BoxRec

Horse wrote:

davie wrote:Well they're right enough, you can be a fanny sometimes.

Who isn't?

So if some time I say, 'horse this is one of those issues where you're being a bit of a fanny, in my opinion', is it likely to make you consider rethinking your approach or position?

Or at least get a 'ok, '. ?

Counter-puncher wrote:

davie wrote:

Horse wrote:Charming.

Well they're right enough, you can be a fanny sometimes.

'a bit of a fanny sometimes' isn't too rude or unfair, IMO.

But then most of us can be a bit of a fanny sometimes, over something.

Or, say, 'a bit of a berk'. Thats fair enough where most of us are concerned, at some point or other

I'm a fanny sometimes too, occasionally a propper whalloper.
Not sure I've ever been a berk though.

Counter-puncher wrote:So if some time I say, 'horse this is one of those issues where you're being a bit of a fanny, in my opinion', is it likely to make you consider rethinking your approach or position?

Or at least get a 'ok, '. ?

Probably not.

Horse wrote:

Counter-puncher wrote:So if some time I say, 'horse this is one of those issues where you're being a bit of a fanny, in my opinion', is it likely to make you consider rethinking your approach or position?

Or at least get a 'ok, '. ?

Probably not.

You're nothing if not predictable.

I'm not sure I'm a fanny on here, but I'm definitely sometimes a bit of a berk, or a bit of a twat.

In my defence its probably mostly related to PIGG, who is a known gaping chasm of a pudendum, so, you know.

Horse wrote:

Counter-puncher wrote:So if some time I say, 'horse this is one of those issues where you're being a bit of a fanny, in my opinion', is it likely to make you consider rethinking your approach or position?

Or at least get a 'ok, '. ?

Probably not.

Horse, this is one of those issues where you're being a bit of a fanny, in my opinion

davie wrote:You're nothing if not predictable.

Yet you didn't predict my first post in this thread.

Aha!

Horse made a funny

Counter-puncher wrote:Horse, this is one of those issues where you're being a bit of a fanny, in my opinion

Then maybe I should consider rethinking my approach and position.

yez are all a pack of jelly bean retards

Horse wrote:

Counter-puncher wrote:Horse, this is one of those issues where you're being a bit of a fanny, in my opinion

Then maybe I should consider rethinking my approach and position.

This has the appearance of social interaction, almost.

In your face, kingfield.

In the end, i think people get frustrated. this is the only place we can come to chat (bar those of us who know our local pro gym and fighters) and not have to discuss boxing with people who want to debate if Mr T beats Mike Tyson. When people are contrary just for the sake of it, some will get pissed off.

thepocketrocket wrote:In the end, i think people get frustrated. this is the only place we can come to chat (bar those of us who know our local pro gym and fighters) and not have to discuss boxing with people who want to debate if Mr T beats Mike Tyson. When people are contrary just for the sake of it, some will get pissed off.

mr t cant drink milk without falling asleep, no way he beats tyson

watsupdoc87 wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:In the end, i think people get frustrated. this is the only place we can come to chat (bar those of us who know our local pro gym and fighters) and not have to discuss boxing with people who want to debate if Mr T beats Mike Tyson. When people are contrary just for the sake of it, some will get pissed off.

mr t cant drink milk without falling asleep, no way he beats tyson

Who wins a 1985, Mr T or 1985, Tyson?

watsupdoc87 wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:In the end, i think people get frustrated. this is the only place we can come to chat (bar those of us who know our local pro gym and fighters) and not have to discuss boxing with people who want to debate if Mr T beats Mike Tyson. When people are contrary just for the sake of it, some will get pissed off.

mr t cant drink milk without falling asleep, no way he beats tyson

He doesn't like flying, but like Calzaghe, that would pass when Tyson was old, shot, and there for the taking!

Rexob wrote:

watsupdoc87 wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:In the end, i think people get frustrated. this is the only place we can come to chat (bar those of us who know our local pro gym and fighters) and not have to discuss boxing with people who want to debate if Mr T beats Mike Tyson. When people are contrary just for the sake of it, some will get pissed off.

mr t cant drink milk without falling asleep, no way he beats tyson

Who wins a 1985, Mr T or 1985, Tyson?

Nooooooooooooooo LOL

Rexob wrote:

watsupdoc87 wrote:

thepocketrocket wrote:In the end, i think people get frustrated. this is the only place we can come to chat (bar those of us who know our local pro gym and fighters) and not have to discuss boxing with people who want to debate if Mr T beats Mike Tyson. When people are contrary just for the sake of it, some will get pissed off.

mr t cant drink milk without falling asleep, no way he beats tyson

Who wins a 1985, Mr T or 1985, Tyson?

1985, easy, rocky beats them both after defeating drago, actually hed already beaten cluber lange at that point i think

Yeah, I don't think Mr T (Clubber) ever got over the second Rocky fight, so Tyson coming up in 85, would have done a job on
Mr T (Clubber)

Rexob wrote:Yeah, I don't think Mr T (Clubber) ever got over the second Rocky fight, so Tyson coming up in 85, would have done a job on
Mr T (Clubber)

what i dont get is how did rocky ever get his title shot in the first place, i thought you had to be top 15 ranked, but appolo creed just picked the italian stalion out of a big bunch of names, and his record wasnt good enough to be top 15. i blame al haymon

watsupdoc87 wrote:

Rexob wrote:Yeah, I don't think Mr T (Clubber) ever got over the second Rocky fight, so Tyson coming up in 85, would have done a job on
Mr T (Clubber)

what i dont get is how did rocky ever get his title shot in the first place, i thought you had to be top 15 ranked, but appolo creed just picked the italian stalion out of a big bunch of names, and his record wasnt good enough to be top 15. i blame al haymon

I blame Chuck Wepner.

watsupdoc87 wrote:

Rexob wrote:Yeah, I don't think Mr T (Clubber) ever got over the second Rocky fight, so Tyson coming up in 85, would have done a job on
Mr T (Clubber)

what i dont get is how did rocky ever get his title shot in the first place, i thought you had to be top 15 ranked, but appolo creed just picked the italian stalion out of a big bunch of names, and his record wasnt good enough to be top 15. i blame al haymon

Duh. It's obviously because without a ranked contender what the fight needed was a novelty. And it was being held in the land of opportunity, right?

davie wrote:

Horse wrote:

davie wrote:As I've said above. There's plenty you can call Horse.

Charming.

Well they're right enough, you can be a fanny sometimes.

Ahhhh, I'm glad this thread ended well.

It had the potential to go badly wrong

Horse wrote:

davie wrote:Well they're right enough, you can be a fanny sometimes.

Who isn't?

Yo mamma

palooka wrote:

Horse wrote:

davie wrote:Well they're right enough, you can be a fanny sometimes.

Who isn't?

Yo mamma

Yo mamma's plug has arrived.