BoxRec

digzee wrote:
Haha, yeh i'm glad someone else noticed.

His name is $money$...



Don't think he'd ever win the 'Hide & Seek' championships.




Sad sack.

Ricky_ wrote:

digzee wrote:
Haha, yeh i'm glad someone else noticed.

His name is $money$...



Don't think he'd ever win the 'Hide & Seek' championships.




Sad sack.

I bet that kid is older and more intelligent then brut, he will never learn I don't know why he doesn't just use another forum.

Moderators, Brut is back ...

How can you call Canelo a coward. I think everyone on this forum as enough boxing knowledge to understand how the business of boxing work. Let me get that straight, i am not the biggest Canelo fan but i am pretty sure he would take anyone his Promoter put ahead of him. Golden boy sacrifice Lemieux to GGG and he probably don't see his guy winning after that fight, so what is he going to do. Ruin his only cash cow. Forget it. They going to build this so a lost would not ruin him

kidbazooka1 wrote:

ikorolev wrote:Any chance we could have kidschizooka banned too ?

Oh so when someone doesn't agree with you just kick them out.

Wow real mature stuff pal.

This forum would be a lot better off without childish posters like you.

Ive been on this board a lot longer than you and it was a great board, still pretty much is except for posters like you.

From what I gathered reading this forum it appears that way to me, are the Mods friends of these guys like this?

And who is this guy (Ricky)? He keeps calling me some Brut name or something; what's that about? I've already told him but he seems to have some personal issues with that guy and is taking it out on me.

kidbazooka1 wrote:

ikorolev wrote:Any chance we could have kidschizooka banned too ?

Oh so when someone doesn't agree with you just kick them out.

Wow real mature stuff pal.

This forum would be a lot better off without childish posters like you.

Ive been on this board a lot longer than you and it was a great board, still pretty much is except for posters like you.

It is not about somebody disagreeing with me, but about somebody being unprovoked hater of certain boxers.

$$Money$$ wrote: From what I gathered reading this forum it appears that way to me, are the Mods friends of these guys like this?

And who is this guy (Ricky)? He keeps calling me some Brut name or something; what's that about? I've already told him but he seems to have some personal issues with that guy and is taking it out on me.

Poor naive Money/Undefeated/Brut who "just joined" and doesn't know who Ricky or Brut are

ikorolev wrote:

kidbazooka1 wrote:

ikorolev wrote:Any chance we could have kidschizooka banned too ?

Oh so when someone doesn't agree with you just kick them out.

Wow real mature stuff pal.

This forum would be a lot better off without childish posters like you.

Ive been on this board a lot longer than you and it was a great board, still pretty much is except for posters like you.

It is not about somebody disagreeing with me, but about somebody being unprovoked hater of certain boxers.

Can you say hypocrite?

kidbazooka1 wrote:

ikorolev wrote:

kidbazooka1 wrote:
Oh so when someone doesn't agree with you just kick them out.

Wow real mature stuff pal.

This forum would be a lot better off without childish posters like you.

Ive been on this board a lot longer than you and it was a great board, still pretty much is except for posters like you.

It is not about somebody disagreeing with me, but about somebody being unprovoked hater of certain boxers.

Can you say hypocrite?

OK, it is about a hypocrite (kidbazooka1)

Koolkc is oddly obsessed with GGG....I think he posts more about him than anyone else here does.

I'm glad to see he's been banned, at least for now. It's fine to disagree with people but he brought down pretty much every thread he was involved in and I learned to still clear of those.

crusader wrote:Koolkc is oddly obsessed with GGG....I think he posts more about him than anyone else here does.

I'm glad to see he's been banned, at least for now. It's fine to disagree with people but he brought down pretty much every thread he was involved in and I learned to still clear of those.

I decided to try and find out what is this history between you guys, apparently there is some bad blood here with a couple of you and the guy (koolc), from what I read in another thread on this it appeared he was debating rather civil with you guys and a couple of people started attacking him on a personal level, but somehow he ended up getting banned.

What am I missing here??

From reading what this guy (kidbazooka, or something like that) wrote it appears that the Mods have some sort of agreement going with you guys to ban whoever doesn't like GGG or says something that a couple of you do not like that he gets reported to the Moderator for trolling.

I'm just being neutral here, of course that isn't good in this world of today but I didn't see any name calling or disrespect against the forum's rules (i read them) that warranted to him (koolc) being booted/banned from this forum.

@ Brut!!!!

Comon man...

$$Money$$ wrote:
I'm just being neutral here, of course that isn't good in this world of today but I didn't see any name calling or disrespect against the forum's rules (i read them) that warranted to him (koolc) being booted/banned from this forum.

...no offence meant, but so was Brut!

greg wrote:

$$Money$$ wrote:
I'm just being neutral here, of course that isn't good in this world of today but I didn't see any name calling or disrespect against the forum's rules (i read them) that warranted to him (koolc) being booted/banned from this forum.

...no offence meant, but so was Brut!

Ok, so what does that mean?? Does it mean that the Moderators are neutral here or have biases?? Does it mean that they are taking sides of all these guys here who have complained of banning this person and that person that they listen to them and ban them simply because the guy (koolc) was cutting down their man with appeared to me as fact based evidence??

From what I can see there are a group of individuals who are a clique/click working together to conspire to get koolc banned because they are upset that his logic was fact based and they could not come up with an intellectual enough debate to those facts and started saying he was trolling.

When I read the posts he wrote he was quoting using links to facts, nothing wrong with that in my book but then a few people here started to call him names but never really offered any real proof to dispute what he stated.

I guess that's considered "Trolling" here to post facts and it is considered fair game by the Moderators to listen to a group of people calling for a ban on someone simply because they don't like what he said or either the Moderators aren't totally neutral???

I don't know, just going by what I've read and am reading now.

Damn bro, he's such a victim isn't he.

Maybe if there's so much injustice here it's better to post elsewhere.

crusader wrote:Damn bro, he's such a victim isn't he.

Maybe if there's so much injustice here it's better to post elsewhere.

Apparently so when a few people can just ask the Moderator to ban someone and they do it but then claim the man was "trolling" even though nothing in his post indicate that.

I consider a Troll one who is making up BS without any facts or someone who starts a topic that has nothing to do with the subject of the forum just to start a name calling war.

From what I read those who came against koolc should be the ones who were banned because they were calling him names and he never insulted them.

When and why did kool get banned?

I missed it.

The deevolution of Brut...

KBB... BRUT... Undefeated 49-0... $$Money$$

Impractical Poster wrote:When and why did kool get banned?

I missed it.

Check the first page of this thread.

Can you say hypocrite?[/quote]

OK, it is about a hypocrite (kidbazooka1) [/quote]

That hit home for you huh big guy.

Impractical Poster wrote:When and why did kool get banned?

I missed it.

The Mod claimed it was for Trolling but when I read the posts he made none of it seemed like trolling to me. There were a few guys here calling for certain people to be banned and it appeared the Mod complied.

It appears that the Mods are not fair and are either taking orders from a group of people who were upset with koolc for posting the facts or they (the Mods) are biased towards certain fighters and cannot separate their personal feelings from their supposed professional ones here on this forum.

$$Money$$ wrote:

Impractical Poster wrote:When and why did kool get banned?

I missed it.

The Mod claimed it was for Trolling but when I read the posts he made none of it seemed like trolling to me. There were a few guys here calling for certain people to be banned and it appeared the Mod complied.

It appears that the Mods are not fair and are either taking orders from a group of people who were upset with koolc for posting the facts or they (the Mods) are biased towards certain fighters and cannot separate their personal feelings from their supposed professional ones here on this forum.

Like it matters man... He can just start another account under a different username just like you do. He'll be back and you guys can continue to pal around..... then again, you may be the same person.

Sadly Sulaiman does not at all sound like he's going to force Canelo to face GGG - but let's face it we all know Canelo and Oscar don't want the fight with GGG as it will destroy Canelo as a long term cash cow - GGG would KO canelo now and that would be the end of Canelo and it would seriously jeapordize Golden Boy's future - the WBC wants their bite of the future Canelo jackpots and the WBC knows GGG is 34 and his prime is near the end - the WBC just needs to keep stalling for Canelo and hope GGG suddenly ages or loses then Canelo will become the biggest $ maker in the sport and Oscar and the WBC and HBO will be in the driver's seat of the sport - GGG is just a comet that will soon fizzle out and be downplayed as a one dimensional overrated bum beater - but the truth is GGG is one of the most amazing fighters in history - But the US media does not like white fighters they prefer latinos or blacks - Canelo will continue his series of beating up on set ups like Khan and old veterans cashing out like Cotto etc - Cotto is just there for the last paydays and easy set ups if he can still get them -

Omg why are people so stupid.

There will be an agreement period. If the two promoters don't come to a deal about the fight then there is a purse bid.

WHEN THERE IS A PURSE BID NOBODY CAN REQUEST A CATCH-WEIGHT IN THE CONTRACT.

So if Canelo wants to fight at 155 the only thing he can do is persuade GGG to fighting at a catchweight. If GGG refuses under any circumstances, then this fight will be fought at the MIddleweight limit of 160 pounds or Canelo will refuse to fight GGG and drop the belt/or will be stripped.

PERIOD

$$Money$$ wrote:

kidbazooka1 wrote:

ikorolev wrote:Any chance we could have kidschizooka banned too ?

Oh so when someone doesn't agree with you just kick them out.

Wow real mature stuff pal.

This forum would be a lot better off without childish posters like you.

Ive been on this board a lot longer than you and it was a great board, still pretty much is except for posters like you.

From what I gathered reading this forum it appears that way to me, are the Mods friends of these guys like this?

And who is this guy (Ricky)? He keeps calling me some Brut name or something; what's that about? I've already told him but he seems to have some personal issues with that guy and is taking it out on me.

Goodbye $$Money$$. It's weird that you claim that you don't know Brut but you post from the same ip address as him (also same ip as his KBB and Undefeated49-0 aliases)