Page 2 of 2
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 10 May 2016, 11:31
by BroughtonRulesRefuge
Tarkus wrote:
Only thing you have proven is that you have no idea what median is and therefore you don't know what you are talking about.
--- The median is that grassy strip in the middle of the highway where I always see you dragging a garbage bag while picking up the trash in your sweaty florescent jump suit, thusly and therefore I always know what I am talking about.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 10 May 2016, 11:42
by Lennox
BitPlayer wrote:Lennox wrote:Pulev at 5
Chisora out
Chisora is over 2 years since his last reasonable win against an opponent ranked 28. Since that he lost to Fury (no disgrace) and IMO totally dominated by Pulev. His style has not changed, he is not a big puncher, so there is nothing subjectively that leads to believe he can ever defeat a top 20 opponent again. Objectively that is backed up, he faced 5 non top 100 opponents prior to the Pulev fight.
Everyone on that list beats him. Stiverne would totally school him.
He already beat Malik Scott.
That was a fair time ago now (as I said in the post) I am pretty sure he has got worse since then and Malik would not lose again. If you remember the Scott-Chisora fight, Scott was winning until a bizarre ending where Scott seemed to just give up.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 10 May 2016, 11:47
by Horse
Lennox wrote:That was a fair time ago now (as I said in the post) I am pretty sure he has got worse since then and Malik would not lose again. If you remember the Scott-Chisora fight, Scott was winning until a bizarre ending where Scott seemed to just give up.
The fight was pretty even and either fighter could have been considered to be ahead on reasonable scorecards at the time of the stoppage.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 10 May 2016, 12:23
by Lennox
Horse wrote:Lennox wrote:That was a fair time ago now (as I said in the post) I am pretty sure he has got worse since then and Malik would not lose again. If you remember the Scott-Chisora fight, Scott was winning until a bizarre ending where Scott seemed to just give up.
The fight was pretty even and either fighter could have been considered to be ahead on reasonable scorecards at the time of the stoppage.
IMO Scott was well ahead.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 10 May 2016, 13:01
by asdfjkl
Lennox wrote:BitPlayer wrote:Lennox wrote:Pulev at 5
Chisora out
Chisora is over 2 years since his last reasonable win against an opponent ranked 28. Since that he lost to Fury (no disgrace) and IMO totally dominated by Pulev. His style has not changed, he is not a big puncher, so there is nothing subjectively that leads to believe he can ever defeat a top 20 opponent again. Objectively that is backed up, he faced 5 non top 100 opponents prior to the Pulev fight.
Everyone on that list beats him. Stiverne would totally school him.
He already beat Malik Scott.
That was a fair time ago now (as I said in the post) I am pretty sure he has got worse since then and Malik would not lose again. If you remember the Scott-Chisora fight, Scott was winning until a bizarre ending where Scott seemed to just give up.
Well I'm pretty sure both Scott, as well as Stiverne don't deserve to be in this list at all.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 12 May 2016, 03:32
by Belanio
My vote: Pulev remains at #5, Chisora to #13.
Re: Updating the BOXREC Forum Heavyweight Rankings
Posted: 14 May 2016, 07:08
by jezzamundo
Votes have been tallied, Pulev remains at #5, Chisora slips to #13.
Champion: Tyson Fury
1. Wladimir Klitschko
2. Alexander Povetkin
3. Deontay Wilder
4. Luis Ortiz
5. Kubrat Pulev
6. Anthony Joshua
7. Bryant Jennings
8. Carlos Takam
9. Vyacheslav Glazkov
10. Lucas Browne
11. Bermane Stiverne
12. Artur Szpilka
13. Dereck Chisora
14. Malik Scott
15. Joseph Parker