Re: Canelo-Khan RBR
Posted: 07 May 2016, 22:41
They gotta stop putting Tapia in with bangers. Kirkland and Lemiuex. Jesus. Give the guy some non punchers before you kill him.
Again with your bullsh!t? I scored every round for Lemieux, Einstone.Lancenix wrote:This fight is way more one sided than being described by Tanzio. DL is just landing so many huge shots!!
I've watched 3 former GGG opponents tonight that I believe would make a better fight than Khan. For all the stick GGG's resume gets, he's about the same size as Canelo but has fought much bigger fighters.diddy wrote:Lemieux Canelo is a GREAT fight. Not this crap they're feeding us tonight. Then again I'm not paying to watch so what do I care.
Very similar to Broner.crusader wrote:Ya the talent is there for Gomez.....the dedication not so much.
Round 3 was relatively close. Lemieux still won it but it was Tapia's best round.Lancenix wrote:It was not a close round. This was very one sided. I am glad the corner stopped the fight.Tanzio wrote:Round 3 = Lemieux comes out bombing. Tapia absorbing serious punishment but still standing. Good right. Another by tapia. Nice combo. Lemieux comes on. Tapia lands a great body combo at the end.
Close round.
30-27 Lemieux but Tapia still there.
I saw Lemieux and Curtis Stevens, who is the 3rd?Deadendgeneration wrote:I've watched 3 former GGG opponents tonight that I believe would make a better fight than Khan. For all the stick GGG's resume gets, he's about the same size as Canelo but has fought much bigger fighters.diddy wrote:Lemieux Canelo is a GREAT fight. Not this crap they're feeding us tonight. Then again I'm not paying to watch so what do I care.
Martin Murray, albeit he fought at 168 in a fight I wish I hadn't watched.hulkmaniac wrote:I saw Lemieux and Curtis Stevens, who is the 3rd?Deadendgeneration wrote:I've watched 3 former GGG opponents tonight that I believe would make a better fight than Khan. For all the stick GGG's resume gets, he's about the same size as Canelo but has fought much bigger fighters.diddy wrote:Lemieux Canelo is a GREAT fight. Not this crap they're feeding us tonight. Then again I'm not paying to watch so what do I care.
it is funny they both done the same against triple g, had power but didnt really throw any thing lost about 7ishhulkmaniac wrote:I saw Lemieux and Curtis Stevens, who is the 3rd?Deadendgeneration wrote:I've watched 3 former GGG opponents tonight that I believe would make a better fight than Khan. For all the stick GGG's resume gets, he's about the same size as Canelo but has fought much bigger fighters.diddy wrote:Lemieux Canelo is a GREAT fight. Not this crap they're feeding us tonight. Then again I'm not paying to watch so what do I care.
dnt put that in ppls head or well never see ggg ko canelo!!brilo33 wrote:that would be a good scrap DL v saul
You were saying close rounds. NOT ME. You do not know how to score a fight.Tanzio wrote:Again with your bullsh!t? I scored every round for Lemieux, Einstone.Lancenix wrote:This fight is way more one sided than being described by Tanzio. DL is just landing so many huge shots!!
Canelo-Murray would be interesting for sure - see how Canelo deals with a guy with a good chin who's clearly bigger than him with decent skills.brilo33 wrote:it is funny they both done the same against triple g, had power but didnt really throw any thing lost about 7ishhulkmaniac wrote:I saw Lemieux and Curtis Stevens, who is the 3rd?Deadendgeneration wrote:
I've watched 3 former GGG opponents tonight that I believe would make a better fight than Khan. For all the stick GGG's resume gets, he's about the same size as Canelo but has fought much bigger fighters.
Canelo would never get in with Murray. He is a coward.jezzamundo wrote:Canelo-Murray would be interesting for sure - see how Canelo deals with a guy with a good chin who's clearly bigger than him with decent skills.brilo33 wrote:it is funny they both done the same against triple g, had power but didnt really throw any thing lost about 7ishhulkmaniac wrote:
I saw Lemieux and Curtis Stevens, who is the 3rd?
One relatively close round (3). Lemieux has been ktfo by others he was dominating.Lancenix wrote:You were saying close rounds. NOT ME. You do not know how to score a fight.Tanzio wrote:Again with your bullsh!t? I scored every round for Lemieux, Einstone.Lancenix wrote:This fight is way more one sided than being described by Tanzio. DL is just landing so many huge shots!!
Canelo would never fight DL at 160 anyway.watsupdoc87 wrote:dnt put that in ppls head or well never see ggg ko canelo!!brilo33 wrote:that would be a good scrap DL v saul
harsh that boy was fighting men as a kidLancenix wrote:Canelo would never get in with Murray. He is a coward.jezzamundo wrote:Canelo-Murray would be interesting for sure - see how Canelo deals with a guy with a good chin who's clearly bigger than him with decent skills.brilo33 wrote: it is funny they both done the same against triple g, had power but didnt really throw any thing lost about 7ish
Yep and HBO is the one behind that. PPV dollars.ikorolev wrote:It is funny how promotion clips and interviews pretend that GGG doesn't exist and Canelo is a real MW champion.
You mean Mexican taxi cab drivers? Those men?brilo33 wrote:harsh that boy was fighting men as a kidLancenix wrote:Canelo would never get in with Murray. He is a coward.jezzamundo wrote:
Canelo-Murray would be interesting for sure - see how Canelo deals with a guy with a good chin who's clearly bigger than him with decent skills.