BoxRec

I think the only time we get a glimpse of the real Joshua is when he's sticking his tongue out, smirking, shaking his fist at stricken opponents, with the needle between them I could (to some extent) see why he did that against Whyte, but I found it a bit distasteful when he was doing it to poor Denis Bahktov who was being outclassed from the outset.

Inb4AJBItesFurysEarOff

Stevieb8006 wrote:Are people getting upset that someone dare say AJ is anything less than a prime Mike Tyson again

Power of Tyson, speed of Ali

Tyson fury is the king of boxing and all martial arts


Joshua has no right to question his Master

let joshua squabble with Martin while the lord of the ring tyson fury judges his unruly peasant's

I don't have anything Against AJ, but I'd be pissed off to see my title stolen from me and other earning fotunes from it too. Fury is only going to get more and more nasty and vocal.

Popcorn Gif.

Nightmare Roy wrote:I don't have anything Against AJ, but I'd be pissed off to see my title stolen from me and other earning fotunes from it too. Fury is only going to get more and more nasty and vocal.

Popcorn Gif.

Fury is the real king

And the best street fighter out of the lot of them !

Starboxer wrote:

Nightmare Roy wrote:I don't have anything Against AJ, but I'd be pissed off to see my title stolen from me and other earning fotunes from it too. Fury is only going to get more and more nasty and vocal.

Popcorn Gif.

Fury is the real king

And the best street fighter out of the lot of them !

In a street fight AJ would win all day. Snatch is just a film.

He wasn't a street fighter, he was a bareknuckle boxing champ, or in other words hard as fornicate. I think in or out of the ring it'd play out much the same, Fury moves away until Joshuas stamina fail then he gets the Kayo.

Street fighting isn't a sport as far as I know. It's for divs and those who claim to be great at it are the biggest divs of all.

Of the two I'd suspect Fury would be less likely to actually take part in such bollocks, so maybe Joshua would be the better "street fighter"

Where it matters, in the ring, Fury is the man right now.

Don't think Tyson Fury has ever had a 'streetfight' or a bare knuckle match. He's been focused on the gloved art since young and didn't mess around with all that other crap. Starboxer is just trolling.

Fury I the type of fella to take his shirt off and fight in a field, it's I his genes, is AJ made of the same stuff?

Fury would beat Joshua easily.

It would be a dull, boring, tedious fight with Fury fighting pretty much the way he did vs Wlad. Switching his stance, being on the defensive whilst doing just enough to win the rounds whilst Joshua looks lost and confused at being in the ring with someone who can actually box.

lillywhite14 wrote:Street fighting isn't a sport as far as I know. It's for divs and those who claim to be great at it are the biggest divs of all.

Of the two I'd suspect Fury would be less likely to actually take part in such bollocks, so maybe Joshua would be the better "street fighter"

Where it matters, in the ring, Fury is the man right now.

Fury has said in interviews he thinks bare nuckle is a load of bollox.

Coco wrote:Fury I the type of fella to take his shirt off and fight in a field, it's I his genes, is AJ made of the same stuff?

I didn't realise there's a genetic component to fighting in fields, I'm sure the BMJ will be fascinated to hear your evidence.

Nightmare Roy wrote:

lillywhite14 wrote:Street fighting isn't a sport as far as I know. It's for divs and those who claim to be great at it are the biggest divs of all.

Of the two I'd suspect Fury would be less likely to actually take part in such bollocks, so maybe Joshua would be the better "street fighter"

Where it matters, in the ring, Fury is the man right now.

Fury has said in interviews he thinks bare nuckle is a load of bollox.

He's a smart cookie, so not surprised at all he would have that view

tigermoth87 wrote:Fury would beat Joshua easily.

It would be a dull, boring, tedious fight with Fury fighting pretty much the way he did vs Wlad. Switching his stance, being on the defensive whilst doing just enough to win the rounds whilst Joshua looks lost and confused at being in the ring with someone who can actually box.

Tyson fury is the. Hw King


Why does he pick Martin to splat Joshua ?

Starboxer wrote:Tyson fury is the. Hw King


Why does he pick Martin to splat Joshua ?

because he thinks he knows everything ??????????????????

martin could cause an upset, and i'd like to see it.

unlikely, but he could.

Offal wrote:I think the only time we get a glimpse of the real Joshua is when he's sticking his tongue out, smirking, shaking his fist at stricken opponents, with the needle between them I could (to some extent) see why he did that against Whyte, but I found it a bit distasteful when he was doing it to poor Denis Bahktov who was being outclassed from the outset.

I think this sort of thing needs to be noted better, it's fair enough to still like him, flaws and all, but there does seem to be something of a PR whitewash with him that most believe.
Anyway I made a html5 of it viewable here.
https://gfycat.com/GiddyElaborateIggypops

Not really slagging him off is he?, the more I watch AJ, the more I think "Bruno"

Oiky wrote:martin could cause an upset, and i'd like to see it.

unlikely, but he could.

It's not that unlikely is it? We're not talking Tyson-Douglass are we?

banjo wrote:Not really slagging him off is he?, the more I watch AJ, the more I think "Bruno"

Far more relaxed in the ring than Bruno ever was.

Starboxer wrote:Tyson fury is the. Hw King


Why does he pick Martin to splat Joshua ?

because it is contentious, and keeps people talking about him.

Fury's just playing the game, he knows him and AJ are seemingly on a collision course.