BoxRec

Undefeated49-0 wrote:Why would anyone want to see this garbage fight again, two boring and non-skilled HWs hurling blows with no intent to really win or hurt the other then only to come together in a slow dance waltz that puts everyone to sleep.

Klitschko is the modern day John HuggaBoxer Ruiz.

Quoting you from a previous topic: "An objective and differing opinion is not appreciated here, they want everyone to be the same. If you do then you are an outcast."

Yes, if you claim to be objective as you call Klitschko "non-skilled" then you should be outcast. 64 wins, including 22 in a row, does not come from a person lacking skill. Generally boring in a heavyweight era lacking a depth of talent, yes. Non-skilled while shutting out Haye, Povetkin, Chambers and Chagaev collectively in the midst of 22 straight wins, fail.

I haven't watched a Klitschko fight live since he fought Haye because I need the ability to fast-forward. However, if you can't watch him and see 3-4 skills that he does better than anyone in the division then you are either a dishonest troll or a casual boxing fan.

And judging from your name, you likely have a life-sized Mayweather poster in your bedroom. I would use the exact same argument against the trolls who call Mayweather boring and overrated, no matter how much I dislike the clown.

I am also sure Wladamir had "no intent to win". Who would want to be heavyweight champion for at least another 6-12 months? Might as well take a break. More objectivity in your opinion. Very impressive sentence.

Why?

Possibly the worst title fight in years. If Wlad wins, they might try to make a trilogy.

What type of person could be interested in the possibility of 36 rounds of what we saw?

Loki wrote: A side question; have two HW or Super Heavyweight Olympic champions ever fought for a pro world title?

Frazier-Foreman and Wlad-Povetkin. Can't think of any others.