Page 2 of 2
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 06 Jan 2016, 18:08
by Boxerbeetle
Tuan_Jim wrote:That can't be right. Riddick Blowe dates back to 2002, right when you had to first register to post, and yet he's still only a super middle? In 2001 I recall you could choose to sign in or not, and simply post as a guest, and I'm not sure the forum even existed in 2000.
Yep, super middle is the highest classification at the moment, the forum's not been going long enough for anyone to be higher.
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 06 Jan 2016, 18:19
by Tuan_Jim
This forum, like boxing itself, has allowed itself to grow needlessly complicated.
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 06 Jan 2016, 19:05
by CharlesListon
I'm referring to myself as a light-featherweight. Or junior - featherweight. I'm an interim diamond champion.
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 07 Jan 2016, 09:03
by J
jamesmcdonnell wrote:J wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Blimey - did you lose a leg in a freak accident?
lol no mate type 2 diabetes.
no big deal just made me change my lifestyle, well that the mrs liking the booze too much made me cut back too.
All good mate, you know me cant keep a good dog down
Whoops sorry mate - didn't realise it was that serious! You're not completely Tee-total are you, I couldn't handle that thought.
Been on a bit of a health kick myself lately. Cut the old booze down a fair bit.
We'll have to do this much meetup one of these days, I'm in the Netherlands in a couple of weeks, but only on a 12 hour layover on the way to Rio so won't have time to do a trip to Rotterdam I don't think.
Hope all is good with you.
wife is mate not me, drink at weekend only and moderately until she goes to uk then a get twizzled on whatever I can lay my hands on, at least herb is legal here, a bit of everything rather than a lot of one thing basically pal!
dropped you a pm mate will be back in uk april, see if we can sort something out.
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 09 Jan 2016, 14:05
by gb
Reckon I'm a very inactive middleweight.
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 09 Jan 2016, 17:35
by Emmseegee
The purpose of the post is simply just to see what weight division I have wobbled into.
Ok, super Bantamweight.... Does that mean Im only allowed arguments with others in my weight division?
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 10 Jan 2016, 15:37
by Monte Fisto
Emmseegee wrote:The purpose of the post is simply just to see what weight division I have wobbled into.
Ok, super Bantamweight.... Does that mean Im only allowed arguments with others in my weight division?
That's a great idea.. There should be 1 week whereby we can only post under the topic of our weight category.
Re: Posters being a division classification
Posted: 10 Jan 2016, 17:05
by Britannian Stallion
Hmmmm