BoxRec

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Coco wrote:I'm reading Molina then a Whyte rematch.
The Hearns are sticking to the formula they which they used on Chris Eubank.

It served them well then. I hope they keep AJ busy.

I think they are doing the right thing, keeping him busy, he's still really a prospect, the title belt he has means zilch, except of course it adds to their ability to sell his fights.

If we get Joshua v Fury next year, it could be as big as Eubank v Benn, and would be the first time two UK belt holders met for a heavyweight show down. Would be a humungous fight, maybe the biggest in the UK ever.

jamesmcdonnell wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

Coco wrote:I'm reading Molina then a Whyte rematch.
The Hearns are sticking to the formula they which they used on Chris Eubank.

It served them well then. I hope they keep AJ busy.

I think they are doing the right thing, keeping him busy, he's still really a prospect, the title belt he has means zilch, except of course it adds to their ability to sell his fights.

If we get Joshua v Fury next year, it could be as big as Eubank v Benn, and would be the first time two UK belt holders met for a heavyweight show down. Would be a humungous fight, maybe the biggest in the UK ever.

It would be a HUGE fight. If Fury loses the rematch, then it won't be anywhere near as big - still a big 'un though.