BoxRec

keithmoonhangover wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
You must be a millionaire or have a massive schlong, because your patter stinks.

Why are you bitter Keith? Maybe it's you who doth protest too much.... Tuan_Jim is one of the wittiest posters here and I enjoy his posts. Keith - Are you intimidated by a poster with a superior turn of phrase??? Honestly I'm confused by your vitriol....

Even if you argue that Tuan_Jim is cynical.... Well of course he is! He's a boxing fan! No serious boxing fan with more than a quarter of an inch of brain could fail to be cynical about the boxing world....

I'm not bitter mate, I love all of my BoxRec chums, except for the Mr Jim, who immediately went on the offensive against me within his first dozen posts, claiming to know my level of boxing knowledge inside out. Got no time for wankers like that mate.

Ok... so you say you attack his posts just because you had a disagreement early on? So you're attacking him with an ad hominem argument? Surely on a respected and mature forum like this, content and argument are more important than personality? Can you post the threads on which you argued so that I can get the bigger picture? Cheers

keithmoonhangover wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:Every night he jerks off over Internet porn

Damn right. Midget porn normally.

Kinky!

reggaereggae wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:
Why are you bitter Keith? Maybe it's you who doth protest too much.... Tuan_Jim is one of the wittiest posters here and I enjoy his posts. Keith - Are you intimidated by a poster with a superior turn of phrase??? Honestly I'm confused by your vitriol....

Even if you argue that Tuan_Jim is cynical.... Well of course he is! He's a boxing fan! No serious boxing fan with more than a quarter of an inch of brain could fail to be cynical about the boxing world....

I'm not bitter mate, I love all of my BoxRec chums, except for the Mr Jim, who immediately went on the offensive against me within his first dozen posts, claiming to know my level of boxing knowledge inside out. Got no time for wankers like that mate.

Ok... so you say you attack his posts just because you had a disagreement early on? So you're attacking him with an ad hominem argument? Surely on a respected and mature forum like this, content and argument are more important than personality? Can you post the threads on which you argued so that I can get the bigger picture? Cheers

I didn't have a disagreement. I was just insulted from the very beginning of his posts on here. I can't be arsed to troll through all my posts just to find which ones. I'm a big lad and I can take it, it's no big deal to me. I just took a dislike to the guy, but that's what happens when someone posts like that.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
I'm not bitter mate, I love all of my BoxRec chums, except for the Mr Jim, who immediately went on the offensive against me within his first dozen posts, claiming to know my level of boxing knowledge inside out. Got no time for wankers like that mate.

Ok... so you say you attack his posts just because you had a disagreement early on? So you're attacking him with an ad hominem argument? Surely on a respected and mature forum like this, content and argument are more important than personality? Can you post the threads on which you argued so that I can get the bigger picture? Cheers

I didn't have a disagreement. I was just insulted from the very beginning of his posts on here. I can't be arsed to troll through all my posts just to find which ones. I'm a big lad and I can take it, it's no big deal to me. I just took a dislike to the guy, but that's what happens when someone posts like that.

And that's fine, but you must realise it doesn't look good when you attack every post just because you dislike the poster....

keithmoonhangover wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
I'm not bitter mate, I love all of my BoxRec chums, except for the Mr Jim, who immediately went on the offensive against me within his first dozen posts, claiming to know my level of boxing knowledge inside out. Got no time for wankers like that mate.

Ok... so you say you attack his posts just because you had a disagreement early on? So you're attacking him with an ad hominem argument? Surely on a respected and mature forum like this, content and argument are more important than personality? Can you post the threads on which you argued so that I can get the bigger picture? Cheers

I didn't have a disagreement. I was just insulted from the very beginning of his posts on here. I can't be arsed to troll through all my posts just to find which ones. I'm a big lad and I can take it, it's no big deal to me. I just took a dislike to the guy, but that's what happens when someone posts like that.

So you're "not bitter", but you're still dwelling on posts written in 2013. And all these years later you're launching silly ad hominem attacks against me, even though it's "no big deal" to you. . . . And i'm the "wanker," apparently.

I have no recollection of the argument that's haunting you, but more than likely I pulled you up on one of your frequent, numerous factually inaccurate statements, such as 'Riddick Bowe never signed to fight Lennox Lewis', backed it up with evidence and instead of admitting you were wrong like "a big man" you quietly retired from the the thread to seethe and concoct this never-ending campaign of petulant school boy insults.

reggaereggae wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:
Ok... so you say you attack his posts just because you had a disagreement early on? So you're attacking him with an ad hominem argument? Surely on a respected and mature forum like this, content and argument are more important than personality? Can you post the threads on which you argued so that I can get the bigger picture? Cheers

I didn't have a disagreement. I was just insulted from the very beginning of his posts on here. I can't be arsed to troll through all my posts just to find which ones. I'm a big lad and I can take it, it's no big deal to me. I just took a dislike to the guy, but that's what happens when someone posts like that.

And that's fine, but you must realise it doesn't look good when you attack every post just because you dislike the poster....

1. I don't attack every post.
2. I don't care what it looks like.

Newton said that for every action there is an equal or opposite reaction. Well, this is my reaction to the way Tuan Jim posted. Maybe you should ask him what his action was.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
I
I didn't have a disagreement. I was just insulted from the very beginning of his posts on here. I can't be arsed to troll through all my posts just to find which ones. I'm a big lad and I can take it, it's no big deal to me. I just took a dislike to the guy, but that's what happens when someone posts like that.

And that's fine, but you must realise it doesn't look good when you attack every post just because you dislike the poster....

1. I don't attack every post.
2. I don't care what it looks like.

Newton said that for every action there is an equal or opposite reaction. Well, this is my reaction to the way Tuan Jim posted. Maybe you should ask him what his action was.

I'm sorry, but the greater the protestations the more I think my fibreglass factory theory is correct. And I really don't think Newton's theory had anything to do with Internet forum postings or human discussion! let it go Keith, let it go! And enjoy the boxing and the banter and the disagreements..... Stop thinking about 3 year old posts, it makes you look extremely narcissistic with some psychopathic tendencies.....

Tuan_Jim wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:
Ok... so you say you attack his posts just because you had a disagreement early on? So you're attacking him with an ad hominem argument? Surely on a respected and mature forum like this, content and argument are more important than personality? Can you post the threads on which you argued so that I can get the bigger picture? Cheers

I didn't have a disagreement. I was just insulted from the very beginning of his posts on here. I can't be arsed to troll through all my posts just to find which ones. I'm a big lad and I can take it, it's no big deal to me. I just took a dislike to the guy, but that's what happens when someone posts like that.

So you're "not bitter", but you're still dwelling on posts written in 2013. And all these years later you're launching silly ad hominem attacks against me, even though it's "no big deal" to you. . . . And i'm the "wanker," apparently.

I have no recollection of the argument that's haunting you, but more than likely I pulled you up on one of your frequent, numerous factually inaccurate statements, such as 'Riddick Bowe never signed to fight Lennox Lewis', backed it up with evidence and instead of admitting you were wrong like "a big man" you quietly retired from the the thread to seethe and concoct this never-ending campaign of petulant school boy insults.

You have no recollection? But then recall a thread. Hmmmm.

My 'school boy' insults only cam about because of your insults. You called me out by name on one of your first posts, yet criticize my behavior. Hmmm.

reggaereggae wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:
And that's fine, but you must realise it doesn't look good when you attack every post just because you dislike the poster....

1. I don't attack every post.
2. I don't care what it looks like.

Newton said that for every action there is an equal or opposite reaction. Well, this is my reaction to the way Tuan Jim posted. Maybe you should ask him what his action was.

I'm sorry, but the greater the protestations the more I think my fibreglass factory theory is correct. And I really don't think Newton's theory had anything to do with Internet forum postings or human discussion! let it go Keith, let it go! And enjoy the boxing and the banter and the disagreements..... Stop thinking about 3 year old posts, it makes you look extremely narcissistic with some psychopathic tendencies.....

You asked me why I was posted on this thread and I told you. I'm only thinking of old posts because you asked me why. Again, I don't what what I look like.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Tuan_Jim wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
I didn't have a disagreement. I was just insulted from the very beginning of his posts on here. I can't be arsed to troll through all my posts just to find which ones. I'm a big lad and I can take it, it's no big deal to me. I just took a dislike to the guy, but that's what happens when someone posts like that.

So you're "not bitter", but you're still dwelling on posts written in 2013. And all these years later you're launching silly ad hominem attacks against me, even though it's "no big deal" to you. . . . And i'm the "wanker," apparently.

I have no recollection of the argument that's haunting you, but more than likely I pulled you up on one of your frequent, numerous factually inaccurate statements, such as 'Riddick Bowe never signed to fight Lennox Lewis', backed it up with evidence and instead of admitting you were wrong like "a big man" you quietly retired from the the thread to seethe and concoct this never-ending campaign of petulant school boy insults.

You have no recollection? But then recall a thread. Hmmmm.

My 'school boy' insults only cam about because of your insults. You called me out by name on one of your first posts, yet criticize my behavior. Hmmm.

Keith, I like your posts and enjoy a lot of what you write.... But in this case you are embarassing yourself and degrading your reputation. You are acting like a bitter child who has thrown all his toys out of his pram, and just because someone criticised you.... Come on... I'm sure you're better than that, just leave it.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
1. I don't attack every post.
2. I don't care what it looks like.

Newton said that for every action there is an equal or opposite reaction. Well, this is my reaction to the way Tuan Jim posted. Maybe you should ask him what his action was.

I'm sorry, but the greater the protestations the more I think my fibreglass factory theory is correct. And I really don't think Newton's theory had anything to do with Internet forum postings or human discussion! let it go Keith, let it go! And enjoy the boxing and the banter and the disagreements..... Stop thinking about 3 year old posts, it makes you look extremely narcissistic with some psychopathic tendencies.....

You asked me why I was posted on this thread and I told you. I'm only thinking of old posts because you asked me why. Again, I don't what what I look like.

I have no idea what point you're trying to make. Stop drinking or sniffing glue before you post again. I'm worried about you!

I'm sorry but there's a night of live boxing on that's far more interesting than listening to you publicly wrestle with your psychosis.

If you need to use a Conor Benn thread to make a fool of yourself (again) it's all yours. I'll be enjoying the fights.

reggaereggae wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:
I'm sorry, but the greater the protestations the more I think my fibreglass factory theory is correct. And I really don't think Newton's theory had anything to do with Internet forum postings or human discussion! let it go Keith, let it go! And enjoy the boxing and the banter and the disagreements..... Stop thinking about 3 year old posts, it makes you look extremely narcissistic with some psychopathic tendencies.....

You asked me why I was posted on this thread and I told you. I'm only thinking of old posts because you asked me why. Again, I don't what what I look like.

I have no idea what point you're trying to make. Stop drinking or sniffing glue before you post again. I'm worried about you!

I'm not trying to make any point. You're making more of this than there is. I'm chilled. Just watching the boxing/golf and recovering from a very hard couple of weeks at the fibreglass factory.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
You asked me why I was posted on this thread and I told you. I'm only thinking of old posts because you asked me why. Again, I don't what what I look like.

I have no idea what point you're trying to make. Stop drinking or sniffing glue before you post again. I'm worried about you!

I'm not trying to make any point. You're making more of this than there is. I'm chilled. Just watching the boxing/golf and recovering from a very hard couple of weeks at the fibreglass factory.

I have to commend you here on your sense of humour! Congrats

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Tuan_Jim wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
The exclamation mark after the word single makes me think that my lady doth protest to much.

Your playground level attacks confirm my impressions of your intelligence, Keithy old boy. Worry not, the future Mrs tuan_jim shall be joining me later on tonight in my lovely North London abode. Her plan is to miss the boxing entirely. No one's perfect.

You must be a millionaire or have a massive schlong, because your patter stinks.

You can be/have both.

Or so my bank manager and wife tell me.

Loynesy wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Tuan_Jim wrote:
Your playground level attacks confirm my impressions of your intelligence, Keithy old boy. Worry not, the future Mrs tuan_jim shall be joining me later on tonight in my lovely North London abode. Her plan is to miss the boxing entirely. No one's perfect.

You must be a millionaire or have a massive schlong, because your patter stinks.

You can be/have both.

Or so my bank manager and wife tell me.

That's not what she told me.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Loynesy wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:
You must be a millionaire or have a massive schlong, because your patter stinks.

You can be/have both.

Or so my bank manager and wife tell me.

That's not what she told me.

She told me she wanted a poor man with a small dick for once....

Loynesy wrote:She told me she wanted a poor man with a small dick for once....

Mate, I'm 6' 5" and everything's in proportion.

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Loynesy wrote:She told me she wanted a poor man with a small dick for once....

Mate, I'm 6' 5" and everything's in proportion.

Come on all of you! This is the best boxing forum on the web, with decent posters and threads.... This kind of nonsense is demeaning....

reggaereggae wrote:This kind of nonsense is demeaning....

I blame George Groves.

So...Conor Benn...

keithmoonhangover wrote:

reggaereggae wrote:This kind of nonsense is demeaning....

I blame George Groves.

Of course. This man's satanic influence has poisoned boxing.,,,,

fornicate me, am I reading comments on youtube?

Just watched the fight this morning, i know its only his debut but he has his hands low. stalks like his dad. Not alot to say apart from that really. good luck to him though.

He stalks just like his dad but brings none of the booming power. Can't work him out at this point. He doesn't seem deadly serious like Eubank II. He just seems like a kid having a laugh. No idea how he'll fare in a real fight.