Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Think Rose might stop him. Although he's nothing special he's less shopworn than Macklin.

Would rather see Macklin retired already, a defeat here should see to that.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by TheCobra »

Good chance for Rose to get a good name on his slate. Macklin way past it now - too many wars finally caught up with him.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by Rexob »

Probably be a bit like Mackilns last fight, with Macklin struggling for a points win, then trying to convince himself he has still got it in an IFLTV interview.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by palooka »

Where's the weigh in?
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3344
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by Twinkle Toes »

They are both easy to hit, I reckon it will be a war - I would favour Rose, but Macklin is going to have a lot of success getting his own shots off too.
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1799
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by tigermoth87 »

Macklin was good but is shot and Rose is barely Euro level anyway so both are on the same level. Good 50-50 fight. I think Macklin takes it though. He can still bang and Rose lacks punch resistance. Reckon Mack will stop him in the 9th or 10th round. Think it will be a fun fight.

Isn't this fight an eliminator? Surely there's better and more deserving fighters for a world title eliminator than Rose and Macklin.
Yes We Can
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2087
Joined: 29 Sep 2010, 17:16

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by Yes We Can »

I think Macklin will stop him pretty early. He may be past prime but Rose is not very good.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by JimJim2009 »

Remarkable that this is a wbc eliminator.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by expe »

JimJim2009 wrote:Remarkable that this is a wbc eliminator.
I'm not sure it actually is, Hearn's claiming that but he said the same about Warrington-Tubieron and Campbell-Coyle, no mention of it from the WBC with both fights, just that it was for their international title. Even the WBC wouldn't sanction an eliminator between an unranked fighter and another fighter that's ranked 11 at the weight below. Probably just Hearn lying.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by ste1983 »

fizzjambo wrote:Macklin is pretty close to shot but I've always thought Rose was very, very ordinary. I think it'll be pretty even but see Rose winning a MD type decision. I think both will be retired by 3 fights time
Bad choice of words for him and his pals at the moment
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by magwitch »

stu 27 wrote:Rose wins this
he is jolean lescotts cousin :TU:

Oh well I think I'll put a twenty on him then if he's Jolean Lescott's cousin :TU:
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by rhino222 »

imho..both are spoilt goods. it will be close, macklin digs better and rose has the worse chin. therefore, much as he is spent, i fancy macklin in this one.
bigB
Cruiserweight
Posts: 470
Joined: 24 Dec 2010, 08:13

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by bigB »

Good fight, think Rose wins on points.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by rhino222 »

its starting to look like a 'pick em' based on everyones comments.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Macklin v Rose confirmed for April 9th

Post by palooka »

rhino222 wrote:imho..both are spoilt goods. it will be close, macklin digs better and rose has the worse chin. therefore, much as he is spent, i fancy macklin in this one.
I can still remember that Macklin hook that wrecked Asikainen for the European, that was some punch!
Post Reply