Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Ilya Muromets »

Martin won the baloney belt without landing a single punch!
Loki
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1110
Joined: 17 May 2004, 12:59

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Loki »

That's kinda hard on Martin, I don't think he's that bad at all. He does the fundimentals well and has size and power. He was beating Glaskov before knee gave way.

He's certainly not the worst champion. The HW division was crap pre-Tyson post Holmes dominance (everyone seems to forgets that).

John Ruiz, Valuev, Sam Peter, Maskaev IMO were worse champions.
jas80s
Cruiserweight
Posts: 572
Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 20:55

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by jas80s »

How much can we know about him at all at this point?

calling him the worst ever is almost as bad as calling him the best ever.

Of course, with all the trinkets out there, it's easier than ever to become a champ so guys in the lower third all time are going to be
seen more often from now on....no news there.
Bricks
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3916
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 12:42

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Bricks »

I cant agree with this thread.martin looks quite decent and could develop in what is still a weak division.

He has some power and athleticism
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Horse »

Loki wrote:John Ruiz, Valuev, Sam Peter, Maskaev IMO were worse champions.
At the moment Martin is a worse champion than those fighters.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Ruiz is as accomplished as wlad and would fair well in wlads hugathons. Very close fight.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Badhusker »

More BS from people that don't seem to want new up and comers be successful. Give him a chance to prove himself. Its not his fault he got a shot at a title and took it. He is a decent fighter, time will tell how good. To say he is the worst ever is a stupid thing to say.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Rexob »

I feel he maybe a bit unappreciated here ?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Horse »

Rexob wrote:I feel he maybe a bit unappreciated here ?
Why should he be appreciated?

On paper he is an awful champion. Perhaps he will go on to prove himself a worthy title holder, but he probably won't.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5738
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Cyclops »

Loki wrote:John Ruiz, Valuev, Sam Peter, Maskaev IMO were worse champions.
No they weren't.
Loki
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1110
Joined: 17 May 2004, 12:59

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Loki »

clopixolacuphase wrote:
Loki wrote:John Ruiz, Valuev, Sam Peter, Maskaev IMO were worse champions.
No they weren't.
When I say worse champions, I of course mean potential wise. I think Martin has been lambasted unfairly; there was only one winner against Glaskov pre-ACL rupture.

Taking into consideration what I've seen including tools, skill and boxing IQ (Glaskov has amateur pedigree and Martin was outboxing him) - I think a few people will be surprised where Martin ends up. He's tall and a southpaw plus clearly has pop.

I'll wager he defends his title a few times and I'm confident (only he has a real problem taking a shot) he will be 'potentially' better than all the aforementioned. Cmon, all four were awful.
Loki
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1110
Joined: 17 May 2004, 12:59

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Loki »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Ruiz is as accomplished as wlad and would fair well in wlads hugathons. Very close fight.
This idiotic beyond belief. I admit Wladimir and Ruiz held a lot, but this is ridiculous.

I don't remember a memorable title defence Ruiz had or a defence that ended in a KO. His best moment was being starched by Tua in 20 seconds.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24713
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Tony1244 »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Ruiz is as accomplished as wlad and would fair well in wlads hugathons. Very close fight.

You're kidding right?
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Loki wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Ruiz is as accomplished as wlad and would fair well in wlads hugathons. Very close fight.
This idiotic beyond belief. I admit Wladimir and Ruiz held a lot, but this is ridiculous.

I don't remember a memorable title defence Ruiz had or a defence that ended in a KO. His best moment was being starched by Tua in 20 seconds.
:lol:
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Tony1244 wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Ruiz is as accomplished as wlad and would fair well in wlads hugathons. Very close fight.

You're kidding right?
Nope
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24713
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Tony1244 »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Ruiz is as accomplished as wlad and would fair well in wlads hugathons. Very close fight.

You're kidding right?
Nope

Both Klitschkos would have put Ruiz to sleep. comparing Ruiz to either Klitschko cannot be taken seriously.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Tony1244 wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:

You're kidding right?
Nope

Both Klitschkos would have put Ruiz to sleep. comparing Ruiz to either Klitschko cannot be taken seriously.
Ruiz is definitely more accomplished than vitali. Not even close.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24713
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Tony1244 »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
Tony1244 wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote: Nope

Both Klitschkos would have put Ruiz to sleep. comparing Ruiz to either Klitschko cannot be taken seriously.
Ruiz is definitely more accomplished than vitali. Not even close.
If you're attempting to write one of the top 10 dumbest statements I have ever read online you have a lot of competition. Having said that you are doing quite well. You're statement is wedged between Israel is an ally of ISIS and Sarah Palin is very smart.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Considering its 100% accurate, that doesn't bode well for your reasoning.
Tony1244
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 24713
Joined: 03 Jun 2010, 21:31

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Tony1244 »

Loki wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Ruiz is as accomplished as wlad and would fair well in wlads hugathons. Very close fight.
This idiotic beyond belief. I admit Wladimir and Ruiz held a lot, but this is ridiculous.

I don't remember a memorable title defence Ruiz had or a defence that ended in a KO. His best moment was being starched by Tua in 20 seconds.

He's trolling, and/or a Ruiz nuthugger.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Neither, he has a better resume than vitali. Beating holyfield alone is greater than anything vitali did.
jockpunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 524
Joined: 28 Oct 2005, 16:20

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by jockpunk »

If they would have fought, I have no doubt vitali would have won. That said, if you look at their resumes ruiz has the better scalps. He was much, much better than martin is.
asdfjkl
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by asdfjkl »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Neither, he has a better resume than vitali. Beating holyfield alone is greater than anything vitali did.
:doh:
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

jockpunk wrote:If they would have fought, I have no doubt vitali would have won. That said, if you look at their resumes ruiz has the better scalps. He was much, much better than martin is.
:TU:
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: Charles Martin (IBF Heavyweight "champion") is the worst titleholder I've ever seen

Post by Ilya Muromets »

x2x wrote:Martin won the baloney belt without landing a single punch!

I wouldn't have used the word "worst" for the title of this thread. I would have said "the most undeserving".
Post Reply