Re: Next For Charles Martin?
Posted: 12 Apr 2016, 07:14
Probably been bounced round Europe a few times.....He can make some money with the former heavyweight champion logo stuck to his name.....
He can do what Trevor Berbick used to; he used to wear a robe with 'WBC HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION' long after Mike Tyson had bounced him around the ring like a netball & ripped the title from him.Switch hitter wrote:Probably been bounced round Europe a few times.....He can make some money with the former heavyweight champion logo stuck to his name.....
True.Ricky_ wrote:Find another profession should be an option. You don't see any swimmers afraid of water do you?
Me either. The clips I saw of his winning fights, he looked a clubfighter. Zero defence, big looping shots, head held up high, poor footwork.caldo2025 wrote:$8 million? Who counted that money? Martin? We now know the guy doesn't know how to count to 10. What a tool bag this guy is.
Charles Martin must be the worst heavyweight champion in boxing history. I can't think of anyone worse.
My money would be on the bin by split decision!DSW wrote:The bin would be his best bet
I got taken in by the kid having the balls to cross the pond and take on that beast in his first defense. I thought that he either must be THAT good that he's taking on a challenge like this OR this guys is so bad that he could lose against a soft boxer if carefully matched up so might as well cash in when they could. It was definitely the latter.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Me either. The clips I saw of his winning fights, he looked a clubfighter. Zero defence, big looping shots, head held up high, poor footwork.caldo2025 wrote:$8 million? Who counted that money? Martin? We now know the guy doesn't know how to count to 10. What a tool bag this guy is.
Charles Martin must be the worst heavyweight champion in boxing history. I can't think of anyone worse.
I'd also contend that they weren't even delivered with full power. They were hard shots, no doubt, but I think Martin was more than happy to be bowled over ASAP.caldo2025 wrote:I got taken in by the kid having the balls to cross the pond and take on that beast in his first defense. I thought that he either must be THAT good that he's taking on a challenge like this OR this guys is so bad that he could lose against a soft boxer if carefully matched up so might as well cash in when they could. It was definitely the latter.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Me either. The clips I saw of his winning fights, he looked a clubfighter. Zero defence, big looping shots, head held up high, poor footwork.caldo2025 wrote:$8 million? Who counted that money? Martin? We now know the guy doesn't know how to count to 10. What a tool bag this guy is.
Charles Martin must be the worst heavyweight champion in boxing history. I can't think of anyone worse.
Those two right hands were right down Broad Street, no faint or anything. No defense at all. How this guy got a title shot is crazy.
We are definitely seeing people not gauging the 10 count correctly lately and then trying to blame the referee for being incorrect when it's obvious that they just wanted a way out. There's a fine line between being a veteran boxer utilizing his full window of time during a knockdown and a guy that just didn't want to get up in time to continue fighting. They really give the ref no other alternative but to count them out. No one hears that count better than the guy on the ground 12 "'s away from fingers showing him what number the count is up to but still boxers complain to the ref. Get up at 8 and problem is solved.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I'd also contend that they weren't even delivered with full power. They were hard shots, no doubt, but I think Martin was more than happy to be bowled over ASAP.caldo2025 wrote:I got taken in by the kid having the balls to cross the pond and take on that beast in his first defense. I thought that he either must be THAT good that he's taking on a challenge like this OR this guys is so bad that he could lose against a soft boxer if carefully matched up so might as well cash in when they could. It was definitely the latter.jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Me either. The clips I saw of his winning fights, he looked a clubfighter. Zero defence, big looping shots, head held up high, poor footwork.
Those two right hands were right down Broad Street, no faint or anything. No defense at all. How this guy got a title shot is crazy.