The 1995-2005 tyson was the one you describe who couldnt win if someone fought back or lasted beyond 4 rounds.cfang wrote:Wasn't so scared when Mike went for him and he unloaded those uppercuts. Lewis came firing back straight away in r1 to assert. Tyson for me is a huge disappointment. I thought he was the second coming of Joe Louis when he was on the up. The let down was his inability to come back from adversity. It makes you think that against pretty much any of the top heavyweights of the past, if they could last the first 2 rounds or so and start throwing back, that he'd capitulate - even against the smaller ones.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Lewis actually looked scared for the first round when he fought Mike. That being said, Lennox is as wrong for Mike as Tyson could be for him. If Mike doesn't get him out early. Lennox beats him up. Holyfield beats any Tyson, anytime and anywhere.
The 86-1991 beast was a very very different thing.he relished a fight and ive rarely seen a hw fighter fire back with such intensity when hit hard. Look at the bruno fight.look at the 12th round of the bonecrusher fight when mike takes that hail mary right,immediately he fires back as if the fight was just starting and hecwanted to fight thru the bell to rounds 13'14'15.he walked thru tuckers uppercut, the nost devastating puncher of the time razor ruddocks punches could do nothing to extinguish tysons lust to prove his chin.again at round 20 ,tyson seemed as desirous for battle as round 1.
But of course the douglas fight where for once in 40 odd fights the stars aligned,the banshees and full moon were out,and tyson had ffucked 1 too many japanese whore while misding 1 training camp too many and he got beaten by buster douglas on a night buster keaton would have beaten him.
Funny how the same people dont use lennox lewis"s lying down after one punch (the kind of one punch tyson took in the douglas,ruddock,bruno,smith and Tucker fights and kept fighting) as evidence lennox would lie down when hit
