BoxRec

ikorolev wrote:I wouldn't hurry to call Ward, Brook and Thurman pu$$ies.

Wilder should be on top of the list. Also, Quillin, Jacobs, Braehmer, Andrade deserve the "honor". Walters is actively knocking on the door. If Canelo and Saunders keep ducking GGG, they should be included.

gilgamesh wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:1. Adonis Stevenson

2. Andre Ward

3. Wladimir Klitschko

4. Carl Frampton

5. Canelo Alvarez

Carl Frampton the #1 ranked Jr. Featherweight, just took on the #2 ranked Scott Quigg in his last fight, and is set to fight Leo Santa Cruz in August. Certainly not a soft schedule of back to back fights. You got no leg to stand on with him.

Ward is going to fight Kovalev by years end. Kovalev is about as tough a challenge as you're gonna get.

Stevenson I agree with you on.

Wlad fought like a pussy against Fury, but I respect him.

Canelo just needs to man up and fight GGG already, and I'd have no reason to criticize him at all. I even gave him the benefit of the doubt when he said he'd fight Khan because I assumed Golovkin was next, but now...I don't know.

Chepppaaa wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:1. Adonis Stevenson

2. Andre Ward

3. Wladimir Klitschko

4. Carl Frampton

5. Canelo Alvarez

Carl Frampton the #1 ranked Jr. Featherweight, just took on the #2 ranked Scott Quigg in his last fight, and is set to fight Leo Santa Cruz in August. Certainly not a soft schedule of back to back fights. You got no leg to stand on with him.

Ward is going to fight Kovalev by years end. Kovalev is about as tough a challenge as you're gonna get.

Stevenson I agree with you on.

Wlad fought like a pussy against Fury, but I respect him.

Canelo just needs to man up and fight GGG already, and I'd have no reason to criticize him at all. I even gave him the benefit of the doubt when he said he'd fight Khan because I assumed Golovkin was next, but now...I don't know.

frampton is running as fast as he can from rigo....fu&(/$§k quigg

wlad fought like a clinching pussy for 15 years !!!!!

ward will never fight kovalev.

Chepppaaa wrote:

ikorolev wrote:I wouldn't hurry to call Ward, Brook and Thurman pu$$ies.

Wilder should be on top of the list. Also, Quillin, Jacobs, Braehmer, Andrade deserve the "honor". Walters is actively knocking on the door. If Canelo and Saunders keep ducking GGG, they should be included.

you are so stupid iko....

wilder fights a champion in stiverne and now goes over to povetkins backyard russia to fight povetkin, that balls move.

gilgamesh wrote: ... because Canelo has recently stated that after fighting Khan he intends to fight Lemieux so he has no intention of fighting Golovkin clearly in spite of what BS he might say when asked directly about it.

ikorolev wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:

ikorolev wrote:I wouldn't hurry to call Ward, Brook and Thurman pu$$ies.

Wilder should be on top of the list. Also, Quillin, Jacobs, Braehmer, Andrade deserve the "honor". Walters is actively knocking on the door. If Canelo and Saunders keep ducking GGG, they should be included.

you are so stupid iko....

wilder fights a champion in stiverne and now goes over to povetkins backyard russia to fight povetkin, that balls move.

Of course he had to fight a champion to get a belt and he has to finally fight his mandatory. It happens in Russia, because they lost the purse bid. The question is who he fights when he has a choice. Anybody worth mentioning in 36 fights beside Stiverne and Povetkin ?

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Lemieux couldn't make 155 with a kilo of crack.

Chepppaaa wrote:

ikorolev wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:

you are so stupid iko....

wilder fights a champion in stiverne and now goes over to povetkins backyard russia to fight povetkin, that balls move.

Of course he had to fight a champion to get a belt and he has to finally fight his mandatory. It happens in Russia, because they lost the purse bid. The question is who he fights when he has a choice. Anybody worth mentioning in 36 fights beside Stiverne and Povetkin ?

povetkin ranked 3 boxrec
scott ranked 9 boxrec
molina ranked 17 boxrec
stiverne ranked 18 boxrec
duhaupas ranked 19 boxrec

Chepppaaa wrote:so many times ive heard on this board "he is the #1 in his division, because he is the official champion", "i favour him because he is the champion"

Chepppaaa wrote:at the end, what it comes down to is quality and quality of a boxer means more than title and who has the best quality is the real champion. all this ibf, wbc, wba dont mean nothing.

punchoutsb wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:

ikorolev wrote:
Of course he had to fight a champion to get a belt and he has to finally fight his mandatory. It happens in Russia, because they lost the purse bid. The question is who he fights when he has a choice. Anybody worth mentioning in 36 fights beside Stiverne and Povetkin ?

povetkin ranked 3 boxrec
scott ranked 9 boxrec
molina ranked 17 boxrec
stiverne ranked 18 boxrec
duhaupas ranked 19 boxrec

Chepppaaa wrote:so many times ive heard on this board "he is the #1 in his division, because he is the official champion", "i favour him because he is the champion"

Chepppaaa wrote:at the end, what it comes down to is quality and quality of a boxer means more than title and who has the best quality is the real champion. all this ibf, wbc, wba dont mean nothing.

Why do care about rankings now when you just started a thread about how rankings are worthless?

Chepppaaa wrote: you are twisting 2 things.

one is the title champion

the other

rankings

i have nothing against rankings, but something against boxers being ranked better as others just because they got a title.

punchoutsb wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote: you are twisting 2 things.

one is the title champion

the other

rankings

i have nothing against rankings, but something against boxers being ranked better as others just because they got a title.

You're a boksing expurt, do you really believe Molina is the 17th best Heavy in the world? Scott #9?

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Uh oh, Cheppa got his foot stuck in his pussy.

Chepppaaa wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Uh oh, Cheppa got his foot stuck in his pussy.

you are a not that bright schnook who posts everytime he is wrong and has nothing more to say. thats why most of your posts are smileys

BitPlayer wrote:

IRLangmaid25 wrote:

BitPlayer wrote: I also think at least one of his total mismatches was mandatory.

Both Jo Jo Dan and Kevin Bizier, have been mandatory defences forced upon Brook by the IBF which Brook has had to get through to achieve his ambitions.

What's wrong with the IBF?

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Uh oh, Cheppa got his foot stuck in his pussy.

you are a not that bright schnook who posts everytime he is wrong and has nothing more to say. thats why most of your posts are smileys

Nah, I just laugh at idiots like yourself who couldn't understand sense if it licked their bitchy pussy. What response did you want when you called me an idiot for telling you Marquez/Morales never fought and you responded with Whitaker's weight compared to Erik's? Exactly

Sure, I could verbally disgrace you. Nobody wants to read that. works best for you.

Chepppaaa wrote:

punchoutsb wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote: you are twisting 2 things.

one is the title champion

the other

rankings

i have nothing against rankings, but something against boxers being ranked better as others just because they got a title.

You're a boksing expurt, do you really believe Molina is the 17th best Heavy in the world? Scott #9?

ika asked me a question, i answered

punchoutsb wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:

punchoutsb wrote:
You're a boksing expurt, do you really believe Molina is the 17th best Heavy in the world? Scott #9?

ika asked me a question, i answered

Yep, and you used the rankings of Wilder's opponents as proof he's not a "pu$$y".

So what rankings have the opponents of Ward, Klitschko, Frampton, and Alvarez had?

Chepppaaa wrote:

punchoutsb wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:

ika asked me a question, i answered

Yep, and you used the rankings of Wilder's opponents as proof he's not a "pu$$y".

So what rankings have the opponents of Ward, Klitschko, Frampton, and Alvarez had?

you are even more stupid than saad.

you take 1 thing out of a whole discussion and act like that 1 thing would cover everything

punchoutsb wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:

punchoutsb wrote:
Yep, and you used the rankings of Wilder's opponents as proof he's not a "pu$$y".

So what rankings have the opponents of Ward, Klitschko, Frampton, and Alvarez had?

you are even more stupid than saad.

you take 1 thing out of a whole discussion and act like that 1 thing would cover everything

But it's the one thing that you yourself used. I'm just curious what a real boksing expurt has to say about this hypocrisy.

Chepppaaa wrote:

punchoutsb wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:
you are even more stupid than saad.

you take 1 thing out of a whole discussion and act like that 1 thing would cover everything

But it's the one thing that you yourself used. I'm just curious what a real boksing expurt has to say about this hypocrisy.

u dont get it.

punchoutsb wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:

punchoutsb wrote:
But it's the one thing that you yourself used. I'm just curious what a real boksing expurt has to say about this hypocrisy.

u dont get it.

It was all your words.

Chepppaaa wrote:i never used wilders record as an answer why he is no pussy. i just answered a question of ikorev, who asked me, who wilder faced!

the reason why wilder is no pussy is because he willing to go to russia and fight a top 5 heavyweight.

the reason why ward is a pussy cause he fought nobody in so many years and wants another b level opponent before kovalev.

the reason why wlad is a pussy, cause he is a pussy ass clincher.

the reason why rampton, cause he is running from rigo

Chepppaaa wrote:

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:

Chepppaaa wrote:

you are a not that bright schnook who posts everytime he is wrong and has nothing more to say. thats why most of your posts are smileys

Nah, I just laugh at idiots like yourself who couldn't understand sense if it licked their bitchy pussy. What response did you want when you called me an idiot for telling you Marquez/Morales never fought and you responded with Whitaker's weight compared to Erik's? Exactly

Sure, I could verbally disgrace you. Nobody wants to read that. works best for you.

you can do nothing because you are stupid.

you were suggesting why whitacker and morales never fought and i told you they boxed in different weights at different times. and yeah morales and marquez never fought each other. they ducked each other, like floyd the god of ducks.