In essence however, it's whatever you want it to be.

if the plural is "a right load of arse-bollocks", then wouldn't the singular be an arse-bollock?

G0mez wrote:I actually had a lot of admiration and respect for Wlad before this fight, but since the wraps, the mushy canvas and the deliberate headbutt - he's come across as a bit of a prissy twat.

Ditto. Vitali has also come accross as ungracious. Mind you, he has never taken his brother's defeats well.

Marlo Stanfield wrote:what is an arse-bollock?

Piles

grannyman wrote:

Marlo Stanfield wrote:what is an arse-bollock?

Piles

Thank you.

I wouldn't be interested in the biggest borefest ive ever seen , an hour of my life wasted which i'll never get back watching the worst ever world title fight in ,my life , id rather shoot bullets in my ass than watch a pair of overhyped overpaid chumps

Marlo Stanfield wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Marlo Stanfield wrote:what is an arse-bollock?

It's arse-bollocks, not bollock.

As in "A right load of arse-bollocks"

In essence however, it's whatever you want it to be.

if the plural is "a right load of arse-bollocks", then wouldn't the singular be an arse-bollock?

No, because as standard, both of the arse-bollocks are introduced to the equation, as a pejorative description of the noun or more commonly verb in question.

However; one could say 'Jesus, look at Gary - he's making an utter arse-bollock of himself' where in essence the person described, becomes on of the pair of Arse-bollocks.

Similarly, "Look at Gary and Dave - what a couple of utter arse-bollocks they are'

As you can see, it is fairly versatile in the arsenal of one who is well trained in arts of Arse Bollocks.

I do hope this has been of help - I will later in the year be producing the definitive guide 'The Art of Arse-bollocks.' Initially only kindle, but I'm sure it will make it to paperback.

G0mez wrote:I actually had a lot of admiration and respect for Wlad before this fight, but since the wraps, the mushy canvas and the deliberate headbutt - he's come across as a bit of a prissy twat.

Spot on.

I'm so glad that Team Fury didn't allow the K2s to manipulate & bully them before the fight.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Marlo Stanfield wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
It's arse-bollocks, not bollock.

As in "A right load of arse-bollocks"

In essence however, it's whatever you want it to be.

if the plural is "a right load of arse-bollocks", then wouldn't the singular be an arse-bollock?

No, because as standard, both of the arse-bollocks are introduced to the equation, as a pejorative description of the noun or more commonly verb in question.

However; one could say 'Jesus, look at Gary - he's making an utter arse-bollock of himself' where in essence the person described, becomes on of the pair of Arse-bollocks.

Similarly, "Look at Gary and Dave - what a couple of utter arse-bollocks they are'

As you can see, it is fairly versatile in the arsenal of one who is well trained in arts of Arse Bollocks.

I do hope this has been of help - I will later in the year be producing the definitive guide 'The Art of Arse-bollocks.' Initially only kindle, but I'm sure it will make it to paperback.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
It's arse-bollocks, not bollock.

Lets get it trending on twitter #arsebollocks

Controversial wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
It's arse-bollocks, not bollock.

Lets get it trending on twitter #arsebollocks

James, would it be fair to say that Joshua V Whyte being PPV is utter arsebollocks? Am I using it in the right context there?

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
No, because as standard, both of the arse-bollocks are introduced to the equation, as a pejorative description of the noun or more commonly verb in question.

However; one could say 'Jesus, look at Gary - he's making an utter arse-bollock of himself' where in essence the person described, becomes on of the pair of Arse-bollocks.

Similarly, "Look at Gary and Dave - what a couple of utter arse-bollocks they are'

As you can see, it is fairly versatile in the arsenal of one who is well trained in arts of Arse Bollocks.

I do hope this has been of help - I will later in the year be producing the definitive guide 'The Art of Arse-bollocks.' Initially only kindle, but I'm sure it will make it to paperback.

"Fifty Shades of Arse Bollocks"

Controversial wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
It's arse-bollocks, not bollock.

Lets get it trending on twitter #arsebollocks

You mean it isn't already?

I don't know why people are saying ''why would you want to pay for the rematch blah blah blah'' - I'm just putting it out there, I will defintely pay for the rematch like most of you all will. The reason I will pay for it, is because I love boxing - I support boxing, the more money that gets generated and the more people that start viewing boxing - it will only help build the sport. I assume most of you thought the mw/pacman was a waste of money as well, but how many of you would pay for that rematch?

I just don't understand negative comments regarding PPV - do you think moaning about a fight being PPV would change it?

danamba7 wrote:

Controversial wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
It's arse-bollocks, not bollock.

Lets get it trending on twitter #arsebollocks

James, would it be fair to say that Joshua V Whyte being PPV is utter arsebollocks? Am I using it in the right context there?

You my son, are a natural arse-bollocker. I feel you might actual be the chosen one - or what we in the 'Sepulchre of the Utter Arsebollocks' (note the plural there), refer to as 'The Perineum Supreme.'

Higher praise can no man give.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

Controversial wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
It's arse-bollocks, not bollock.

Lets get it trending on twitter #arsebollocks

You mean it isn't already?

No surprisingly enough. It first appeared on twitter in 2011 and last used in 2013. Get the revival going #arsebollocks

Right, that's mine done. Let's start a movement - "#Arsebollocks to Syrian airstrikes' was mine, but of course, you should use it to express the arsebollockness of whatever irks you.

jamesmcdonnell wrote: You my son, are a natural arse-bollocker. I feel you might actual be the chosen one - or what we in the 'Sepulchre of the Utter Arsebollocks' (note the plural there), refer to as 'The Perineum Supreme.'

Hand on heart, that means a lot mate, thanks.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Right, that's mine done. Let's start a movement - "#Arsebollocks to Syrian airstrikes' was mine, but of course, you should use it to express the arsebollockness of whatever irks you.

haha found you

I love coming on this site.As a Texan I learn so many useful new terms that we just don't use here.

Controversial wrote:

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Right, that's mine done. Let's start a movement - "#Arsebollocks to Syrian airstrikes' was mine, but of course, you should use it to express the arsebollockness of whatever irks you.

haha found you

Spread the good word Brother.