Page 2 of 2
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 28 Feb 2016, 14:18
by Stuarty
Horse wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:That you're a bit dull.
How rude.
Apologies. No offence intended. Was just a knee jerk reaction to you enjoying the Fury fight more than last night. BDSM is in fashion nowadays. I respect your opinion and enjoy your p4p list every month.
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 28 Feb 2016, 14:23
by Horse
Stuarty30 wrote:Apologies. No offence intended. Was just a knee jerk reaction to you enjoying the Fury fight more than last night. BDSM is in fashion nowadays. I respect your opinion and enjoy your p4p list every month.

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 28 Feb 2016, 14:54
by Tarkus
It was a great fight. I enjoyed it thoroughly. Then again I did not pay a penny. Half of the twitter was moaning how bad it was. lol Thats what boxing is. People just want a barroom brawl. And to think for idiot Fury to complain about the lack of action after 12 rounds of running with Klit. Once again he shows what a hypocrite pudendum he is.
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 28 Feb 2016, 15:09
by reggaereggae
Tarkus wrote:It was a great fight. I enjoyed it thoroughly. Then again I did not pay a penny. Half of the twitter was moaning how bad it was. lol Thats what boxing is. People just want a barroom brawl. And to think for idiot Fury to complain about the lack of action after 12 rounds of running with Klit. Once again he shows what a hypocrite pudendum he is.
It was a great fight??!!

are you serious? Were you smoking crack whilst you were watching it? That s the only explanation I can think of considering this damp squid of a fight.....
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 28 Feb 2016, 15:20
by watsupdoc87
ha fuking hilarious, and true

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 28 Feb 2016, 15:55
by Teddy's Toupee
reggaereggae wrote:Tarkus wrote:It was a great fight. I enjoyed it thoroughly. Then again I did not pay a penny. Half of the twitter was moaning how bad it was. lol Thats what boxing is. People just want a barroom brawl. And to think for idiot Fury to complain about the lack of action after 12 rounds of running with Klit. Once again he shows what a hypocrite pudendum he is.
It was a great fight??!!

are you serious? Were you smoking crack whilst you were watching it? That s the only explanation I can think of considering this damp squid of a fight.....
Surely squid are always damp, they live in the sea.
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 28 Feb 2016, 16:06
by punchers chance
Stuarty30 wrote:tigermoth87 wrote:I agree with him BUT, it was better than his fight with Wlad.
Agree. Shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house.....
What if you live in a caravan?
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 28 Feb 2016, 16:21
by Teddy's Toupee
punchers chance wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:tigermoth87 wrote:I agree with him BUT, it was better than his fight with Wlad.
Agree. Shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house.....
What if you live in a caravan?
Depends if it's made of glass
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 28 Feb 2016, 16:42
by rd350lc
punchers chance wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:tigermoth87 wrote:I agree with him BUT, it was better than his fight with Wlad.
Agree. Shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house.....
What if you live in a caravan?
Don't come a knocking if the van is a rocking .
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 28 Feb 2016, 17:05
by Stuarty
punchers chance wrote:Stuarty30 wrote:tigermoth87 wrote:I agree with him BUT, it was better than his fight with Wlad.
Agree. Shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house.....
What if you live in a caravan?
Glass caravans?
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 28 Feb 2016, 17:12
by handsofstone
Neither Fury/Klitschko or Frampton/Quigg were classics but i did enjoy watching Fury's win,even being at the fight last night and being rat arsed pissed i could still tell the fight was shockingly bad
And i usually see the good in all things boxing
![[icon_e_sad.gif] :verysad:](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 28 Feb 2016, 17:18
by Horse
handsofstone wrote:Neither Fury/Klitschko or Frampton/Quigg were classics but i did enjoy watching Fury's win,even being at the fight last night and being rat arsed pissed i could still tell the fight was shockingly bad
And i usually see the good in all things boxing
![[icon_e_sad.gif] :verysad:](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
You didn't think the 2nd half was at least alright?
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 28 Feb 2016, 17:21
by handsofstone
Horse wrote:handsofstone wrote:Neither Fury/Klitschko or Frampton/Quigg were classics but i did enjoy watching Fury's win,even being at the fight last night and being rat arsed pissed i could still tell the fight was shockingly bad
And i usually see the good in all things boxing
![[icon_e_sad.gif] :verysad:](./images/smilies/icon_e_sad.gif)
You didn't think the 2nd half was at least alright?
It was better than the 1st half granted but so was Nelson/De Leon
I only liked 1 round the whole fight,cant remember what round it was exactly but it was the 1 where a fight broke out
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 29 Feb 2016, 05:55
by BitPlayer
Remember he called it made his comment just after Round 8, at which point it was far worse than his and Wlad's fight which had more punches and far more movement (not to mention Fury's antics in the ring) from people shifting around about double the weight one of which was almost 40. It did get better is the last rounds but in the end Frampton and Quigg landed just under the number of punches Fury landed on Wlad from the totals I've seen,
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 29 Feb 2016, 06:33
by Ricky_

as bad as FrampQuigg was, it was infinitely more exciting than watching those 2 overgrown mongos fumble about the ring doing literally nothing for 12 rounds.
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 29 Feb 2016, 10:08
by Tarkus
reggaereggae wrote:Tarkus wrote:It was a great fight. I enjoyed it thoroughly. Then again I did not pay a penny. Half of the twitter was moaning how bad it was. lol Thats what boxing is. People just want a barroom brawl. And to think for idiot Fury to complain about the lack of action after 12 rounds of running with Klit. Once again he shows what a hypocrite pudendum he is.
It was a great fight??!!

are you serious? Were you smoking crack whilst you were watching it? That s the only explanation I can think of considering this damp squid of a fight.....
Probably other way around. Probably I was not pissed out of my head like lot of you and so I could appreciate the finer art of boxing.

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 01 Mar 2016, 05:30
by taffytoon
Horse wrote:taffytoon wrote:The only sex he has is with himself; putting the toe clippers into the equation spices things up

What started your obsession with me?
Was it when I insulted Nathan Cleverly's reign as WBO champion?
God no; I have known you to be a pudendum way before that

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 01 Mar 2016, 07:42
by J
Teddy's Toupee wrote:reggaereggae wrote:Tarkus wrote:It was a great fight. I enjoyed it thoroughly. Then again I did not pay a penny. Half of the twitter was moaning how bad it was. lol Thats what boxing is. People just want a barroom brawl. And to think for idiot Fury to complain about the lack of action after 12 rounds of running with Klit. Once again he shows what a hypocrite pudendum he is.
It was a great fight??!!

are you serious? Were you smoking crack whilst you were watching it? That s the only explanation I can think of considering this damp squid of a fight.....
Surely squid are always damp, they live in the sea.
common mistake lol...I think he meant damp squib.
squib being a type of dynamite stick, being damp doesn't go off.
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 01 Mar 2016, 11:19
by Tarkus
J wrote:Teddy's Toupee wrote:reggaereggae wrote:
It was a great fight??!!

are you serious? Were you smoking crack whilst you were watching it? That s the only explanation I can think of considering this damp squid of a fight.....
Surely squid are always damp, they live in the sea.
common mistake lol...I think he meant damp squib.
squib being a type of dynamite stick, being damp doesn't go off.
To continue this fascinating topic. Actually squid is rarely damp, as it is impossible to be damp while in the water. And a damp squid out of the water is indeed a terrible sight.
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 01 Mar 2016, 11:29
by J
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 01 Mar 2016, 11:29
by J
yes I know I need help.
Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg
Posted: 01 Mar 2016, 11:31
by Stuarty
Tarkus wrote:J wrote:Teddy's Toupee wrote:
Surely squid are always damp, they live in the sea.
common mistake lol...I think he meant damp squib.
squib being a type of dynamite stick, being damp doesn't go off.
To continue this fascinating topic. Actually squid is rarely damp, as it is impossible to be damp while in the water. And a damp squid out of the water is indeed a terrible sight.
