I hope you're not talking about RAY Robinson, widely regarded as the #1 P4P boxer of ALL-TIME. That would be a horrendous insult to even mention Hamed in the same breath as Sugar Ray Robinson.Taansend wrote:Tyson was Spinks & Naz was Robinson. After each one they just went more for power than skill. Each still had odd glimpses of greatness but both generally underperformed after that.
I think a comparison of Naz to Tyson would be far more sensible. Tyson was exposed by Douglas, Holyfield and others but stuck around in the fight game another 8 years because it was his life. Hamed was exposed by Marco Antonio Barrera the same way but rode off into the sunset to avoid a multiple-loss career like Tyson had.
Hamed's pre-Barrera list of victims was less impressive than Tyson's pre-Holyfield resume': Kelley, Bungu, Soto, Vazquez, Johnson & Medina.
That's slightly less impressive than Tyson's resume of unbeaten Michael Spinks, Holmes, Tucker, Ruddock twice, & Bruno twice.