BoxRec

asdfjkl wrote:

foxdog1923 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: Oke, so first you say that I don't seem to understand what bookies do and now you agree Takam is a big risk?

You have poor English comprehension. I said that the bookies are favoring Parker to win and that's why they are offering to pay punters 4 times their money back IF Takam wins. I never said my personal opinion about Takam until now.

I even said in my earlier posts that I think the bookies are unfair to Takam and that it should be 50/50 or 60/40 to Parker. The odds shouldnt heavily favour Parker. Go read my earlier post.

When you read my posts you think that it's always favoring Parker. I'm a big fan of Parker but I don't get carried away. You got to stop reading my posts like I only like Parker.

Then why do you quote me, explaining something everybody already understand while even agreeing with me yourself??

Your quote makes no sense in that case lol.

foxdog1923 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote:

foxdog1923 wrote: You have poor English comprehension. I said that the bookies are favoring Parker to win and that's why they are offering to pay punters 4 times their money back IF Takam wins. I never said my personal opinion about Takam until now.

I even said in my earlier posts that I think the bookies are unfair to Takam and that it should be 50/50 or 60/40 to Parker. The odds shouldnt heavily favour Parker. Go read my earlier post.

When you read my posts you think that it's always favoring Parker. I'm a big fan of Parker but I don't get carried away. You got to stop reading my posts like I only like Parker.

Then why do you quote me, explaining something everybody already understand while even agreeing with me yourself??

Your quote makes no sense in that case lol.

Nobody agrees with you dummy.

I'm telling you why the bookies made their odds. Never did I say I agree with their odds as it favors Parker heavily. THAT'S WHAT THE BOOKIES ARE DOING OK?

THAT'S NOT WHAT I BELIEVE OK?

You need English comprehension skills. I keep repeating it's easy to understand but you can't figure it out as you have shown on your posts. YOUR posts is my PROOF that you lack English comprehension.

asdfjkl wrote:

foxdog1923 wrote:

asdfjkl wrote: Then why do you quote me, explaining something everybody already understand while even agreeing with me yourself??

Your quote makes no sense in that case lol.

Nobody agrees with you dummy.

I'm telling you why the bookies made their odds. Never did I say I agree with their odds as it favors Parker heavily. THAT'S WHAT THE BOOKIES ARE DOING OK?

THAT'S NOT WHAT I BELIEVE OK?

You need English comprehension skills. I keep repeating it's easy to understand but you can't figure it out as you have shown on your posts. YOUR posts is my PROOF that you lack English comprehension.

Nobody agrees with me? Then what's the first thing said by the first person quoting you?
"asdfjkl is right" perhaps? You know what? Have fun mate, you're completely right, even when you contradict yourself, nobody is as perfect as you are.