THOUGHTS OVERALL ON NASEEM HAMED CAREER

Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: THOUGHTS OVERALL ON NASEEM HAMED CAREER

Post by Best Coast »

Taansend wrote:Tyson was Spinks & Naz was Robinson. After each one they just went more for power than skill. Each still had odd glimpses of greatness but both generally underperformed after that.
I hope you're not talking about RAY Robinson, widely regarded as the #1 P4P boxer of ALL-TIME. That would be a horrendous insult to even mention Hamed in the same breath as Sugar Ray Robinson.

I think a comparison of Naz to Tyson would be far more sensible. Tyson was exposed by Douglas, Holyfield and others but stuck around in the fight game another 8 years because it was his life. Hamed was exposed by Marco Antonio Barrera the same way but rode off into the sunset to avoid a multiple-loss career like Tyson had.

Hamed's pre-Barrera list of victims was less impressive than Tyson's pre-Holyfield resume': Kelley, Bungu, Soto, Vazquez, Johnson & Medina.

That's slightly less impressive than Tyson's resume of unbeaten Michael Spinks, Holmes, Tucker, Ruddock twice, & Bruno twice.
Best Coast
Welterweight
Posts: 3133
Joined: 07 Mar 2016, 22:53

Re: THOUGHTS OVERALL ON NASEEM HAMED CAREER

Post by Best Coast »

thomasjkelley wrote:I think he was an over-hyped promotion pimped by HBO. All show no substance.
Is it coincidence or was this topic inspired by the recent death of Hamed's "transgender" namesake PRINCE?
Luckybattles
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 283
Joined: 24 Aug 2008, 17:42

Re: THOUGHTS OVERALL ON NASEEM HAMED CAREER

Post by Luckybattles »

So far his career was identical to that of Connor mcgregor. Talked an enormous amount of sh... with great talent but crawled into a hole after getting his first beat down. Very entertaining and reflection of a great boxing era shortly before the sport went downhill
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11881
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: THOUGHTS OVERALL ON NASEEM HAMED CAREER

Post by Taansend »

Best Coast wrote:
Taansend wrote:Tyson was Spinks & Naz was Robinson. After each one they just went more for power than skill. Each still had odd glimpses of greatness but both generally underperformed after that.
I hope you're not talking about RAY Robinson, widely regarded as the #1 P4P boxer of ALL-TIME. That would be a horrendous insult to even mention Hamed in the same breath as Sugar Ray Robinson.
You funny funny man :lol:

I said that both Tyson & Naz went downhill after a certain performance - because they boxed less & banged more.

Tyson peaked with Michael Spinks & Naz peaked with STEVE Robinson. Not sure where you conjured up Ray from but it was comedy genius.

Thank you for providing me with my morning laugh :TU:
thomasjkelley
Cruiserweight
Posts: 391
Joined: 12 Mar 2011, 03:58

Re: THOUGHTS OVERALL ON NASEEM HAMED CAREER

Post by thomasjkelley »

Best Coast wrote:
thomasjkelley wrote:I think he was an over-hyped promotion pimped by HBO. All show no substance.
Is it coincidence or was this topic inspired by the recent death of Hamed's "transgender" namesake PRINCE?
Touché Best!
Post Reply